Forum

by **NoSurvivors** on Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:48 pm

cooldeals wrote:I agree with the tag only being a temporary thing. This site is young and some kid making a multi when he is 14 probably shouldn't have the tag when he is 45.

This, I agree with.

by **rhp 1** on Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:50 pm

NoSurvivors wrote:
cooldeals wrote:I agree with the tag only being a temporary thing. This site is young and some kid making a multi when he is 14 probably shouldn't have the tag when he is 45.

This, I agree with.

+1

by **rishaed** on Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:39 pm

rhp 1 wrote:
NoSurvivors wrote:
cooldeals wrote:I agree with the tag only being a temporary thing. This site is young and some kid making a multi when he is 14 probably shouldn't have the tag when he is 45.

This, I agree with.

+1

+2

I also agree on the timetables. You make a choice, you have to live with the consequences. Maybe it'll help those considering making a multi turn it down. Why make a multi, for when you get busted to get on peoples foe lists until the marker disappears? Hmmm, more than happy to trust them again, but don't want it linked to premium, Just a timeframe. In other words of an example: Sex Offenders can't pay to get themselves off of the list of registered Sex Offenders, Why should multis be able to buy themselves off of the list here?

by **Evil Semp** on Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:39 pm

Swifte wrote:
chapcrap wrote:
Swifte wrote:Secret Dip

What do you put in your secret dip? Let's make it and watch the Super Bowl!

It's got real bits of multis in it, adds a little zestiness. Go 9ers.

http://youtu.be/59YguFR9iAA

by **chapcrap** on Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:50 am

Something similar that I found: viewtopic.php?f=471&t=17860

by **agentcom** on Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:47 pm

I don't think this is going to happen. CC punishments occur in C&A through other means and calls to brand folks with "scarlet letters" have been repeatedly rejected (although, they are now in the "archived" section do to forum reorganization). For example, see the "scarlet letter" section regarding farmers, here.

I'm generally against all of these things. Punishments happen and people are given a chance to change their ways without being branded (permanently or temporarily) for their actions. If they keep violating the rules, the punishments get increasingly severe until they are booted from the site.

by **codierose** on Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:28 pm

correct me if im wrong but are they not already branded as guests or guested under there groups. Not sure but thought i saw it somewhere ??

by **chapcrap** on Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:00 pm

codierose wrote:correct me if im wrong but are they not already branded as guests or guested under there groups. Not sure but thought i saw it somewhere ??

That is true if they don't buy back.

by **codierose** on Fri Feb 01, 2013 10:16 pm

chapcrap wrote:
codierose wrote:correct me if im wrong but are they not already branded as guests or guested under there groups. Not sure but thought i saw it somewhere ??

That is true if they don't buy back.

ok so way brand them twice ?
How many times can you buy back after being busted ?

by **greenoaks** on Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:22 am

codierose wrote:
chapcrap wrote:
codierose wrote:correct me if im wrong but are they not already branded as guests or guested under there groups. Not sure but thought i saw it somewhere ??

That is true if they don't buy back.

ok so way brand them twice ?
How many times can you buy back after being busted ?

once

by **codierose** on Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:29 am

greenoaks wrote:
codierose wrote:
chapcrap wrote:
codierose wrote:correct me if im wrong but are they not already branded as guests or guested under there groups. Not sure but thought i saw it somewhere ??

That is true if they don't buy back.

ok so way brand them twice ?
How many times can you buy back after being busted ?

once

ok so why do we want to brand/tag multis twice
why not just change the group from guest to busted to make it clearer what they did

by **patrickaa317** on Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:11 pm

Anyone busted cheating should have a big old asterisk placed next to their avatar. Perhaps with different colors signifying how many times or how badly they offended.

I support this over any type of medal stripping or point resetting. Give them a reminder and make sure the public easily can tell who they are.

by **nicestash** on Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:47 pm

As a said in the other thread, I support this but think the asterisks should go away after a time (I'm not sure how long).

by **BigBallinStalin** on Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:54 pm

Sounds good. Cheaters need to be shamed repeatedly for their crimes against ConquerClubity.

Shall we set the time limit for the asterik at 6 months?

by **betiko** on Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:23 pm

i agree with that and with the fact that it should be limited in time, 6 month sounds good ("noted" shouldn't be counted, and "warning" i'm not sure) nevertheless, if we count only real offense, there should be no such thing as the double asterisk, the player should be banned on second major offense.

oh, and this should not include anything related to forum missbehaviour, just game related.