Conquer Club

Feudal Epic, L&S, Pg. 49 [D, Gp, Gr]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby wcaclimbing on Tue Sep 02, 2008 4:40 pm

Could I request a few name changes? just the locations of the numbers.
I can't count how many times I've attacked Barbarians 6 instead of Lake Minstello 6 on Feudal 1, because they have the same number (6) and are bordering the same territories, leading to lots of mistake attacks.

Its made me do quite a few attacks I didn't like and I'd like it if that problem was fixed on this map.

Just the territories that are bordering two of the same numbers. A simple switch between two numbers is all thats needed, and would help eliminate a lot of mistake attacks that are sent to the wrong territories, just because the numbers are the same.

Tri 12, neighboring two different 10 territories.
Hor 9, bordering two 7 territories.

Those are the only two that I see right now. I'd appreciate it if you would move one of the 10s and one of the 7s, so no territory borders ones that have matching numbers.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class wcaclimbing
 
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby Ethitts on Tue Sep 02, 2008 4:47 pm

I second most comments made already, so I don't have to much to say. However, there is 1 thing that I don't think anyone has pointed out yet: it says in the legend "ever two territories", should it not be "every two territories"? Map looks great though, I'm actually a fan of 1 entrance into the castles, but that's because I'm a defense player and like those kinds of things :) . It could create a lot of stalemate games though

Edit: should point out that I'm not a fan of the name at all sorry
ImageImage
User avatar
Major Ethitts
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:53 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby blakebowling on Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:03 am

omg, I must play it

:o :o :o :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D


BTW: Doesn't Fate sound better???

=D> =D> =D>
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5096
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby Try Again on Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:28 am

this is amazing for a first draft and i don't care what the name of the map is i just care that it is a good map :D
Corporal Try Again
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 12:20 pm
Location: Sitting in front of my computer.

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby yeti_c on Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:31 am

Yeah - I mentioned "Ever" to gimil the other day and he still didn't fix it...

You missed "Dynsaty" too. (Damn you gimil don't you ever listen?!?!)

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby yeti_c on Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:34 am

wcaclimbing wrote:Tri 12, neighboring two different 10 territories.
Hor 9, bordering two 7 territories.

Those are the only two that I see right now. I'd appreciate it if you would move one of the 10s and one of the 7s, so no territory borders ones that have matching numbers.


Yeah I pointed these out to gimil too - he's gonna change these - you'll notice that he did try to ensure this didn't happen on this map this time - but missed those 2.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby gdeangel on Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:34 am

t-o-m wrote::D

One thing that ive already told you, i dont like the way that there's only one entrance to each castle :(


I agree with Tom. This is going to have one very clear set of strategies with only one entrance. If you move the castles up near the wall, you can then make a 1-way passage through the wall out of the kingdom into the adjacent plains. That would create a more "attack" friendly environment, and also eliminate some of the significance of catching a bad dice streak early in the game.

Alternatively, you can leave the castles where they are, and create a one way attack in through the wall (i.e., breached wall), which will create a more defensive challenge, but at the same time increase lead time to successful attacks because the would be assailant will need to have enough troops to plug two gaps rather than one to avoid being overrun by another player (could be less relevant for 1v1 but would be very interesting for >4 player games.
User avatar
Sergeant gdeangel
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:48 pm
Location: In the Basement

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby Androidz on Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:54 am

Here i will ask you set briges and such to make it no One way to citys:

Great Kingdom 4 to Hor 21.

Rebel 5 to Hor 20 or Tri 12.

Move Barbarian castle to Barbarian 3/6. Then Create a brige to the old Barbarian castle to Cen 14.

Consider moveing Hor Village to 13/16 if you do the one above.

Ga'h 9/10 to Tri 2/1.



If you to this there will only be 3 citites with with one way city but they aint so close to the willage so it isint a big problem. I hope you consider this gimil=)



Hmm maybe i should drop out that a name change would be good. What about Feudal Emperies, Fuedal Kingdoms or something? Fuedal War Kingdom of **** / Fuedal War Chapter 2. ???
Image
User avatar
Private Androidz
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:03 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby MrBenn on Wed Sep 03, 2008 5:40 pm

I'm going to ask for the legend to be at the top of the map rather than the bottom...
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
Lieutenant MrBenn
 
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby yeti_c on Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:34 am

MrBenn wrote:I'm going to ask for the legend to be at the top of the map rather than the bottom...


Why?

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby hulmey on Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:33 am

It looks so much like the original..Cant you add some new features to make it slightly different, like the AoR series for example...
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby gimil on Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:37 am

hulmey wrote:It looks so much like the original..Cant you add some new features to make it slightly different, like the AoR series for example...


The point of this was to give an 8 player option to the Feudal gameplay, while Realm was intended to be a series of maps that differ in gameplay from each other. my plan is to not add any new gimmicks to this map :)
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby Incandenza on Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:47 am

yeti_c wrote:
MrBenn wrote:I'm going to ask for the legend to be at the top of the map rather than the bottom...


Why?

C.


Benn has a point. It's easier to scroll down past the legend once you know the map rather than have it clutter the bottom... I made the same request for drug war.
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby yeti_c on Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:19 am

Incandenza wrote:
yeti_c wrote:
MrBenn wrote:I'm going to ask for the legend to be at the top of the map rather than the bottom...


Why?

C.


Benn has a point. It's easier to scroll down past the legend once you know the map rather than have it clutter the bottom... I made the same request for drug war.


It really ruins the aesthetics of the map though?

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby Ethitts on Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:42 am

yeti_c wrote:
Incandenza wrote:
yeti_c wrote:
MrBenn wrote:I'm going to ask for the legend to be at the top of the map rather than the bottom...


Why?

C.


Benn has a point. It's easier to scroll down past the legend once you know the map rather than have it clutter the bottom... I made the same request for drug war.


It really ruins the aesthetics of the map though?

C.


Sorry to be a pain, but I'd have to agree on the legend being better up the top. Along with the points stated above, I personally think it would be more aesthetically pleasing to.

Edit: it would also keep consistency with Feudal War
ImageImage
User avatar
Major Ethitts
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:53 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby yeti_c on Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:54 am

Ethitts wrote:
yeti_c wrote:
Incandenza wrote:
yeti_c wrote:
MrBenn wrote:I'm going to ask for the legend to be at the top of the map rather than the bottom...


Why?

C.


Benn has a point. It's easier to scroll down past the legend once you know the map rather than have it clutter the bottom... I made the same request for drug war.


It really ruins the aesthetics of the map though?

C.


Sorry to be a pain, but I'd have to agree on the legend being better up the top. Along with the points stated above, I personally think it would be more aesthetically pleasing to.

Edit: it would also keep consistency with Feudal War


Image

Completely disagree...

The legend is now above the title - this is shit.

C.

PS - you'll also have to ignore the faded landscape below the legend as that's from below.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby hulmey on Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:39 am

better the legend at the bottom!!!
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby Androidz on Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:28 am

yeti_c wrote:

Image

Completely disagree...

The legend is now above the title - this is shit.

C.

PS - you'll also have to ignore the faded landscape below the legend as that's from below.


Its better now on the top as long as you put the Title in the same "Legend Box" And on the top. And then the minimap below the legend as now. But the terretorie lines in legendbox is wrong now.


Again i had another suggestion above which you missed obliveously:(
Image
User avatar
Private Androidz
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:03 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby yeti_c on Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:30 am

Androidz wrote:Again i had another suggestion above which you missed obliveously:(


That's upto Gimil to respond to.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby Androidz on Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:33 am

yeti_c wrote:
Androidz wrote:Again i had another suggestion above which you missed obliveously:(


That's upto Gimil to respond to.

C.



kk:D thx for answearing:)
Image
User avatar
Private Androidz
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:03 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby gimil on Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:39 am

Androidz wrote:
yeti_c wrote:
Androidz wrote:Again i had another suggestion above which you missed obliveously:(


That's upto Gimil to respond to.

C.



kk:D thx for answearing:)


Firstly, I see no real gain in moving the legends to the top, seems like extra work for no gain. It looks prettier and for inclusive at the bottom.

On your double entrance idea, at the moment I thing that people are sitting 50/50 on the subject, for this reason I will stick with the 1 entrance, since that was my intention from the start :)
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby Androidz on Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:43 am

gimil wrote:
Androidz wrote:
yeti_c wrote:
Androidz wrote:Again i had another suggestion above which you missed obliveously:(


That's upto Gimil to respond to.

C.



kk:D thx for answearing:)


Firstly, I see no real gain in moving the legends to the top, seems like extra work for no gain. It looks prettier and for inclusive at the bottom.

On your double entrance idea, at the moment I thing that people are sitting 50/50 on the subject, for this reason I will stick with the 1 entrance, since that was my intention from the start :)


Okey Well if you ever change you mind about those attackroutes you got my post in here somwhere.^^
Image
User avatar
Private Androidz
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:03 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby Androidz on Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:56 am

Btw you got a terretorie in Hor not named above 12 and 11:O
Image
User avatar
Private Androidz
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:03 am

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby bryguy on Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:08 pm

Looks good :)

1) I dont really like how there is so much water :(
2) the villages look different somehow than the ones in the original feudal.
3) I dont like the cliffs that much right now.... they just dont seem as good as the ones in the original
4) Maybe instead of being able to bombard non-adjacent territories in their kingdom, maybe have 1 catapult territory in each kingdom that can bombard some areas in the valley below the cliff right on the edge of their kingdom?
4) Cen rocks!
Corporal bryguy
 
Posts: 4381
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:50 am
Location: Lost in a Jigsaw

Re: Feudal-ate *The sequal to Feudal War!*

Postby gimil on Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:47 pm

bryguy wrote:Looks good :)

1) I dont really like how there is so much water :(
2) the villages look different somehow than the ones in the original feudal.
3) I dont like the cliffs that much right now.... they just dont seem as good as the ones in the original
4) Maybe instead of being able to bombard non-adjacent territories in their kingdom, maybe have 1 catapult territory in each kingdom that can bombard some areas in the valley below the cliff right on the edge of their kingdom?
4) Cen rocks!


1) Their is hardly any water?
2) Becasue its a new map...
3) There are by far an improvement, these ones look ALOT more like cliffs than any previous attempt. :)
4) You wouldnt have your catapult outside the castle, thats just silly!
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

PreviousNext

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron