WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

[yeti_c]

Congratulations Qwert...

I never thought I would see the day!!

C.

[Forza AZ]

Congratulations with this new map. Just checked the XML to make sure and didn't find any mistakes (like there were at the last new maps), so I will start a few games in a moment. Always nice to have a new map.

[Teya]

As concern of Extrabonuses,vell first i have some opinion that Bonuses is high(3 army for 3 terittory) and if game start with only 2 player somebody will get bonuses right in begining.Also to many player say that bonuses for russian is high and in these way i balanced that nobody can been in favorise begining,so everybody have same chance in start of game.

I dont think that starting the 3 territories as neutral is the problem. The problem is that there are 6 neutral. In a way, I think you may have made that side of the map weaker as it is harder to get any bonuses because you have to take on a neutral 6.

[hulmey]

i agree with Teya..Neutrels are a bitch to kill.

Think you should leave it at 3 not 6!!!

[gimil]

qwerts i never thought id see it in my life time

congratz

[hulmey]

3 more pages and its at number 150 folks

[Ruben Cassar]

I dont remember neutral 6's being discussed either. It is something that should have been brought up and may even need to be revised.

I think they should be 3 and not 6. It's not worth the hassle to break 6. Change them to 3 qwert...it's better for gameplay purposes.

[qwert]

Well you dont know when you dont se,you all right, i will change these to be 3.

[snufkin]

[Coleman]

As qwert requested xml update web hosted:
http://members.cox.net/gyrigo/CC/EastFront2.xml

Hopefully the right people find it soon.

[Geoster]

This probably won't be a popular suggestion, but I think the map was better before taking the neutrals down to 3. Granted, when I saw those 6s, I was like, "this map is totally unfair," but having had a chance to play some on both sides of the change, I think the map had a much more interesting feel with the 6s.

Having only 3 attractive territories meant there was alot of action in the West, but it was still possible for a player to build strength in Russia while most everybody else fought over the German armies. It's kind of like the players were a disorganized German force trying to regroup in hostile Russian terrain, or else they were a decimated Russian force fighting off Germans with inferior numbers. Now it plays like pretty much every other map. Moreover, having neutral 3s in your territories is actually an advantage over having enemy troops alot of the time, making the superior Russian bonuses seem a little unbalanced now.

My personal recommendation would be to make the Russian capitals start with neutral 5s. I think that would be the best balance point. But I don't know. Is there any support for this sentiment?

G

[qwert]

Well geoster,you read what people say,and also i se same thing,people dont try to conquer Russian Country,and go only for German Country.

[Molacole]

good job!

[fireedud]

Congratz qwert

[qwert]

Thanks molacole and fireedud