Redefinition of the farming rule

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderators: Suggestions Team, Global Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby rockfist on Sun Feb 05, 2012 10:37 pm

I hope to win somewhat more than 50% (although realistically not more than 60). I am just cocky (stupid) enough to think I can.
Lowest Score 1,000, Highest Win Percentage - 100%.
User avatar
Colonel rockfist
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:17 pm
Medals: 66
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Bot Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (11)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby Woodruff on Sun Feb 05, 2012 10:46 pm

rockfist wrote:I hope to win somewhat more than 50% (although realistically not more than 60). I am just cocky (stupid) enough to think I can.


Ok, but you surely understand the point I'm making. <smile>
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby natty dread on Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:42 am

Why should it be illegal to play games you know you'll likely win?

I still haven't heard a good answer to this question.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: fucked off
Medals: 49
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (12) Map Contribution (12) General Contribution (7)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby Jippd on Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:11 am

natty_dread wrote:Why should it be illegal to play games you know you'll likely win?

I still haven't heard a good answer to this question.


Another good question is who would join or create a game that they don't think they will win?
User avatar
Colonel Jippd
 
Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:05 pm
Medals: 102
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Bot Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (15)
General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (17) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (11)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby MichelSableheart on Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:55 am

natty_dread wrote:So you want to give more power in the hands of the moderators to arbitrarily decide who gets punished and who doesn't?
No more power or arbitrariness then they already have. In the current farming rules, they have to determine the difference between occasional and systematic. They already have to determine what use of language is acceptable or unacceptable behaviour. Determining intent is of a similar magnitude, and can be expected from good, fair moderators. Whether or not we have those is another issue, that should not influence this discussion IMO.

rockfist wrote:I have gone on medal hunts often...when I want to get some points and I've been on a medal hunt I will "target" higher ranked players in speed games because I figure I am somewhere around 50% to win and the points differential is such that by winning 50% of those games I will win a lot more points than I lose. Would this constitute picking on a specific group of players and thus be farming?
Picking on a specific group of players isn't the only part of the proposed farming rule. There's also the "intent to take advantage" part. What you describe would probably be picking on a specific group of players, but without intent to take advantage, there's no problem.

natty_dread wrote:Why should it be illegal to play games you know you'll likely win?
Following the rules proposed, you're free to play whatever maps and settings you want, as long as you play all comers. It's not illegal to play games you know you'll likely win, it's illegal to systematically play opponents you'll likely win against. Why should it be? Because that behaviour creates a poor playing experience for those players.
MichelSableheart,
Een van de Veroveraars der Lage Landen
User avatar
Colonel MichelSableheart
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:10 pm
Medals: 21
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby Woodruff on Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:38 pm

Jippd wrote:
natty_dread wrote:Why should it be illegal to play games you know you'll likely win?

I still haven't heard a good answer to this question.


Another good question is who would join or create a game that they don't think they will win?


I would. I don't want an easy win, I want the fun of actual competition.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby chapcrap on Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:52 pm

Woodruff wrote:
Jippd wrote:
natty_dread wrote:Why should it be illegal to play games you know you'll likely win?

I still haven't heard a good answer to this question.


Another good question is who would join or create a game that they don't think they will win?


I would. I don't want an easy win, I want the fun of actual competition.

I would too. For medals or to learn new maps.
Image
User avatar
Major chapcrap
Tournament Director
Tournament Director
 
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City
Medals: 167
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (31)
General Achievement (16) Clan Achievement (16) Training Achievement (6) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (34)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby Jippd on Mon Feb 06, 2012 3:29 pm

chapcrap wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Jippd wrote:
natty_dread wrote:Why should it be illegal to play games you know you'll likely win?

I still haven't heard a good answer to this question.


Another good question is who would join or create a game that they don't think they will win?


I would. I don't want an easy win, I want the fun of actual competition.

I would too. For medals or to learn new maps.


My point is that every map I play (whether I know it or not), I go into the game planning on winning whether I will or not is a different question.
User avatar
Colonel Jippd
 
Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:05 pm
Medals: 102
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Bot Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (15)
General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (17) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (11)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby chapcrap on Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:16 pm

Jippd wrote:My point is that every map I play (whether I know it or not), I go into the game planning on winning whether I will or not is a different question.

Fair enough.
Image
User avatar
Major chapcrap
Tournament Director
Tournament Director
 
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City
Medals: 167
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (31)
General Achievement (16) Clan Achievement (16) Training Achievement (6) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (34)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby Woodruff on Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:42 pm

Jippd wrote:
chapcrap wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Jippd wrote:
natty_dread wrote:Why should it be illegal to play games you know you'll likely win?

I still haven't heard a good answer to this question.


Another good question is who would join or create a game that they don't think they will win?


I would. I don't want an easy win, I want the fun of actual competition.

I would too. For medals or to learn new maps.


My point is that every map I play (whether I know it or not), I go into the game planning on winning whether I will or not is a different question.


Well, of course. But that's really not the sort of thing that's the problem...that's just simple competitiveness. That's a far different thing from knowing you're getting an almost certain victory.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby natty dread on Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:49 pm

MichelSableheart wrote:Why should it be? Because that behaviour creates a poor playing experience for those players.


How do you know that? Why can't those players make up their own minds about that? Maybe they also like the challenge.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: fucked off
Medals: 49
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (12) Map Contribution (12) General Contribution (7)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby Woodruff on Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:37 pm

natty dread wrote:
MichelSableheart wrote:Why should it be? Because that behaviour creates a poor playing experience for those players.


How do you know that? Why can't those players make up their own minds about that? Maybe they also like the challenge.


We have a current situation where a very high-ranking player who has made a serious habit (19% of his games, I believe) of playing against ?s AND has joined games even at the explicit request of these players that he not join them. Of course, these players are so new that they don't know about or understand the function of the FOE list and how that could help them. At least one of these players (that I am personally aware of) has not returned to the site since this very high-ranking player joined his fourth or fifth game against him, which followed that request by one or two games. So the site is actually losing customers by supporting this sort of gameplay, but they don't seem to care.

Of course, when the multi-hunters are allowed to serially multi-ban newbies that they're playing against in games and nothing is done about it...well, what can you really expect, I suppose.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby MichelSableheart on Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:17 am

Natty_Dread wrote:How do you know that? Why can't those players make up their own minds about that? Maybe they also like the challenge.
If it didn't create a poor playing experience for those players, we wouldn't have a sergeant complaining in the C&A forum just a week ago, nor would we have player's requesting other players not to join their games. I don't have the time to do thorough research, but the complaints come up in the C&A forum when it's not against the rules and when only a small percentage of users uses the forums. That indicates that there is a problem.
MichelSableheart,
Een van de Veroveraars der Lage Landen
User avatar
Colonel MichelSableheart
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:10 pm
Medals: 21
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby chapcrap on Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:33 am

Woodruff wrote:At least one of these players (that I am personally aware of) has not returned to the site since this very high-ranking player joined his fourth or fifth game against him, which followed that request by one or two games. So the site is actually losing customers by supporting this sort of gameplay, but they don't seem to care.

If the site (which actually has no feelings of its own) doesn't care, then why did they just implement new rules to ban farmers from joining games against NRs? It seems like the site explicitly cared about this situation, because the new punishment takes into account this exact type of thing.
Image
User avatar
Major chapcrap
Tournament Director
Tournament Director
 
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City
Medals: 167
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (31)
General Achievement (16) Clan Achievement (16) Training Achievement (6) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (34)

Re: Redefinition of the farming rule

Postby Woodruff on Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:34 pm

chapcrap wrote:
Woodruff wrote:At least one of these players (that I am personally aware of) has not returned to the site since this very high-ranking player joined his fourth or fifth game against him, which followed that request by one or two games. So the site is actually losing customers by supporting this sort of gameplay, but they don't seem to care.


If the site (which actually has no feelings of its own) doesn't care, then why did they just implement new rules to ban farmers from joining games against NRs? It seems like the site explicitly cared about this situation, because the new punishment takes into account this exact type of thing.


Those rules have no actual teeth. There is no actual punishment for wrongdoing. It's akin to a bankrobber being caught and having the punishment be "you can no longer enter banks". Big flipping deal.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

PreviousNext

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Login