Conquer Club

ljex wrote:unless we want lack to spend more time playing games and less time coding...i think this is a stupid idea

>implying lack does any coding, at all

Army of GOD wrote:

ljex wrote:unless we want lack to spend more time playing games and less time coding...i think this is a stupid idea

>implying lack does any coding, at all

>Because the website looks exactly like it did back in 2006.

TheForgivenOne wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:

ljex wrote:unless we want lack to spend more time playing games and less time coding...i think this is a stupid idea

>implying lack does any coding, at all

>Because the website looks exactly like it did back in 2006.

does it??

sniff

its a bit of passive agressivness sniffie, it does NOT look like the 2006 version, and i can know...
as long as it does not look everyday like its valentine, its all good by me though.

SirSebstar wrote:its a bit of passive agressivness sniffie, it does NOT look like the 2006 version, and i can know...
as long as it does not look everyday like its valentine, its all good by me though.

True that.

3 victories against Lack backing this medal

I thought I'd note I modified the title slightly to better reflect the purpose of the thread (basically to represent that this is actually a suggestion, not a whine thread).

I like it.

And I agree with whoever said that if it got lack to play a few more games, then he would probably see things in the site that needed changed.

SirSebstar wrote:its a bit of passive agressivness sniffie, it does NOT look like the 2006 version, and i can know...
as long as it does not look everyday like its valentine, its all good by me though.

I know and agree.

sniff

Leave Lack Alone....

There are so many things he does for us that he can not get into our games. let Lack do what he does best!!

I like it

poll added

Let Lack code and not be harassed by countless numbers of people.

I don't see a point for this, as it will just cause more work for the webmaster, when he is currently in an important process of something.

TheForgivenOne wrote:I don't see a point for this, as it will just cause more work for the webmaster, when he is currently in an important process of something.

Playing 1 or 2 games at a time is not a big deal, especially when they are standard games. He would not even average a turn per day. And each turn would take about 30 seconds. He doesn't have a spare 3 minutes every week?

TheForgivenOne wrote:I don't see a point for this, as it will just cause more work for the webmaster, when he is currently in an important process of something.

playing Conquer Club is not a time consuming process. You can take your turn in 5 minutes with your morning cup of coffee or in between classes.

chapcrap wrote:

TheForgivenOne wrote:I don't see a point for this, as it will just cause more work for the webmaster, when he is currently in an important process of something.

Playing 1 or 2 games at a time is not a big deal, especially when they are standard games. He would not even average a turn per day. And each turn would take about 30 seconds. He doesn't have a spare 3 minutes every week?

Do you really think people will want him to stop at 1 or 2 games? I wouldn't see a reason for the medal if he only has such few medals being pushed out for this.

TheForgivenOne wrote:

chapcrap wrote:

TheForgivenOne wrote:I don't see a point for this, as it will just cause more work for the webmaster, when he is currently in an important process of something.

Playing 1 or 2 games at a time is not a big deal, especially when they are standard games. He would not even average a turn per day. And each turn would take about 30 seconds. He doesn't have a spare 3 minutes every week?

Do you really think people will want him to stop at 1 or 2 games? I wouldn't see a reason for the medal if he only has such few medals being pushed out for this.

I'm sure that people might want more, but it's not like he has to do this constantly. It's whenever he feels like playing a game.

And, the point of the medal is the exclusivity of beating lack. Just because it might be a low number given out doesn't mean there shouldn't be a medal. If that's the case, we might has well take away the Conqueror Medal.

I can't find lack on the scoreboard, but IIRC he's not rated that highly. Not really sure why a medal should be awarded for this. Now beating a sitting Conqueror ...

agentcom wrote:I can't find lack on the scoreboard, but IIRC he's not rated that highly. Not really sure why a medal should be awarded for this. Now beating a sitting Conqueror ...

because he owns this site.

it would be tongue in cheek for him to award us medals for defeating him that say he sucks at CC.

We could try another name that would include a broader scope of available targets, it's a bit unfair to make Lack the only source for this medal.

How about:
Volunteer Vanquisher
Administrator Annihilator
Cartographer Crusher
Multihunter's Bane
Chatter Smasher

Obviously there's more than 5 varieties of Mod/Admin here, so maybe we could have a medal for each category of Moderator slain in non-team games?

P.S. I'm surprised by the number of no votes, but that's probably centered around the original idea that only a game with Lack would be eligible for a medal.

Artimis wrote:We could try another name that would include a broader scope of available targets, it's a bit unfair to make Lack the only source for this medal.

How about:
Volunteer Vanquisher
Administrator Annihilator
Cartographer Crusher
Multihunter's Bane
Chatter Smasher

Obviously there's more than 5 varieties of Mod/Admin here, so maybe we could have a medal for each category of Moderator slain in non-team games?

P.S. I'm surprised by the number of no votes, but that's probably centered around the original idea that only a game with Lack would be eligible for a medal.

i suppose the op could be changed now to bigWham Sucks medal

greenoaks wrote:i suppose the op could be changed now to bigWham Sucks medal

Given bigWham's rank and general proficiency in the game, that would actually be a laudable achievement well beyond defeating lackattack.

And definitely more satisfying! Which would you rather brag about? Beating a Major or beating a Private?

If there was one for just Volunteers in general, I'll have handed out plenty...

How about only Admins? I like the idea of any volunteer/volunteer type, but I don't think it would be especially unique since there are so many of us. And if implemented, we would have to decide who we would like to count- there have been admins who have owned the site for a few weeks, and some for over a year. Would we use just BW, all owners, all admins, current admins and those that become admins from here on, or just lack?

JamesKer1 wrote:If there was one for just Volunteers in general, I'll have handed out plenty...

How about only Admins? I like the idea of any volunteer/volunteer type, but I don't think it would be especially unique since there are so many of us. And if implemented, we would have to decide who we would like to count- there have been admins who have owned the site for a few weeks, and some for over a year. Would we use just BW, all owners, all admins, current admins and those that become admins from here on, or just lack?

Yeah, lets keep it simple and go with "Admin's Bane" or "Bounty/Head Hunter" -have defeated an Admin in a non-team game.