Page 5 of 28
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V2, page 6, 10/8/09)
Posted:
Fri Oct 09, 2009 4:41 pmby AndyDufresne
sully800 wrote:As for ships, planes, bullet holes etc. Wouldn't that just be adding clutter? And is copying the original classic in so many regards really a good idea? I think we are quickly devolving to a map that is not unique in any way and that scares me.
Right, I don't think this map needs very much for added fluff. Planes in the title like MrBenn created is about the limit of extra fluff I'd like to see.
--Andy
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V2, page 6, 10/8/09)
Posted:
Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:25 pmby MrBenn
AndyDufresne wrote:sully800 wrote:As for ships, planes, bullet holes etc. Wouldn't that just be adding clutter? And is copying the original classic in so many regards really a good idea? I think we are quickly devolving to a map that is not unique in any way and that scares me.
Right, I don't think this map needs very much for added fluff. Planes in the title like MrBenn created is about the limit of extra fluff I'd like to see.
I think we're all agreed... my mistake was to leave the <sarcasm> tags out of the following statement:
MrBenn wrote:You could put some ships in the water too... don't forget the random blob in Canada
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V2, page 6, 10/8/09)
Posted:
Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:19 pmby sully800
And away we go!
- Click image to enlarge.
- Reformatted Asia as stated earlier (switching out Chengdu and adding Yakutsk). I also switched Singapore to Bangkok to increase the space between Asia and Oceania
- Reformatted Oceania, switching Melbourne to Perth and Auckland to Manila. This was done because the connections to Auckland always looked awkward with only 4 Oceania territories. I chose Manila because there are no exceptionally large cities in New Guinea that I could think of.
- Turned off the globe bonuses and added in a simple list in the Pacific Ocean. This was possibly in part due to Auckland's disappearance which allowed me to shift the whole map to the right (and not cut off Alaska so much).
- New title in the style suggested by mibi and Benn. Let me know what you think, I understand that I probably worked 10 times as hard as they did to produce an inferior product.
I'm going to be away for the next 4 days (going backpacking in the Finger Lakes of upstate New York!) so I won't be responding to comments for a bit. Just the same, keep the conversation flowing!
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:32 pmby isaiah40
Nice clean, crisp, readable. I like it!
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:45 pmby mpjh
Yes, nice. 'cept for no paris.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:52 pmby Evil DIMwit
Looking closer and closer to the board game map... At what point are we vulnerable to copyright issues again?
Otherwise it's looking quite good, though I can't say I'm a fan of the planes. Weren't you going to redo the flag borders with the official flag icons? I'd've liked to see that.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:39 pmby Peter Gibbons
I won't get into the "should this really be the new classic" debate right now. Just offer my thoughts on the map as is:
I think Africa and South America are done. They look fine and I can't think of any changes or suggestions to improve them, really.
For North America, just a minor cosmetic change: invert the curve of either the Edmonton-Montreal or Edmonton-Chicago connection.
For Europe, I'm really not sure what to do. The Berlin-Istanbul connection isn't totally clear because of how close they are (that should signal to everyone how much worse Paris or Rome would make it!). I know there's not much room to maneuver, but something does need to be done there.
Asia and Oceania is definitely where the action is and where the debate needs to be had...
My first point is that Dubai should be Mecca. I know there will be differing opinions there, but I think a straight vote would lead to Mecca.
Second, Manila is a distinctly Asian city. I don't think it should be part of Oceania. For that matter, even Jakarta is questionable insofar as strict geography--but since Indonesia was clearly labeled in Oceania on the original Risk board, I don't think that's as big an issue (and yes, I know some Risk boards draw the Philippines into Oceania).
Third, the other issue I raised in the old thread is that using Magadan is a joke. It's just not a world city by any standard.
So, what are the solutions to these final two points? Again, I'm not totally sure.
For Oceania, I think you can either change Manila to Port Moresby (the simple solution) OR if people aren't too concerned about having the geographic correspondence to the old Risk map, you make Perth the entry point, then you use Sydney, Darwin and Auckland as the other three Oceania territories (or Darwin could be the entry point).
As for Asia itself, there are a number of possibilities. If you take my above suggestion about Australia, that frees up Jakarta and Manila to be used in Asia, which would then open up all sorts of options. You could then slide everything down south, make Seoul the connection to Anchorage, and play around with the internal Asian cities to see what would work best insofar as minimizing clutter (Shanghai, Dhaka and Lhasa could all be in play, depending on what you would want to remove and what connections would need to be made).
Anyway, that's just my (extended) 2 cents. In short, I'd say Africa and South America are done, North America is essentially done, Europe has one small problem that needs to be addressed, and the focus should really be on Oceania and Asia. Asia's the problem (I have a preference for Oceania, but I'll be honest and say that there are a number of viable options that work).
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V2, page 6, 10/8/09)
Posted:
Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:42 pmby Robinette
sully800 wrote:- Click image to enlarge.
- First off... Have fun backpacking in the Finger Lakes, i assume the leaves are in full color now in upstate NY...
- The reformatting is great... still wish we could have Seoul instead of Magadan, but can't see a way to do it...
- Please lose the jets.... it's all such a professional map, and then BAM, so please... lose the jets...
- I'm missing the globe bonuses and don't really like the simple list in the Pacific Ocean. Perhaps you could do the globes without writing the names of the continents... after all, there are just cities and the visual of the globe makes it very clear...
- Consider swapping the bonus colors... oceania for South America should do the trick... will really help to keep the asia / oceania bonuses clearly seperated...
- The lines connecting Magadan and Anchorage don't match... one is convex, the other is concave
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:47 pmby ender516
I miss the globes, too. Would it satisfy the clutter-killers if the Western Hemisphere globe was moved from the Atlantic to the Pacific, leaving the Eastern Hemisphere globe in the Indian Ocean?
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:59 amby stokesy7
This map looks like an awesome change, however, i think that it should have adelaide instead of perth
Stokesy
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:49 amby Bruceswar
stokesy7 wrote:This map looks like an awesome change, however, i think that it should have adelaide instead of perth
Stokesy
Adelaide does not work for Western Australia. Perth does though.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:05 amby cairnswk
Bruceswar wrote:stokesy7 wrote:This map looks like an awesome change, however, i think that it should have adelaide instead of perth
Stokesy
Adelaide does not work for Western Australia. Perth does though.
Nah, Cairns is the gateway to Asia...if you put Cairns on the map I'll love you forever of course,
Just get rid of Perth and Sydney and replace them with Port Morseby and Cairns.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:03 amby 00iCon
cairnswk wrote:Bruceswar wrote:stokesy7 wrote:This map looks like an awesome change, however, i think that it should have adelaide instead of perth
Stokesy
Adelaide does not work for Western Australia. Perth does though.
Nah, Cairns is the gateway to Asia...if you put Cairns on the map I'll love you forever of course,
Just get rid of Perth and Sydney and replace them with Port Morseby and Cairns.
Port Moresby only has strategic value in real life, it's no population center like Sydney!
ender516 wrote:I miss the globes, too. Would it satisfy the clutter-killers if the Western Hemisphere globe was moved from the Atlantic to the Pacific, leaving the Eastern Hemisphere globe in the Indian Ocean?
I also liked the idea of globes, but perhaps make them like digital like in star wars when they're breifing the pilots on destroying the death star. It goes with the jets in the title.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:58 amby saaimen
Then again, we should get rid of the jets, so...
(I like the simple white fading lines without them actually being steam trails.)
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:49 pmby AndyDufresne
I think I'm generally more in favor of the globes than not in favor of them.
Some excellent posts on this page with great feedback. Keep it coming.
--Andy
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:08 pmby Blitzaholic
WoW sully, this is looking excellent, thank you for all your efforts and hard work, I know many will be proud of this map and may become CC's most popular over time.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:11 pmby The Neon Peon
I am in favor of the globes and the old title (with or without jets).
I am also in favor of the flags, but there's no use beating a dead horse.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:27 pmby mibi
The jets creative cognitive discord, being that they are about to smash into each other, creating a loss of life.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V2, page 6, 10/8/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:34 pmby the.killing.44
sully800 wrote:I still like the idea of including the conquer club font, logo, colors in the title.
Shame, that. mibi's looks best IMO; you should rid the map of the chicken-playing planes.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:36 pmby ender516
The Neon Peon wrote:I am in favor of the globes and the old title (with or without jets).
I am also in favor of the flags, but there's no use beating a dead horse.
I didn't think the flags were gone for good yet. I would still like to see their return. If they seem too imposing, perhaps they could be reduced to half the old height, so that the entire set of flags could run across the top and bottom, instead of half on each. Of course, they might be too small to recognize then.
As far as the jets go, since this map roughly depicts air routes, perhaps they should be passenger jets, rather than fighters, and they could be shown flying outward rather than on a collision course.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:44 amby jiminski
why not have a single globe as the Legend in the left-hand corner, which alternates between Eastern and Western bonus' when the map refreshes.
That will avoid clutter whilst retaining this nice feature.
(you could also make your monster wink in the opposite corner...)
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:07 amby Bruceswar
jiminski wrote:why not have a single globe as the Legend in the left-hand corner, which alternates between Eastern and Western bonus' when the map refreshes.
That will avoid clutter whilst retaining this nice feature.
(you could also make your monster wink in the opposite corner...)
While that would be a nice touch I just do not think it is going to happen on CC.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:56 amby ender516
Bruceswar wrote:jiminski wrote:why not have a single globe as the Legend in the left-hand corner, which alternates between Eastern and Western bonus' when the map refreshes.
That will avoid clutter whilst retaining this nice feature.
(you could also make your monster wink in the opposite corner...)
While that would be a nice touch I just do not think it is going to happen on CC.
Say that's not really a bad idea, but it wouldn't require a change of map on refresh, which would require some special coding, I think. It could be done by using the animated GIF feature, like ConquerMan, n'est-ce pas? A slow fade from one globe to the other would give the new flagship map a little pizzazz.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:30 amby brian fletcher
Must say, an excellent map... Im sure will be the most popular map by far.
If it is to replace clasic shapes, as seems certain. Will there be abbreviations in the drop down box for all the territories? The reason for the question is because. We will be using this instead of classic shapes in society of the cooks, and would you want to have to spell out all these place names when instructing students? instead of A1, F4, S2 etc.... Maybe NY, for New York obviously. But JOH for Johannesburg. SAO for Sao Paulo.
Re: [Official] Classic Revamp (V3, page 8, 10/9/09)
Posted:
Sun Oct 11, 2009 11:30 amby mpjh
Still don't understand why you don't drop classic art - it has less players than shapes when compared over the same time period since art was created.