Forum

by **betiko** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:34 pm

so basically when we (the pack) faced OTP in CL and won 7-5 we lost points and they went up? not sure it's totally fair either.

by **IcePack** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:45 pm

betiko wrote:so basically when we (the pack) faced OTP in CL and won 7-5 we lost points and they went up? not sure it's totally fair either.

By definition you "should" have won by a larger margin. The point gain / loss is minimal.
The way the actual 400 works if the number 1 clan played the bottom clan they'd auto lose points, FD adjusted it so this wasn't the case and is minimized quite a bit.

If clan played Fallen for example, you would be "expected" to win by a good margin.
If the last place clan played first and the war ends 21-20 in favor of #1 - you don't think it's fair to say that last place performed well and achieved "above" their score and vice versa?

These are things it considers. But for cases like PACK/OTP the effect is minimal (it was CL result which is already toned down) and the score was close, so again minimized.

IcePack

by **IcePack** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:48 pm

Gunn217 wrote:The impact of those miniwars will be so miniscule that going back and keeping up with the date of each completed war will be more work than it's worth. At least when I was doing it.

It is fairly minimal, but it does alter quite a few results minimally which ultimately could adjust a few positions. Since I got the time il just research and readjust finished dates to reflect the best / most accurate possible score the F400 can come up with.

IcePack

by **Keefie** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:53 pm

By way of an example Ice could you show the impact of the recent CC3 war between HH and IA. We were ranked 20 something and IA 6th and the result was 23-18 to IA. So in my book HH performed better than the ranking would suggest.

by **IcePack** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:56 pm

Keefie wrote:By way of an example Ice could you show the impact of the recent CC3 war between HH and IA. We were ranked 20 something and IA 6th and the result was 23-18 to IA. So in my book HH performed better than the ranking would suggest.

Sure I can do that. While I have plenty of time to help people analyze the system recreating each war / scenario is fun and all...but let's try not going crazy

lol

To make it easier on me if you could provide me the date that specific war your requesting took place I'd appreciate it.

IcePack

by **Keefie** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:03 pm

Forget that, it will be in next months update as it finished on 01/07

by **IcePack** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:16 pm

Ok 10-4

by **IcePack** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:24 pm

Is there any desire within the clan community to see this ranking become more of a "real time" ranking and less of a monthly ranking? While it couldn't be daily, I could update it more often than monthly if there was some desire to change.

"real time"
Weekly
Bi weekly
Monthly?
Etc

The idea can be batted around for a bit, just mentioning / testing the water.

IcePack

by **BGtheBrain** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:30 pm

IcePack wrote:Is there any desire within the clan community to see this ranking become more of a "real time" ranking and less of a monthly ranking? While it couldn't be daily, I could update it more often than monthly if there was some desire to change.

"real time"
Weekly
Bi weekly
Monthly?
Etc

The idea can be batted around for a bit, just mentioning / testing the water.

IcePack

Weekly would be awesome...

by **swimmerdude99** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:07 pm

Weekly would be great!!!

by **Sniper08** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:19 pm

no need to burn yourself out , 2 weeks would be great but im equally fine every month.

by **IcePack** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:20 pm

I'm not sure where the feelings of burn out are coming from, but this is something I enjoy doing. Not going to cause any burn out here.

IcePack

by **Sniper08** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:30 pm

IcePack wrote:I'm not sure where the feelings of burn out are coming from, but this is something I enjoy doing. Not going to cause any burn out here.

IcePack

im thinking long term , so far FD and gunn have given the rankings up after a few months of updating it ,if that trend continues you'll be giving it up after a while so instead of you doing it every week keep the status quo. if you commit to doing it every week and lets say you miss it a few times or something goes wrong or ppl start to criticize how your running it then enthusiasm drops and it becomes more of a pain to do it rather than a pleasure. you may enjoy doing this sort of stuff but when ppl get on your back about it you'll find it less enjoyable

by **IcePack** on Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:38 pm

Point taken. But I doubt I'll burn out, I enjoy it and even of people only wanted it monthly I'd probably still do it weekly for my own enjoyment. I just wouldn't go thru the trouble of posting it

Ultimately I am doing it for my enjoyment, posting it ere for others is a secondary benefit. I'll love feedback and corrections, but complainers will always be there. I understand that.

I get a lot (most) of my enjoyment from clan and tournaments, and clans really spark my interest. If I could do more within the clan area I probably would.

Anyway...

don't worry about my burn out.

IcePack