Forum

by **Kabanellas** on Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:11 am

I got another option for the legend board. More dynamic and intuitive, but maybe, less old parchment style..... (took it from the schematic guide i've posted in pg1)

What do you guys think?

Click image to enlarge.

by **natty dread** on Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:46 am

Yes! That's great! Use them.

by **AndrewB** on Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:26 am

Dwarves Gateway can attack the adjacent territory too, it should be reflected in the schematics.

by **natty dread** on Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:31 am

Yes, a two way arrow next to the gateway would make it ultra-clear to anyone.

by **Kabanellas** on Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:06 pm

Guys, 2 arrows pointing each way:
(poor map, I'm done with changes)

Click image to enlarge.

by **ender516** on Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:29 pm

I first peeked in at this map a while ago and was a little confused the dwarvish territories, but I see you have thrashed it out over the past few pages. The schematic is an excellent solution. Might I suggest that the red text by the dots read "underground passage" rather than "underground passways". I don't think "passways" is even a word, but if it is, it is much less common than "passage" in this context.
If anyone still has a problem with the one way attack from the stronghold, you could put a single red arrow pointing out, to mirror the double-headed arrow of the gateway. Then all the dwarvish warpaths would be bathed in blood, so to speak.

by **Kabanellas** on Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:31 am

ender516 wrote:I first peeked in at this map a while ago and was a little confused the dwarvish territories, but I see you have thrashed it out over the past few pages. The schematic is an excellent solution. Might I suggest that the red text by the dots read "underground passage" rather than "underground passways". I don't think "passways" is even a word, but if it is, it is much less common than "passage" in this context.
If anyone still has a problem with the one way attack from the stronghold, you could put a single red arrow pointing out, to mirror the double-headed arrow of the gateway. Then all the dwarvish warpaths would be bathed in blood, so to speak.

yes to both !

by **natty dread** on Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:39 am

Btw, you should be submitting the XML for the XML check in the appropriate thread (stickied on this forum).

this thread -> viewtopic.php?f=64&t=50034

by **Kabanellas** on Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:57 pm

Thanks for reminding me Natty! I'll do that.

by **MrBenn** on Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:21 am

Kabanellas wrote:
ender516 wrote:I first peeked in at this map a while ago and was a little confused the dwarvish territories, but I see you have thrashed it out over the past few pages. The schematic is an excellent solution. Might I suggest that the red text by the dots read "underground passage" rather than "underground passways". I don't think "passways" is even a word, but if it is, it is much less common than "passage" in this context.
If anyone still has a problem with the one way attack from the stronghold, you could put a single red arrow pointing out, to mirror the double-headed arrow of the gateway. Then all the dwarvish warpaths would be bathed in blood, so to speak.

yes to both !

'Underground Pass' works equally well - it takes up less room too, so wouldn't look so squeezed in.

In other news...