Conquer Club

Congratulations Qwert...

I never thought I would see the day!!

C.

Congratulations with this new map. Just checked the XML to make sure and didn't find any mistakes (like there were at the last new maps), so I will start a few games in a moment. Always nice to have a new map.

qwert wrote:As concern of Extrabonuses,vell first i have some opinion that Bonuses is high(3 army for 3 terittory) and if game start with only 2 player somebody will get bonuses right in begining.Also to many player say that bonuses for russian is high and in these way i balanced that nobody can been in favorise begining,so everybody have same chance in start of game.

I dont think that starting the 3 territories as neutral is the problem. The problem is that there are 6 neutral. In a way, I think you may have made that side of the map weaker as it is harder to get any bonuses because you have to take on a neutral 6.

i agree with Teya..Neutrels are a bitch to kill.

Think you should leave it at 3 not 6!!!

qwerts i never thought id see it in my life time

congratz

3 more pages and its at number 150 folks

Teya wrote:I dont remember neutral 6's being discussed either. It is something that should have been brought up and may even need to be revised.

I think they should be 3 and not 6. It's not worth the hassle to break 6. Change them to 3 qwert...it's better for gameplay purposes.

Well you dont know when you dont se,you all right, i will change these to be 3.

As qwert requested xml update web hosted:
http://members.cox.net/gyrigo/CC/EastFront2.xml

Hopefully the right people find it soon.

This probably won't be a popular suggestion, but I think the map was better before taking the neutrals down to 3. Granted, when I saw those 6s, I was like, "this map is totally unfair," but having had a chance to play some on both sides of the change, I think the map had a much more interesting feel with the 6s.

Having only 3 attractive territories meant there was alot of action in the West, but it was still possible for a player to build strength in Russia while most everybody else fought over the German armies. It's kind of like the players were a disorganized German force trying to regroup in hostile Russian terrain, or else they were a decimated Russian force fighting off Germans with inferior numbers. Now it plays like pretty much every other map. Moreover, having neutral 3s in your territories is actually an advantage over having enemy troops alot of the time, making the superior Russian bonuses seem a little unbalanced now.

My personal recommendation would be to make the Russian capitals start with neutral 5s. I think that would be the best balance point. But I don't know. Is there any support for this sentiment?

G

Well geoster,you read what people say,and also i se same thing,people dont try to conquer Russian Country,and go only for German Country.

good job!

Congratz qwert

Thanks molacole and fireedud

There's a spelling mistake: "Donets" should be "Donetsk" (note the k at the end) Also, "Tallin" has two Ns: "Tallinn"

But otherwise, seems like a great map, I'm just playing on it...

OMG! I've just come back to visit the forums after a month off and this is the best thing I've seen yet. WELL DONE qwert! (And before page 150 as well! ) Sorry if this is a few days late but I'm just so happy!

mno2go
There's a spelling mistake: "Donets" should be "Donetsk" (note the k at the end) Also, "Tallin" has two Ns: "Tallinn"

But otherwise, seems like a great map, I'm just playing on it...

Hmm,you new here,and you dont follow mine topic,
1.Donets and Donetsk is two diferent things.
2.As concerne of tallin,if you have time go back and you will find map with Russian names(Sarema is rusian name,and saaremma is original name,also Lvov is Lwow)All names in map is Russian translation to english,because all these terittory belong to USSr,

qwert wrote:Hmm,you new here,and you dont follow mine topic,
1.Donets and Donetsk is two diferent things.
2.As concerne of tallin,if you have time go back and you will find map with Russian names(Sarema is rusian name,and saaremma is original name,also Lvov is Lwow)All names in map is Russian translation to english,because all these terittory belong to USSr,

Yes, it's true. I didn't read the whole topic (a lot of pages ) I guess in response:

1. If you're referring to the region of Donetsk, then it's known as Donbass. I am not too sure historically, but I believe it was known as that since the times of the USSR. Which Donets are you referring to?

2. Lwow is actually not Russian, but Polish. That name stuck from the times of the Polish and Lithuanian empires. The Russian name has always been Lvov, and Ukrainian is Lviv. However, I don't argue about Tallin

Think man. Why olveys must be name of some country or town or region,some bigest battles will hepend on river to.

Good point

CONGRATZ

Finally we can play this amazing map!

Grtz
MarVal

yes well done qwert you deserved it

sorry about some of the tension between us before perhaps we could play on this map when i get back from my holiday in a couple of weeks

boberz



Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 742

Posted: 09 Aug 2007 17:14 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

yes well done qwert you deserved it

sorry about some of the tension between us before perhaps we could play on this map when i get back from my holiday in a couple of weeks

Forget it,and enjoy in game.

Sorry if this has been brought up already, but the first few games I played on this map had 6 neutrals on each capital, and I just started in another one where there are only 3 on each. What happened?