morph wrote:not sure if it is posted but umm antarctic.. you get no bonus from it.. so whats the point of it having its own color or it being mentioned that you get no bonus from it... make it part of Australia... the claim goes to the area and such for the bonus...
AndyDufresne wrote:Zim, could you make the line connecting Java and Sumatra clear? It is a faded line.
Also, what about the discussion of making SA 8, and the Far East 3? I remember some of that was floating around.
Could you also look into making the Italy/Greece area clearer? It looks almost as if they are borders, but they in fact aren't, correct? Play around with the placement of the army shadow...or perhaps you could skew Italy a little.
Another area to look into, the Afghanistan/China area. Could you make it even more obvious that they don't touch?
Lastly, could you erase a little more of the black border around Taiwan, to clear up any confusion about it being Blue?
Lupo wrote:So you didn't find any better solution for Moskva-Norway connection than erase it complitely?
casper wrote:Any chance you can move the word Panama from the right to the left so it's under the word Guatemala? Would make it more obvious which is which. Right now the word Panama is north of the word Guatemala even though Panama is south of Guatemala. Otherwise it looks great. Excellent map even if it is a bit frustrating.
sully800 wrote:Another problem I have is with the Phillippines. I know that the central indonesia label has a connecting line, but its so close to the Phillippines I have deployed to the wrong country many times. Moving either label down might solve the problem, or maybe its just me.
Coleman wrote:Change the 2.0 to 2.1 next time you update your changes to the map.
baglieg wrote:In world 2.0, the continent outlines were drawn from a Robinson projection, which has curved meridians, but some of the territory borders appear to have been drawn from something like a Mercator projection with straight meridians.
So the borders in Australia and between Papua and Sarong, which are all more or less North/South, should be slanted to match the way the Robinson projection distorts the continents near the corners of the map.
Otherwise the borders meet the sea at all the wrong places, which just looks weird because, among other things, it puts Melbourne and Hobart in the wrong third of the continent.
dunca122 wrote:s there anyway that the antartic could have a bonus for holding all 4 countries even if it's just 3 or 4 maybe.
AndyDufresne wrote:2 Minor things. The connection line between Sumatra and Java is a light line, as opposed to the darker variant.
Also, the Italy // Greece no border is better on the large map, but I'm almost afraid the numbers by hide the adjustment on the small. If possible, make it even more noticeable, either by adding more water in between then, or perhaps playing with the army shadow placement.
AndyDufresne wrote:Looks good! As always, post links to the large and the small and the xml.
AndyDufresne wrote:And do you want the new name to be World 2.1?
SkyCaptain wrote:So how does this all affect games currently being played? Or will it only affect games that are started?
Wisse wrote:can you make the name bolivia better in the tiny version its horrible to read more than boli
Molacole wrote:Hey zim are territory bonuses up for discussion? I play this map a lot and think a few of them could be changed to help balance the map out some.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests