jefjef wrote: Symmetry wrote: jefjef wrote:
From the OPs posted suggestion:
there's a fair amount of consensus that the punishments are kind of light for premium players who cheat.
So was this sugg created out of disdain for premium players? Huh.
That's a fair criticism, and I hope that my position has been clearly altered from the OP that asked for discussion of the topic. I do think the punishments tend to be light for premium players, but then they've paid for a lighter punishment. This suggestion seems more like an equal punishment, if that makes sense.
Medals earned unfairly, regardless of premium or freemium, would be stripped equally from cheaters.
I don't recall anyone avoiding punishment due to being premium and even if their being premium was taken into consideration what would be wrong with that? A business should and needs to consider those who provide them profit.
As for this sugg it's obvious from your response that you are specifically targeting premium players. You could edit the qualifying "premium" out of your sugg...
Not really my policy- I consider the OP as the original post, asking for discussion and input. If I just wanted yes or no answers, I wouldn't have submitted it as a suggestion.
I kind of like that people can take the original suggestion, modify it, interpret it, change it, criticise it...
I won't edit my OP, as there's plenty of give and take based on it by other posters. Some stuff I've accepted, some rejected, some others have taken on board, or rejected in their own ways.
The discussion is as it stands, and I won't modify its history.