Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators
LED ZEPPELINER wrote:i think it is better without army circles, the army circles detract from the bright and colourful feel of the map
LED ZEPPELINER wrote:i think it is better without army circles, the army circles detract from the bright and colourful feel of the map
oaktown wrote:LED ZEPPELINER wrote:i think it is better without army circles, the army circles detract from the bright and colourful feel of the map
show us a map with examples of both and we can make an informed decision
LED ZEPPELINER wrote:oaktown wrote:LED ZEPPELINER wrote:i think it is better without army circles, the army circles detract from the bright and colourful feel of the map
show us a map with examples of both and we can make an informed decision
there are the examples on the first page

yeti_c wrote:LED ZEPPELINER wrote:oaktown wrote:LED ZEPPELINER wrote:i think it is better without army circles, the army circles detract from the bright and colourful feel of the map
show us a map with examples of both and we can make an informed decision
there are the examples on the first page
They're not technically the correct 88's I don't think?!
C.

Blitzaholic wrote:little small, 29 lands? but like your effort, looking better
sailorseal wrote:My big boy banana was out the whole time
AndyDufresne wrote:Forever linked at the hip's-banana! (That sounds strange, don't quote me.)AndyDufresne wrote:Many Happy Bananas to everyone, lets party...with Bananas.
--Andy
lgoasklucyl wrote:C'mon foundry, help me out a bit here
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests