qwert wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.
well for all medal could be abuse, but these we will not have any medals at all. Like i say in first post,these its open for discussion, unfortunately for some people there its not discussion at all. What its worse, after they say negative about these suggestion, they come over and over again in these post to put negative pressure to everyone who maybe think that these its good idea.
After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?
Why don't you respond to the abuse aspect?
Why do you think that this will not lead to abuse?
qwert wrote:Jippd wrote:Would it be decided based on when the games end or the game numbers themselves?
im not quite sure what you mean?
He is asking whether the consecutive victories go by the time the games finish or do they go by the game number.