Conquer Club

WWII:Poland [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Gameplay

Postby samuelc812 on Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:00 pm

qwert wrote:Well these is mine last post in these topic.


Ok qwert thanks for your advice on the flag, i did take onboard your advice and i am working to get the proper flag on the map ;)

Thanks,
samuelc812
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWII: The Invasion of Poland -V4- 7/2/09

Postby cairnswk on Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:16 pm

Click image to enlarge.
image

Sam. continued nice development. :)
I am a little concerned about the gameplay.
You have 8 starting points which (and forgive me if i have got this incorrect) can't be attacked because of the imapssable wire, but they can attack one-way outwardly.
Does this mean that each starter can't be eliminated? Or am i missing something.
If so, you could have another "Das Schloss" on your hands.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWII: The Invasion of Poland -V4- 7/2/09

Postby samuelc812 on Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:21 pm

cairnswk wrote:
Click image to enlarge.
image

Sam. continued nice development. :)
I am a little concerned about the gameplay.
You have 8 starting points which (and forgive me if i have got this incorrect) can't be attacked because of the imapssable wire, but they can attack one-way outwardly.
Does this mean that each starter can't be eliminated? Or am i missing something.
If so, you could have another "Das Schloss" on your hands.


Thanks for commenting cairnswk :)

The Polish Air Force (P.A.F) in the centre of poland is the only way to attack Commenders outside of Poland, you must get to the P.A.F before you can eliminate somebody ;) It's explained in the Legend up the top ;)
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWII: The Invasion of Poland -V4- 7/2/09

Postby cairnswk on Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:33 pm

samuelc812 wrote:....
The Polish Air Force (P.A.F) in the centre of poland is the only way to attack Commenders outside of Poland, you must get to the P.A.F before you can eliminate somebody ;) It's explained in the Legend up the top ;)

:oops: didn't make the connection.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Gameplay

Postby Teflon Kris on Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:21 pm

The PAF is the clearly the essential territory on this map.

In my opinion that would make for a gameplay style which isn't present on many maps. A great feature.

This would be a good map in fog of war, where the planes and tanks become key territories to clear a bit of fog. Nice.

Maybe worth editing the test about autodeploy to "Each Commander" - some players might think you have to hold all ten for the +3 (although they'd realise it is for each on their first go)?

The tricky thing to work out is whether the neutral values are ok so that the starting positions aren't too dissimilar to be able to advance from - it seems fine at first glance though.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Teflon Kris
 
Posts: 4236
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Gameplay

Postby LED ZEPPELINER on Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:10 am

does edward attack so4 and pco3, or just pco3
sailorseal wrote:My big boy banana was out the whole time :D
AndyDufresne wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Many Happy Bananas to everyone, lets party...with Bananas.
--Andy
Forever linked at the hip's-banana! (That sounds strange, don't quote me.)
Sergeant LED ZEPPELINER
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:09 pm

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Gameplay

Postby killerpit4e on Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:12 pm

hey sam i will do the xml for the map for ya
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class killerpit4e
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: usa

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Gameplay

Postby owenshooter on Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:34 pm

i appreciate the change of the older german emblems to the cross... nice move. looking very good.-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Lieutenant owenshooter
 
Posts: 13051
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Gameplay

Postby Joodoo on Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:11 am

I think there should be other methods to bombard/attack the commander (ex.include an objective)
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.

And if they dont suck then they blow.

:D
User avatar
Lieutenant Joodoo
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:19 am
Location: Greater Toronto, Canada

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Gameplay

Postby captainwalrus on Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:31 pm

Joodoo wrote:I think there should be other methods to bombard/attack the commander (ex.include an objective)

There are 14 territories that can attack the commander so I think that is enough.

I think the bonus for the commander should be a little less though, perhaps +4, and it should be aoutodeploy. This makes it slightly less valuable, but still key. Also, the bonus should be auto-deploy, it just seems to make more scence.






~Mr. Walrus
~ CaptainWalrus
User avatar
Private 1st Class captainwalrus
 
Posts: 1018
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Finnmark

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Gameplay

Postby Joodoo on Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:45 am

captainwalrus wrote:
Joodoo wrote:I think there should be other methods to bombard/attack the commander (ex.include an objective)

There are 14 territories that can attack the commander so I think that is enough.

I think the bonus for the commander should be a little less though, perhaps +4, and it should be aoutodeploy. This makes it slightly less valuable, but still key. Also, the bonus should be auto-deploy, it just seems to make more scence.






~Mr. Walrus


sry, I meant the non-Polish commanders
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.

And if they dont suck then they blow.

:D
User avatar
Lieutenant Joodoo
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:19 am
Location: Greater Toronto, Canada

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Gameplay

Postby captainwalrus on Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:37 am

Like that the P.A.F is the only way to attack other commanders. IT makes it so people are forced to try and take the treacherous trip into Poland and risk losing a lot.



~ Mr.Walrus
~ CaptainWalrus
User avatar
Private 1st Class captainwalrus
 
Posts: 1018
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Finnmark

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Gameplay

Postby samuelc812 on Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:18 pm

LED ZEPPELINER wrote:does edward attack so4 and pco3, or just pco3

Just PC03, do you think it is too unclear?
Joodoo wrote:I think there should be other methods to bombard/attack the commander (ex.include an objective)

As has already been discussed, it needs to be appealing to make the advance into Poland, if planes could bombard/attack Polish Commanders than i doubt anyone would ever get into Poland

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RE: German Flag Concerns

I have looked around and the Nazi Swastika is the National Flag of Germany during this attack, since we can't use the swastika, this map will have to be rendered historically inaccurate, but that's life. The following flags are the other options available, I have set up a poll, please vote :)

Also if you are a WWII expert or German expert and you know of a flag i can't find, please let me know ;)

Option A: Imperial German Flag WWI
Image
Option B: German National Flag 1933 - 1935
Image
Option C: National Flag of Germany : The C-Pennant 1946-1949
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Germany_(1946-1949).svg
Option D: German National Flag 1949 - present
Image
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Flag Poll

Postby thenobodies80 on Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:45 am

I suppose you could use the symbol that the nazi-german troops had on the vehicles.
So, you can be historically accurate ;)

http://www.modellismopiu.it/UserFiles/Image/AnteprimeArticoli/ant_275.jpg
http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/2199/bf7bn9.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Bunker/8757/PZ2.jpg

TNBDS
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thenobodies80
 
Posts: 5400
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
Location: Milan

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Flag Poll

Postby Qwert on Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:09 am

here me again,you can use Symbol of Wermacht(German Army during WWII),but then you need to change ,and that instead Flags Use Military Symbols of Soviet Union,Poland,Slovakia,because these will be correct.
For now your choices to people vote,its a little Insulting,because you use present FlaG of Germany(if im a german these will be very insulting for me now)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wermacht
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Army
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Army
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Flag Poll

Postby samuelc812 on Wed Apr 08, 2009 3:44 pm

qwert wrote:here me again,you can use Symbol of Wermacht(German Army during WWII),but then you need to change ,and that instead Flags Use Military Symbols of Soviet Union,Poland,Slovakia,because these will be correct.
For now your choices to people vote,its a little Insulting,because you use present FlaG of Germany(if im a german these will be very insulting for me now)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wermacht
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Army
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Army


That's exactly what i was looking for in a response qwert ;) Thankyou so much :)
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Flag Poll

Postby iancanton on Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:48 pm

qwert wrote:you can use Symbol of Wermacht(German Army during WWII)

i like this one the most. it was actually used in ww2, unlike any of the german flags shown above.

ian. :)
Image
User avatar
Colonel iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
 
Posts: 2423
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V5- 18/3/09 - Flag Poll

Postby gimil on Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:15 am

I don't really have time just now to go back and read but can someone (sam maybe?) give me a summary of the concerns behind actually using the swaztika?

Cheers.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: WWII: The Invasion of Poland -V4- 7/2/09

Postby samuelc812 on Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:49 pm

MrBenn wrote:
samuelc812 wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:Just a question, so please don't freak out on me here, but can you "get away with" the swastika? I think there is a law in Germany forbiding anything Nazi...


We're not in Germany so i doubt it matters ;)

Actually, I think it does matter, because of the global reach of the site.... While I appreciate the historical accuracy of using the swastika, and while I personally don't object to its use in this context, I still think it would be appropriate to use an alternative symbol if possible. I not sure if there is any official CC policy on this [I'll make some enquiries], but the policy of sites such as eBay indicates that a change may be required...

Wikipedia wrote:
Because of its use by Hitler and the Nazis and, in modern times, by neo-Nazis and other hate groups, the swastika is largely associated with Nazism and white supremacy in most of the Western countries. As a result, all of its use, or its use as a Nazi or hate symbol is prohibited in some jurisdictions. Because of the stigma attached to the symbol, many buildings that have contained the symbol as decoration have had the symbol removed. Westerners whose family originates from India, including religions such as Jain, Hindu and other Indian religions, still use the swastika as a religious symbol, with no connection to Nazism, although not without being accused of cultural insensitivity.

The official confirmation...
MrBenn wrote:Further to the swastika debate, I have had confirmation that the symbol should not be used on any CC maps. This represents official CC policy, and is not open to negotiation. Please use the German cross instead.


There were a lot more comments about it but these are the most important, and i completely understand, which is why it will be changed to
qwert wrote:Symbol of Wermacht(German Army during WWII)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wermacht
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V6- 12/4/09

Postby samuelc812 on Sun Apr 12, 2009 2:47 am

Changes V6:
  • All Commander Symbols have been changed to correct military WWII symbols
  • Different bullet holes on title
  • Changed Arrows

Version 6
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V6- 12/4/09

Postby gho on Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:30 am

You have to clarify more the difference between the P.A.F symbol and the other symbols (maybe colour the symbols differently or something). I also think this map looks dull, it looks like you've left this map in the sun too long and its faded. I think you should brighten it up.
Lieutenant gho
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:13 am

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V6- 12/4/09

Postby Qwert on Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:05 pm

First i must say that im satisfy that you apply mine sugestions abouth Military Symbols,its good and totaly correct.
Only small things-Stars in red army symbol need to be more centralised.

Lets speak abouth gameplay,if i understand correctly first who take P.A.F can bombard all commanders? These can be very advantage for first who take P.A.F,because some players is in big disantvage.
-Fedor Won Bock have best way to P>A>F.
-Edvard Eudz Smigly is in worst situation,and who start in these are,its best to take pistol and commit suicide
-Kovalev is in same situation like Edvard.
-All others is in much better situation.

Now i need to ask,its these you create on purpose,that some player start in hard situation,and some players have great start.
I belive that you need to change things,because now map is unbalanced to much.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V6- 12/4/09

Postby samuelc812 on Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:41 pm

qwert wrote:First i must say that im satisfy that you apply mine sugestions abouth Military Symbols,its good and totaly correct.
Only small things-Stars in red army symbol need to be more centralised.

Lets speak abouth gameplay,if i understand correctly first who take P.A.F can bombard all commanders? These can be very advantage for first who take P.A.F,because some players is in big disantvage.
-Fedor Won Bock have best way to P>A>F.
-Edvard Eudz Smigly is in worst situation,and who start in these are,its best to take pistol and commit suicide
-Kovalev is in same situation like Edvard.
-All others is in much better situation.

Now i need to ask,its these you create on purpose,that some player start in hard situation,and some players have great start.
I belive that you need to change things,because now map is unbalanced to much.


Actually qwert, each player has an even chance of getting to the P.A.F ;) Tanks can attack up to 2 regions away, each Commander has access to their own tank which can attack the P.A.F, so everyone has equal access to the P.A.F ;)
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V6- 12/4/09

Postby Qwert on Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:51 pm

Actually qwert, each player has an even chance of getting to the P.A.F Tanks can attack up to 2 regions away, each Commander has access to their own tank which can attack the P.A.F, so everyone has equal access to the P.A.F

You mean he can jump for 2 territory every tank?
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: WWII:Poland [D] -V6- 12/4/09

Postby samuelc812 on Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm

qwert wrote:
Actually qwert, each player has an even chance of getting to the P.A.F Tanks can attack up to 2 regions away, each Commander has access to their own tank which can attack the P.A.F, so everyone has equal access to the P.A.F

You mean he can jump for 2 territory every tank?


It's the same as the Cavalry on 'Waterloo', yes tanks can range their assault up to 2 regions away, so that each commander has equal chance to reach the P.A.F.
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users