mrswdk wrote:About 38%.
If an east-asian says so, it must be true. Everybody knows they're the best at math.
Moderator: Community Team
mrswdk wrote:About 38%.
owenshooter wrote:Dukasaur wrote:it may be a while before it's tried again, but if it is, the core of old-timers that stopped it last time won't be there to stop it again.
I think that, although the surrender button has been defeated many times in the past, people should not give up. It is a logical idea that will eventually win.
i really hope you just stop and think how shitty this statement is on your part... not only shitty, but embarrassing... you would make an awesome politician...-Jésus noir
Dukasaur wrote:owenshooter wrote:Dukasaur wrote:it may be a while before it's tried again, but if it is, the core of old-timers that stopped it last time won't be there to stop it again.
I think that, although the surrender button has been defeated many times in the past, people should not give up. It is a logical idea that will eventually win.
i really hope you just stop and think how shitty this statement is on your part... not only shitty, but embarrassing... you would make an awesome politician...-Jésus noir
Nothing shitty about it. I see it at work all the time. There's some necessary improvements that need to be made, but some higher-up with obsolete ideas entrenched in his mind says, "nope, can't be done." Amazing, once the fuddy-duddy gets trundled off to the old folks' home, how quickly the impossible becomes possible, and the necessary improvements are made.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Serbia wrote:Dukasaur wrote:owenshooter wrote:Dukasaur wrote:it may be a while before it's tried again, but if it is, the core of old-timers that stopped it last time won't be there to stop it again.
I think that, although the surrender button has been defeated many times in the past, people should not give up. It is a logical idea that will eventually win.
i really hope you just stop and think how shitty this statement is on your part... not only shitty, but embarrassing... you would make an awesome politician...-Jésus noir
Nothing shitty about it. I see it at work all the time. There's some necessary improvements that need to be made, but some higher-up with obsolete ideas entrenched in his mind says, "nope, can't be done." Amazing, once the fuddy-duddy gets trundled off to the old folks' home, how quickly the impossible becomes possible, and the necessary improvements are made.
Continue ignoring the fact that it was already tried, and found to be a problem. Not all things desired by some qualify as "necessary".
Bollocks.
Serbia wrote:Continue ignoring the fact that it was already tried, and found to be a problem.
Serbia wrote: Not all things desired by some qualify as "necessary".
Donelladan wrote:Best way to do it would be to implement a resign button with as few restriction as possible, and then see how that works, and if necessary, add restrictions.
Donelladan wrote::shock:
There is no need to have a common agreement of what the resign button should be. Obviously there is so many possibilities to define the restrictions that we will never find something for which everyone agrees.
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
Shannon Apple wrote:the same ol' argument
JamesKer1 wrote:Donelladan wrote::shock:
There is no need to have a common agreement of what the resign button should be. Obviously there is so many possibilities to define the restrictions that we will never find something for which everyone agrees.
We actually DO need to have a fairly common agreement. Because the feature has been removed from the site at the request of the community, we need a large amount of widespread community support in bringing it back.
Metsfanmax wrote:[ At the end of the day, bigWham isn't really implementing things based on community support, except insofar as implementing something won't cause a riot. And the difference between whether the resign button occurs in trench games or not (say) is not a difference that riots will turn on.
owenshooter wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:[ At the end of the day, bigWham isn't really implementing things based on community support, except insofar as implementing something won't cause a riot. And the difference between whether the resign button occurs in trench games or not (say) is not a difference that riots will turn on.
yeah... kind of like the changes to freestyle... the powers that be didn't think that would cause much commotion... remember that? what did that do? about a 1/4 of the site vanished overnight... go ahead and put in a resign button and watch people quit when the cheating/abuse occurs like it did the first time... i love how the lunatic jr. mint mentality is finally manning this ship and all the ideas that the old guard shot down, are being put in place and continue to make the site crumble about our ears...-Jn
enjoycocacola wrote:Yes!
clangfield wrote:If it were a request to a mod rather than a button, would that suffice? They could check for multis before implementing. If it were premium only that would guard partially against users creating multiple free accounts and resigning in those games; if it were only active after, say, 40 rounds, then it would obviate the set-up & resign abuse.
Or, if everyone were to GROW UP AND BEHAVE LIKE DECENT HUMAN BEINGS, we wouldn't have to worry about people abusing the system, would we?
concrete wrote:enjoycocacola wrote:Yes!
alright........
yes.................32
no..................8
Users browsing this forum: No registered users