ender,ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:porkenbeans wrote:Yes, the coordinates is the main sugg. The rest is just Photoshop playfulness.Industrial Helix wrote:I wouldn't make any graphics changes, the coordinates fit fine on the current map and there is no reason why the sea of Japan needs to be represented by a dreadnought in a puddle ... but I think there is something to be said about the location of the coordinates. I wasn't going to say anything because, honestly, it doesn't bug me and it works either way. It's not a matter of clarity but rather preference. Your call Red.
coord changes I could get behind.
I, too, think a lot of the coordinate changes look good, but I wonder how many of them would work on the small map. Currently the small map is working using what looks like the same size text as the large, and I know porkenbeans and I both appreciate text that is not too small. So the question is, would having the labels in different locations on the large and small maps cause confusion?
here it is at 90%, small enough for the small version. I threw up some numbers on some of the smallest territs. It looks to me that they will work fine matched up to the alt. coords.
Gee porken. Why didn't ya just use a freaking aircraft carrier? It could be worth 5 bonus.
RBO as far as I'm concerned yours was good to go with a couple tweeks already mentioned. But the coordinate positioning pb did looks good.
Well, how about two or three more and make then an additional bonus area.