Conquer Club

gameplayer wrote:

chipv wrote:

lancehoch wrote:Would it be possible to set up the max score to not take into account past high scores? By that I mean, if/when it is added, the then current score is set as the high (if above 1000, else 1000 is set as the high) and this is only changed if the score goes above this high score.

Yes. This could also be done starting from any time after Feb as that was when the logs went missing.
I could actually add this this to Map Rank if I included a relative score feature.
i.e. if you change the chart timescale then the first point starts at 1000 and calculation starts there.
For any time after the logs went missing, this would then have no errors but of course ignores any previous high score.

So of course possible from the site too, but again it would ignore previous high scores.

so basically this^^^ is the only possible way for it to happen, because of the missing game logs? I still think that would be better than nothing. You could just add a little note: High Score(after February 2008) xxxx

Ok. It's a pity because were it not for Terminator games, a full rescore would be able to recover all of the missing points.

I searched for this and couldn't find it, so here goes...

Concise description:

• In a players profile, could there be something to indicate the highest score and rank ever achieved?

Specifics:

• So, in addition to current rank, score, attendence etc. Just underneath that lot. Just a nice additional feature.

Rocket

Agree with this.

Use the Map Rak plug-in until something like this happens. If you pull up the chart, it gives you highest and lowest scores. Although if you try to do that on a player with several thousand games, it will freeze and you'll have to restart firefox.

I also would like to see that.

Rocketry wrote:I searched for this and couldn't find it, so here goes...

Concise description:

• In a players profile, could there be something to indicate the highest score and rank ever achieved?

Specifics:

• So, in addition to current rank, score, attendence etc. Just underneath that lot. Just a nice additional feature.

Rocket

I agree my highest rank was 4 small points from lieutenant but when I had a little/major drop I would have liked to remind people I was not just some private...

i think this would be an awesome idea... hope to see it in the future

great idea......how should cheaters be handled? Meaning, should their high score and rank be deleted once busted? How about players that were warned?

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:great idea......how should cheaters be handled? Meaning, should their high score and rank be deleted once busted? How about players that were warned?

If a player has their score reset then I guess they would lose their highest rank indicator as well...

Rocket.

Just my 2-cents.. (not sure if it has been brought up before, but a quick search did not yield much. tho i admit i only scanned thru my searches)

Thought it would be a useful information to include under user statistics, the highest score attained for the player.

For me, it is just for record so that i know how well i had achieved over the time i've played here. It could also give me an indication of how good a player is.

Thanks.

1.Install Greasemonkey.
2.Install the add-ons ConquerStats Score Charts and Map Rank.
3.Check your Map Rank and look at your missing logs. Total the points gained/lost from games in your missing logs.
4.Go to your profile and let ConquerStats load. It will display the highest score you've achieved in the top of the y-axis (of the graph). However, this score excludes the points gained/lost from missing logs.
5.Do the math.

I dont know its these all ready been sugested,but its will be good that in user statistic,add highest and lowest place on scoreboard.Also add present scoreboard place.
here graphic example

Hm, interesting, It would be more accurate, as people won't always know their highest spot on the scoreboard since it is changing,

Wait...so, each players score on the scoreboard would be their highest plus their lowest? Hmmm..
That would technically be more accurate I suppose, but at the same time, you get points by winning games, and that raises your place on the scoreboard. Conversely, losing brings you down. If I'm understanding it right, I don't think I'd be in favor. Not for any particular reason, merely just an 'It it isn't broken, don't fix it' opinion.

I think you misread what he meant. From what i can tell, qwert wants, on your profile, you're highest known score/rank/placing to be shown, and your lowest score/rank/placing.

Oh, I was thinking that our position on the scoreboard would be an average of the two. Neverminddd

by TheForgivenOne on Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:35 am

I think you misread what he meant. From what i can tell, qwert wants, on your profile, you're highest known score/rank/placing to be shown, and your lowest score/rank/placing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
yes these is what i meant-maybe its also to add present scoreboard place in user profile also

highest score is relevant if you know what the highest at that time was ....
and how many were in front of you
and how many were behind you
and how close you were to those in front of you
and how close those behind you were to you



the highest score is pointless unless the scoreboard at that time is accessable

greenoaks wrote:highest score is relevant if you know what the highest at that time was ....
and how many were in front of you
and how many were behind you
and how close you were to those in front of you
and how close those behind you were to you



the highest score is pointless unless the scoreboard at that time is accessable

Which is why it also has your rank next to it. Highest Score 4300 Rank 11 or whatever

highest score is relevant if you know what the highest at that time was ....
and how many were in front of you
and how many were behind you
and how close you were to those in front of you
and how close those behind you were to you
the highest score is pointless unless the scoreboard at that time is accessable
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont understand quite what you mean-statistic its statistic,who present player point and place ,i dont understand why its these pointless?

lowest score is irrelevant.

This is a good idea, especially the lowest score - I'm sick of being misled by a user's score, rank, and games won: those three factors fluctuate incredibly, and does no justice to reflect their actual game play. A mini-record tool such as this would be quite useful to dispose of that issue.

So an example of this, possibly below the score, or under everything.


Username:TheForgivenOne
Current Rank: Sergeant 1st Class
Current Score:1587
Highest Rank and score: Major - 2144 - 791st 06/23/10
Lowest Rank: Cadet - 823 16562nd 09/17/09
Games:1702 completed, 555 (33%) won | Find all games with TheForgivenOne
Attendance:100% of turns taken
Rating: 4.7 | View TheForgivenOne's ratings
Location: Wetaskiwin Alberta Canada
Country: Canada
Age: 18

jaimito101 wrote:lowest score is irrelevant.

but you can extend that logic to say highest score, too, is irrelevant.

TheForgivenOne wrote:So an example of this, possibly below the score, or under everything.


Username:TheForgivenOne
Current Rank: Sergeant 1st Class
Current Score:1587
Highest Rank and score: Major - 2144 - 791st 06/23/10
Lowest Rank: Cadet - 823 16562nd 09/17/09
Games:1702 completed, 555 (33%) won | Find all games with TheForgivenOne
Attendance:100% of turns taken
Rating: 4.7 | View TheForgivenOne's ratings
Location: Wetaskiwin Alberta Canada
Country: Canada
Age: 18

It certainly looks good. As I stated, I believe it's information as relevant as the current listed stats.

I do suppose you Could argue that the lowest rank feature won't be too surprising... the "highest" low score possible would be your default 1000 points.