Maximum Speed Games a Player to Create in Awaiting List

[lackattack]

Done! There is now a reasonable limit of 10 speed games at once to prevent point dumping and other nonsense

[lord voldemort]

thats nice...good round number i think

[ManBungalow]

Done! There is now a reasonable limit of 10 speed games at once to prevent point dumping and other nonsense

Does this game include active speed games, or just the awaiting games?

[lackattack]

Both

[HardAttack]

Maximum Allowed Speed Games a Player Can Create


Concise description:

• Speed games, in waiting list there are many maps in high variety of settings there are. There are moments (not very rare) a player creating a lot of/many speed games, say 8, 10 of them, which is quite annoying.
• There is no way a player can run 10 speed games at a time, to me it is maximum 2, or 3 games a player can run healthily... Exceptions may stay around, but rules are not set to cover exceptions.
• Many speed games a player creates, in those games missed turns, deadbeat situations, whatever unhealthy game play very well expectable, which is a bitter taste for opponents.
• One another negative aspect, when a player creates 8-10 games, it is taking a lot of time for other game makers games to get filled. Mostly due to game list is getting huge, and our single maybe two games are lost or tough to be seen in the mesh/mess.

Specifics/Details:

• For above stated reasons, i believe setting a maximum number for a player to create speed games will do a good job. How many ? I am not sure but to me 4 is quite good call.

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

• Well, i believe this is going to increase the efficiency of use of speed game environment.

Thanks in advance.

[chapcrap]

I don't think this suggestion is really feasible. Many people, myself included, can play 10 games at once, especially if the turns are 5 minute turns.

In addition, if people were unable to play the games they start, they'll either suffer themselves or they are point dumping and will get in trouble for that. No one should be limited by the site in how many games they play if they are paying to play.

[greenoaks]

10 speed games at once is not hard if they have 4 or more players.

[betiko]

NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1

[GeneralRisk]

It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......viewtopic.php?f=239&t=182833

[chapcrap]

NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1

It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 9&t=182833

So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...

Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.

[betiko]

NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1

It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......viewtopic.php?f=239&t=182833

So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...

Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.

Other than this it s highly annoying when your opponent is on 10 games at a time and makes you wait 4mins each turn to start just because he can.

[GeneralRisk]

NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1

It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......viewtopic.php?f=239&t=182833

So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...

Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.

Maybe u can play 20 games. Believe me that most players on this site cant play more than 5 at a time. Many of the idiots who try to play more than 5 games at a time have in the past joined my team in dubs games and miss fucking turns. This only serves to aggravate me and to have to foe yet again. As far as cryinglion and tank21, I guess the c and a team are just too busy or just plain lazy to have just dealt with it on their own.

[chapcrap]

NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1

It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 9&t=182833

So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...

Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.

Other than this it s highly annoying when your opponent is on 10 games at a time and makes you wait 4mins each turn to start just because he can.

Then don't join those games against them...

[GeneralRisk]

NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1

It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......viewtopic.php?f=239&t=182833

So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...

Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.

Other than this it s highly annoying when your opponent is on 10 games at a time and makes you wait 4mins each turn to start just because he can.

Then don't join those games against them...

Nobody on this site can properly play 20, 8 player esc speed games simultaneously, including you. Who the f*ck you think you talking too?

[chapcrap]

NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1

It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 9&t=182833

So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...

Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.

Other than this it s highly annoying when your opponent is on 10 games at a time and makes you wait 4mins each turn to start just because he can.

Then don't join those games against them...

Nobody on this site can properly play 20, 8 player esc speed games simultaneously, including you. Who the f*ck you think you talking too?

Yeah, maybe I wouldn't make the best decision in every game, but don't act like I can't do it. And if I want to, to have fun, then I should be able to.