After finishing of a tournament every participant can rate how well was a tournament organized with 1 to 5 stars, same as we rate players.
- less then 2 stars: TO organized the tournament very poorly, so he will not get a medal for it and if he organize another consecutive tournament with less then 3 stars he should not organize tournaments in the next 3 months(time for learning how tournament should be organized)
- from 2 to 3 stars: TO organized the tournament poorly, so he will not get a medal for it.
- over 3 stars: TO organized the tournament properly, so he will get a medal for it.
- players that leave rating for the tournament could also receive a medal(similar medal as rating player) Edit: Added after initial proposal
How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
TO's that organize their tournaments properly will get well deserved medals and everyone can see if TO is good or bad Tournament Organizer so we can avoid bad TO's
The proposal is about quality control, nothing else. Less work for Tournament Directors(the general public will influence the quality of the tournaments), higher quality tournaments and ultimately better game experience.
Question for those that do not support this suggestion: How do you know if some TO makes quality tournaments, you bring that conclusion based on what?