Moderator: Community Team
And finally, I know I may get some backlash for this one, but the removal of maps from the site that don't get played often. Everybody groans when Crossword comes up as the random map for a quads game, and not many people play it by choice. With so many new and exciting maps coming out, I think it's worth removing some of the older ones, or perhaps cycling through. You could then bring back older maps for events and the like.
denominator wrote:I haven't hung out around the Suggestions forum much recently, but I do try to keep an ear open to the "maybes" of CC.
I have always been a fan of Adjacent Attacks, and while we can play it as the rules are currently written, mistakes are inevitably made (generally by account sitters) which does vastly affect the game, even though we do our best to repair the game. I think far more players would appreciate the tactics involved in AA if they were given the chance, than the small group we currently have playing.
denominator wrote:Zombie/Infected Neutrals has been kicking around for a long time as well, and I'd also support that one. Unfortunately we don't have any way to try playing it under the current rules, but it would again be a drastic change to gameplay
denominator wrote:(for people that say nuclear spoils was a drastic change - it wasn't, it's basically no spoils with a huge element of luck).
denominator wrote:Increasing the XML database available for map makers sounds like a good idea to me, although I am not knowledgeable in the area. Anything that creates cooler maps would definitely be a plus to me.
denominator wrote:And finally, I know I may get some backlash for this one, but the removal of maps from the site that don't get played often. Everybody groans when Crossword comes up as the random map for a quads game, and not many people play it by choice. With so many new and exciting maps coming out, I think it's worth removing some of the older ones, or perhaps cycling through. You could then bring back older maps for events and the like.
denominator wrote:As for non-gameplay related, I remember reading long ago (this may not be relevant anymore) that there was talk of a proxy login for sitters. Players could turn this proxy on and off for when they are on vacation, enabling who can access their games via the sitter's account. This would eliminate all account abuse as there would never be a reason to give out your password, and it would be far easier to track if teams/clans are abusing team games. You could further limit it to proxies only accessing games, not the forums, so that moderators would not have to worry about non-moderators covering their turns.
- Which Suggestions should be implemented first?
- Which add-ons should be built into the site?
- If you were to make an ordered top 10 list of Submitted Suggestions to be Implemented, what would it be?
- What are some outstanding problems that you see with the Suggestions process?
- Are there any improvements you'd like to see?
- Which should have more priority:
- Suggestions that affect gameplay or
- Suggestions that improve site maintenance, hardware, processes, forum, etc (i.e. Usergroup Control Panel, https login)
Catarah wrote:oh i would love to finaly have Adjacent Attacks implented!
rdsrds2120 wrote:Wow! I never actually knew there was so much support for adjacent attacks! Thanks for your thoughts, I will be closing this Sunday, so if you have any more things to add, do so quickly!
jakewilliams wrote:Oliver has also said in the past that he's willing to pay for the AA implementation
I'm willing to help psuedo-code as well
Users browsing this forum: No registered users