Rules Determination

Suggestions that have been inactive for a long period of time.

Moderators: Suggestions Team, Global Moderators

Re: Rules Determination

Postby jgordon1111 on Mon May 28, 2012 9:55 pm

Why does this never end,everyone wants everything in black and white. The rules are not black and white why pretend that they are enforced in a consistent manner.

Chap this is only my point of view here no one else's,you say anarchy because it was mentioned to throw the rules out.

But you bypassed the context of the post.


The rules are being enforced in an extreme biased way. Some are allowed to thumb their noses with no penalties,others are punished quickly for the same infractions.

That is the forerunner of the anarchy that you wish to avoid,when the governance of anything is biased, it is anarchy thinly disguised and mislabeled.

I am not going to spend the time to bring in the pages of favoritism,or the counter pages of those not being favored,If you think it is not happening you are in error.

Therefore I believe what is being asked by the OP,is that reform and change happen where the rules are enforced and enforced equally.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant jgordon1111
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm
Medals: 41
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (2)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby agentcom on Mon May 28, 2012 11:57 pm

deathcomesrippin wrote:- Secret Diplomacy is enforced when it can be proven. It's super tough to prove secret diplomacy, and it's a bit biased for a person in the game to actually look at whether it was secret diplomacy or just bad luck of being stuck in the wrong place between two players. As for foreign languages, I agree that all foreign language that each player cannot speak should be disallowed in a game regardless of the context of the conversation.



This is basically how it is. If you see another language being spoken, you can report it. The mods will look into it just as with any other SD claim. It could be that it's not actually SD (if the talk has nothing to do with the game), just like any other SD claim.

I've only run across this once, and all I had to do was politely ask for English only in chat and it didn't happen again. So, I agree with the foreign language rule as it is written and have never seen a C&A case on it, so I don't know if there's any problem with enforcement.
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3947
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 76
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (15) General Achievement (8)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby agentcom on Tue May 29, 2012 12:00 am

Jgordon,

I think the proposal could rightly, if simplistically, be described as anarchy. Of course, there will always be some rules, but this suggestion seriously tries to keep them to a bare minimum. Woodruff himself said as much.
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3947
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 76
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (15) General Achievement (8)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby deathcomesrippin on Tue May 29, 2012 5:58 am

I think Woodruff's suggestion was more to try to standardize the rules, with the throwing away of the rules as more of a tongue in cheek "if you dont change just get rid of them" line of thought.
User avatar
Captain deathcomesrippin
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 1312
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:26 am
Location: Canada
Medals: 55
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (10) General Contribution (7)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby jgordon1111 on Tue May 29, 2012 11:27 am

deathcomesrippin wrote:I think Woodruff's suggestion was more to try to standardize the rules, with the throwing away of the rules as more of a tongue in cheek "if you dont change just get rid of them" line of thought.


That is the way I took it. Not an actual call for anarchy.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant jgordon1111
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm
Medals: 41
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (2)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby deathcomesrippin on Tue May 29, 2012 12:05 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:I think Woodruff's suggestion was more to try to standardize the rules, with the throwing away of the rules as more of a tongue in cheek "if you dont change just get rid of them" line of thought.


That is the way I took it. Not an actual call for anarchy.


I hope not.
User avatar
Captain deathcomesrippin
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 1312
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:26 am
Location: Canada
Medals: 55
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (10) General Contribution (7)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby chapcrap on Tue May 29, 2012 12:11 pm

We'll know when we see his avatar change...

Image
Image
User avatar
Captain chapcrap
 
Posts: 9581
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City
Medals: 168
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (31)
General Achievement (16) Clan Achievement (17) Training Achievement (6) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (34)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby agentcom on Tue May 29, 2012 1:34 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:I think Woodruff's suggestion was more to try to standardize the rules, with the throwing away of the rules as more of a tongue in cheek "if you dont change just get rid of them" line of thought.


That is the way I took it. Not an actual call for anarchy.


That's what I thought, too. But his response was the one chap quoted. He said he does want to get rid of a lot of the rules.
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3947
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 76
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (15) General Achievement (8)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby TheGeneral2112 on Thu May 31, 2012 7:51 pm

I am thegeneral and I support this suggestion.
User avatar
Lieutenant TheGeneral2112
 
Posts: 371
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:50 pm
Medals: 17
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (1)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby Pedronicus on Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:03 am

Nice thread Woodster.
7 days from you posting such a great list of things for the admin to consider and so far, the amount of admin responses sum up why this site is going down the shitter.
Image
Highest position 7th. Highest points 3311 All of my graffiti can be found here
Major Pedronicus
 
Posts: 2079
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:42 pm
Location: Busy not shitting you....
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (6) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (13) Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby benga on Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:46 am

Woody made great remarks and he should be heard more.

There us so much inconsistency in applying the rules right now.

And I feel judgements so far were done based on subjective not objective reasons.
User avatar
Private 1st Class benga
 
Posts: 4497
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 pm
Medals: 173
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (31) General Achievement (16)
Clan Achievement (38) Challenge Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (31) General Contribution (1)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby Woodruff on Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:29 pm

agentcom wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:- Secret Diplomacy is enforced when it can be proven. It's super tough to prove secret diplomacy, and it's a bit biased for a person in the game to actually look at whether it was secret diplomacy or just bad luck of being stuck in the wrong place between two players. As for foreign languages, I agree that all foreign language that each player cannot speak should be disallowed in a game regardless of the context of the conversation.



This is basically how it is. If you see another language being spoken, you can report it. The mods will look into it just as with any other SD claim. It could be that it's not actually SD (if the talk has nothing to do with the game), just like any other SD claim.

I've only run across this once, and all I had to do was politely ask for English only in chat and it didn't happen again. So, I agree with the foreign language rule as it is written and have never seen a C&A case on it, so I don't know if there's any problem with enforcement.


Several exist. Some are ruled such that the use of a foreign language itself constitutes a violation. Some are ruled such that the use of a foreign language itself does not constitute a violation.

agentcom wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:I think Woodruff's suggestion was more to try to standardize the rules, with the throwing away of the rules as more of a tongue in cheek "if you dont change just get rid of them" line of thought.


That is the way I took it. Not an actual call for anarchy.


That's what I thought, too. But his response was the one chap quoted. He said he does want to get rid of a lot of the rules.


I'm VERY confused by your statement here. It appears that, similar to chapcrap, you read one line and didn't work to figure in the context involved never mind read my response to him.
Last edited by Woodruff on Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4973
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby Woodruff on Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:30 pm

deathcomesrippin wrote:I think Woodruff's suggestion was more to try to standardize the rules, with the throwing away of the rules as more of a tongue in cheek "if you dont change just get rid of them" line of thought.


You are essentially correct, though I would place it a tad above "tongue in cheek" and put it more at "exasperated desperation at something that would mimic standardization".
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4973
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby Woodruff on Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:32 pm

Pedronicus wrote:Nice thread Woodster.
7 days from you posting such a great list of things for the admin to consider and so far, the amount of admin responses sum up why this site is going down the shitter.


In truth, 7 days isn't necessarily that long of a time, as the two of them probably don't really inhabit the Suggestions area that much themselves, nor really need to. So I'm not disappointed...yet.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4973
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby deathcomesrippin on Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:52 pm

Woodruff wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:I think Woodruff's suggestion was more to try to standardize the rules, with the throwing away of the rules as more of a tongue in cheek "if you dont change just get rid of them" line of thought.


You are essentially correct, though I would place it a tad above "tongue in cheek" and put it more at "exasperated desperation at something that would mimic standardization".


I was being a bit cautious.
User avatar
Captain deathcomesrippin
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 1312
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:26 am
Location: Canada
Medals: 55
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (10) General Contribution (7)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby greenoaks on Sun Jun 03, 2012 1:01 am

i think CC should introduce a rule that all those wankers who refer to this as fora should be perma-banned.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class greenoaks
 
Posts: 9997
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am
Medals: 138
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (30) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (14)
Tournament Contribution (34) General Contribution (4)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby agentcom on Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:28 am

greenoaks wrote:i think CC should introduce a rule that all those wankers who refer to this as fora should be perma-banned.


It would be "refer to these as fora." I would refer to this as a forum.

Woodruff wrote:
agentcom wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:- Secret Diplomacy is enforced when it can be proven. It's super tough to prove secret diplomacy, and it's a bit biased for a person in the game to actually look at whether it was secret diplomacy or just bad luck of being stuck in the wrong place between two players. As for foreign languages, I agree that all foreign language that each player cannot speak should be disallowed in a game regardless of the context of the conversation.



This is basically how it is. If you see another language being spoken, you can report it. The mods will look into it just as with any other SD claim. It could be that it's not actually SD (if the talk has nothing to do with the game), just like any other SD claim.

I've only run across this once, and all I had to do was politely ask for English only in chat and it didn't happen again. So, I agree with the foreign language rule as it is written and have never seen a C&A case on it, so I don't know if there's any problem with enforcement.


Several exist. Some are ruled such that the use of a foreign language itself constitutes a violation. Some are ruled such that the use of a foreign language itself does not constitute a violation.


The one that I just saw ruled on didn't hold use of foreign language as a violation. They looked to see if there was any talk about the game. Not finding any, the players were cleared.

Woodruff wrote:
agentcom wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:I think Woodruff's suggestion was more to try to standardize the rules, with the throwing away of the rules as more of a tongue in cheek "if you dont change just get rid of them" line of thought.


That is the way I took it. Not an actual call for anarchy.


That's what I thought, too. But his response was the one chap quoted. He said he does want to get rid of a lot of the rules.


I'm VERY confused by your statement here. It appears that, similar to chapcrap, you read one line and didn't work to figure in the context involved never mind read my response to him.


I'm not sure what you're confused about. I'm thinking back to this:

Woodruff wrote:
agentcom wrote:I don't have time to go too deep on this now. One thing that might work against you is that your suggestion, in a way, is ONE suggestion: get rid of the rules (I know I'm simplifying). But in another way, it's several suggestions because it talks about amending all manner of forum rules. This will make it really hard to have discussions on where each rule should end up (assuming they're not completely done away with).


My actual suggestion is to get rid of the rules. However, I recognize that the powers that be are not likely to want to do so (for obvious reasons), and so I have also provided what I believe to be important points in making those rules relevant/more relevant if that is their decision. I didn't want to enact a suggestion for each one, as I felt that would result in an accusation of spamming/trolling against me (as has already been hinted at).
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3947
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 76
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (15) General Achievement (8)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby Woodruff on Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:44 pm

agentcom wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
agentcom wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:- Secret Diplomacy is enforced when it can be proven. It's super tough to prove secret diplomacy, and it's a bit biased for a person in the game to actually look at whether it was secret diplomacy or just bad luck of being stuck in the wrong place between two players. As for foreign languages, I agree that all foreign language that each player cannot speak should be disallowed in a game regardless of the context of the conversation.


This is basically how it is. If you see another language being spoken, you can report it. The mods will look into it just as with any other SD claim. It could be that it's not actually SD (if the talk has nothing to do with the game), just like any other SD claim.

I've only run across this once, and all I had to do was politely ask for English only in chat and it didn't happen again. So, I agree with the foreign language rule as it is written and have never seen a C&A case on it, so I don't know if there's any problem with enforcement.


Several exist. Some are ruled such that the use of a foreign language itself constitutes a violation. Some are ruled such that the use of a foreign language itself does not constitute a violation.


The one that I just saw ruled on didn't hold use of foreign language as a violation. They looked to see if there was any talk about the game. Not finding any, the players were cleared.


I couldn't find any in my search either, but I am absolutely certain it has happened in the past. At any rate, because my search skills seem to suck, I'm willing to concede that PERHAPS it never existed. <chuckle>

The problem, as I see it, is that someone seeing game chat in a foreign language can't know whether it is secret diplomacy or not, right? So they go to a web-translator to see if it is. But by doing so, they discover that the foreign language posted was indeed secret diplomacy AND YET because they are REQUIRED to make this check before it can be declared "secret diplomacy"...it fascinatingly no longer QUALIFIES as secret diplomacy, because it's not secret anymore (it was revealed via the web-translator)! Essentially, the "secret diplomacy via foreign language" rule is null and void as it is currently applied. If the use of a web-translator is required of a user to discover if a foreign chat is secret diplomacy or not, then the possibility of "secret diplomacy" cannot possibly happen. It is a useless rule and should therefore be eliminated.

agentcom wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
agentcom wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:I think Woodruff's suggestion was more to try to standardize the rules, with the throwing away of the rules as more of a tongue in cheek "if you dont change just get rid of them" line of thought.


That is the way I took it. Not an actual call for anarchy.


That's what I thought, too. But his response was the one chap quoted. He said he does want to get rid of a lot of the rules.


I'm VERY confused by your statement here. It appears that, similar to chapcrap, you read one line and didn't work to figure in the context involved never mind read my response to him.


I'm not sure what you're confused about. I'm thinking back to this:


In reading that entire statement (deleted to save space, but it's in the post directly above this one), it should become quite clear what the intent is. I'm sorry the context is creating a struggle for you. Not only that, but focusing on that aspect really completely takes away from the potential effectiveness of the suggestion itself.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4973
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby thegreekdog on Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:51 pm

I was not avoiding this thread purposefully, I just rarely come to suggestions.

I think Woodruff has an interesting take on solving potential problems (regarding consistency and rule violations). I do not agree with most of his premise, but I'm biased. I do think striving to be consistent is important, but I have an inherent and vehement dislike for hypocrisy.

I think better and clearer definitions for trolling and other forum violations would be helpful.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant thegreekdog
 
Posts: 6217
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia
Medals: 38
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (1)
Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (1)
General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (2) General Contribution (2)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby Woodruff on Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:54 pm

thegreekdog wrote:I was not avoiding this thread purposefully, I just rarely come to suggestions.


You and lackattack both.

thegreekdog wrote:I think Woodruff has an interesting take on solving potential problems (regarding consistency and rule violations). I do not agree with most of his premise, but I'm biased.


I'm ok with that. Could I get you to discuss the portions you disagree with?

thegreekdog wrote:I do think striving to be consistent is important, but I have an inherent and vehement dislike for hypocrisy.


Do you believe I'm being hypocritical with this suggestion?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4973
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby thegreekdog on Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:04 pm

I do not believe you are being hypocritical. I do believe you are being ironic (notwithstanding your use of the word "serious").

Here are the suggestions I agree with:

- Remove the rule regarding "unwritten" rules as regards gross abuse of the game. I think the rules should be set out in black and white. If something happens that looks like a gross abuse of the game, a rule should be written and applied prospectively (not retroactively).

- Remove the community guideline for trolling. I think trolling will fall appropriately under baiting. Trolling is too amorphous a concept to have as a rule.

Woodruff wrote:Could I get you to discuss the portions you disagree with?


Sure.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant thegreekdog
 
Posts: 6217
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia
Medals: 38
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (1)
Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (1)
General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (2) General Contribution (2)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby Woodruff on Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:12 pm

thegreekdog wrote:I do not believe you are being hypocritical.


Glad to hear it.

thegreekdog wrote:I do believe you are being ironic (notwithstanding your use of the word "serious").


I can't claim innocence of that, I must admit. But I am attempting to use some irony (and plenty of sarcasm) in a serious manner.

thegreekdog wrote:Here are the suggestions I agree with:
- Remove the rule regarding "unwritten" rules as regards gross abuse of the game. I think the rules should be set out in black and white. If something happens that looks like a gross abuse of the game, a rule should be written and applied prospectively (not retroactively).


I have no problem with this at all. It seems perfectly fair. I agree that it should not be applied retroactively. However, I'm not sure if something along the lines of "gross abuse" CAN necessarily be put into black-and-white terms. Some finesse seems necessary, to me.

thegreekdog wrote:- Remove the community guideline for trolling. I think trolling will fall appropriately under baiting. Trolling is too amorphous a concept to have as a rule.


I see little difference between trolling and baiting. Trolling is simply the widespread use of baiting (as I've always perceived it), so this is fine with me.

thegreekdog wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Could I get you to discuss the portions you disagree with?


Sure.


Well don't keep me in suspense! <laughing>
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4973
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby thegreekdog on Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:26 pm

(1) Someone being "intentionally annoying" is subjective. Some posters may find a user to be intentionally annoying, while others may not. There are two potential routes to deal with someone that some find intentionally annoying and some don't: (a) discpiline the person; (b) ask the people that are annoyed to ignore the person. Option (a) has some finality and consequences to it. Option (b) does not. That does not mean that we should not discipline someone who is being intentionally annoying to everyone or is being so intentionally annoying as to be disruptive. The subjectivity of someone being intentionally annoying combined with the banning system is a dangerous combination for both consistency and enjoyment of the website.

(2) Bigotry should not be subjective and there should be concrete rules on what is not acceptable. However, bigotry is subjective. Someone said this in another thread: an American may not find the word "Paki" to be objectionable. But it is to a whole lot of people. I also don't want to chill any speech on race, religion, etc. So, bigotry is going to be subjective.

(3) Flaming is also very subjective. I believe that flaming happens when someone is truly bothered by what someone else posts about them. For example, you might tell me to f*ck off. That doesn't bother me. If it truly bothers someone else, I think that's flaming. Total subjectivity.

I think that people complain about moderation because it's easy to complain about. Moderators have to balance two important things. On one side there is the enforcement of the rules to make the forum enjoyable to all. On the other side are the rules themselves. For example (and as I've argued before), if I were to make a very strict interpretation of trolling as being intentionally annoying and applied it with consistency to all users, we would have little participation in the forum because everyone would be on three months bans. I don't want this to happen because I love (yes love) the off topics forum. I like that saxitoxin posted a "hey everyone, how's it going" thread and then someone else posted a "good, how are you" thread. I like that we have political and religious discussions that convince no one of anything. I like that we have NSFW thread where people post pictures of overweight women and others get angry. That's entertaining to me and a whole host of others. If we start taking a hardline interpretation of trolling, those threads are gone. That entertainment is gone.

That's my interpretation of things and I am only speaking for myself, not all the other moderators. I'm sure they have their own, differing, interpretations.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant thegreekdog
 
Posts: 6217
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia
Medals: 38
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (1)
Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (1)
General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (2) General Contribution (2)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby Evil Semp on Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:39 pm

Woodruff wrote:The problem, as I see it, is that someone seeing game chat in a foreign language can't know whether it is secret diplomacy or not, right? So they go to a web-translator to see if it is. But by doing so, they discover that the foreign language posted was indeed secret diplomacy AND YET because they are REQUIRED to make this check before it can be declared "secret diplomacy"...it fascinatingly no longer QUALIFIES as secret diplomacy, because it's not secret anymore (it was revealed via the web-translator)! Essentially, the "secret diplomacy via foreign language" rule is null and void as it is currently applied. If the use of a web-translator is required of a user to discover if a foreign chat is secret diplomacy or not, then the possibility of "secret diplomacy" cannot possibly happen. It is a useless rule and should therefore be eliminated.


They aren't required to use a translator.

I might said to someone that if they had used a translator they would not have had to make a C&A report about secret diplomacy. I also think if someone is chatting in a language you don't understand you should state that in chat so that the other players realize that. If it wasn't diplomacy I will send a PM to the accused mentioning the rule about chat so they know in the future.

At the time it was written in the chat it was secret.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 7168
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:50 pm
Medals: 80
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (21) General Achievement (6)
Clan Achievement (2) General Contribution (12)

Re: Rules Determination

Postby jgordon1111 on Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:24 pm

could someone clarify in the bigotry portion what is meant by, using religion or not using religion,that one has always thrown me for a loop. Everytime I read that I chuckle. According to that rule every player or person who has posted here is in violation.

Would that be a perma ban for all forum users,beings it escalates each time you commit a violation.

If I am misunderstanding please just let me know,it wont be the first or last time.

Sorry for the interruption woodruff. second time I have asked about this one. back to important matters now.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant jgordon1111
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm
Medals: 41
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (2)

Next

Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Login