Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators
Basically for my maps I take my large psd file and save a version without the territory text, army circles and sometimes the legend and legend text (depending on the amount of wording and detail). I then resize the small to about 80% of the large and import the image to resize. I then bring the large sized layers over from the large psd file. That way teh circles are not smaller and the text is the same. Even though you will still need to tweak teh text (try 90% smaller to start) it will not shrink the same rate as the rest of the map.lanyards wrote:Scott-Land wrote:cairnswk wrote:Scott-land...what can i say, very nice indeed.![]()
The only small issue i have is will the map still have the same legibility and clarity for territory names etc, when it is in it's small version size?
I'm in favour of moving it to the foundry.
I certainly can't complain about my experience here in the foundry. So nice to see all the veteran map makers [and everyone] in here giving solid advice and being so helpful. Thx Cairns.
I'm wondering if there's another way to resize the image without getting it distorted. I haven't done much with the small version. Actually I haven't done anything at all but resize it to get a perspective. I do lose ALL my lines and borders (well no I get them in triplicate)- is there another way to resize outside of Image Size in PS without sacrificing legibility ? I'm afraid the answer's gonna be to basically redo the whole thing. ?!

WidowMakers wrote:Basically for my maps I take my large psd file and save a version without the territory text, army circles and sometimes the legend and legend text (depending on the amount of wording and detail). I then resize the small to about 80% of the large and import the image to resize. I then bring the large sized layers over from the large psd file. That way teh circles are not smaller and the text is the same. Even though you will still need to tweak teh text (try 90% smaller to start) it will not shrink the same rate as the rest of the map.lanyards wrote:Scott-Land wrote:cairnswk wrote:Scott-land...what can i say, very nice indeed.![]()
The only small issue i have is will the map still have the same legibility and clarity for territory names etc, when it is in it's small version size?
I'm in favour of moving it to the foundry.
I certainly can't complain about my experience here in the foundry. So nice to see all the veteran map makers [and everyone] in here giving solid advice and being so helpful. Thx Cairns.
I'm wondering if there's another way to resize the image without getting it distorted. I haven't done much with the small version. Actually I haven't done anything at all but resize it to get a perspective. I do lose ALL my lines and borders (well no I get them in triplicate)- is there another way to resize outside of Image Size in PS without sacrificing legibility ? I'm afraid the answer's gonna be to basically redo the whole thing. ?!
Hope this helps.
WM
P.S. Since your borders are 1 pixel thick, you will need to redo them in teh small version since they will not scale properly.
iancanton wrote:moved into the main foundry. onward and upward!
ian.

Tisha wrote:iancanton wrote:moved into the main foundry. onward and upward!
ian.
getting there
you caught up with me
better not pass me

MrBenn wrote:I've been paying a passing interest on the development of this map, but haven't found the time to come in and say what a good job you're doing
Graphically, there is very little to pick fault with; the primary task from here is to iron out the gameplay side of things... once you've got that done, then I can see things progressing fairly swiftly.
It's 1am for me now, so I'll refrain from having an in depth look until my brain is functioning a little more normally!



lt_oddball wrote:I don't know Chicago, but you had me confused with "el train" being a hispenglish word; "el" "train". Some sort of joke towards the hispanic immigrant community in Chicago ?.
If EL is short for express line or something, please indicate so.
Or shorter "E.L.T." with the dots...

Blitzaholic wrote:Wow Scotty, excellent work for a first version, ad the graphics are outstanding.
3 Questions though
1. where is wrigley park? or did you not want that with chicago map?
2. why red, blue and orange colors for train bonus? why not red, blue, green?
3. how many territories? 55 or so?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests