[Official] Centerscape/Midgard REVAMP [Quenched]

[WidowMakers]

and here they are

Large V13

Small V8

[hecter]

Much nicer. I have nothing left to add... I think it's done...

[RjBeals]

Much nicer. I have nothing left to add... I think it's done...

same. nice work

[MrBenn]

Rouse then Foundry; Rally round the Stamper;
Ready, steady, pass the word along...
Onwards! Forward! Shout a load "BANANA"
Quench this map before it's been too long!

[rishaed]

Rouse then Foundry; Rally round the Stamper;
Ready, steady, pass the word along...
Onwards! Forward! Shout a load "BANANA"
Quench this map before it's been too long!

Yes, I agree and am completely happy with this map, and give my approval....not that it means much

[hecter]

Shortest final forge ever?

[MrBenn]

Is it just me, or is there no XML link?

I'd like to have a look at the XML for my own peace of mind... we want the changeover to go smoothly

[WidowMakers]

Its just you MrBenn. Everything is on the 1st page.

XML V6
http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/6/15/ ... rd_v06.xml
Large V13

Small V8

XML TEST
Large

Small

[LED ZEPPELINER]

there are a few places where the 888's are over the line, and they don't need to be: Gul, Luce, Zuto, Monroe, Karta is over the mountains, Iron Hills, Rotweed, and Una. I would move all of these just a few pixels so they are off the line.

[yeti_c]

When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?

C.

[MrBenn]

When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?

C.

I know we worked out the territory mapping (ie old to new), and while I have every faith that WM has got it right, that's what I'm going to double-check later tonight...

[rishaed]

When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?

C.

I know we worked out the territory mapping (ie old to new), and while I have every faith that WM has got it right, that's what I'm going to double-check later tonight...

I know you did earlier in this thread I just don't want to take the time to find it

[yeti_c]

When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?

C.

I know we worked out the territory mapping (ie old to new), and while I have every faith that WM has got it right, that's what I'm going to double-check later tonight...

Good stuff Benn...

Let me know if you need a hand.

C.

[WidowMakers]

there are a few places where the 888's are over the line, and they don't need to be: Gul, Luce, Zuto, Monroe, Karta is over the mountains, Iron Hills, Rotweed, and Una. I would move all of these just a few pixels so they are off the line.

I will not be changing the XML to make the 888 look good. If I change the position to make the 888 look good, the 88 will look bad. The only reason I am showing the 888 is that Andy asked to see them to make sure the numbers did not cover any territory names. I will post the 88 image to show what that looks like if it is felt needed.

Basically:

88- needs to look good
888-only need to ensure no letter coverage (not required to look good)

When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?

What????

WM

[hecter]

When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?

What????

WM

How about an example?

<name>a</name>
<name>b</name>
<name>c</name>

a is now 2
b is now 1
c is now 3.

<name>2</name>
<name>1</name>
<name>3</name>