Conquer Club

MudPuppy wrote:

Genoke wrote:

IcePack wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:

Leehar wrote:

Genoke wrote:If a clan has N/A behind its name, under category "best showing in 1 year", does that mean the clan couldn't win a clan war during the whole that have passed?

It just means in the last year they haven't played enough wars to get a ranking because the weighting is too low.

No that means that they have not beat anybody in the last year in a war.

Bruceswar is correct. N/A means no win in last 12 months

ok, thanks for explanation guys... to bad there are so many N/A's...
8/42, almost 20% didn't win a clan war in the passed 1 year ...

That doesn't look right. What about Risk Attackers, for instance? They haven't won a full war but have won a bunch of mini wars and seem to have enough activity (123-138 overall) to warrant some kind of 'showing' for their efforts? Does the #27 clan get no credit for their 15-15 tie against the #13 clan for "Best Showing in 1 Year" purposes?

RA DB 10 2 07/06/12
RA MM 6 6 07/06/12
RA z-IGNI 7 5 07/06/12
RA LOTZ 6 6 07/06/12
RA MB 10 2 07/06/12
SOH RA 9 3 07/06/12
PACK RA 34 7 07/14/12
SOH RA 10 8 08/08/12
z-IGNI RA 9 9 08/15/12
MM RA 9 9 08/31/12
PIG RA 15 15 03/29/13
FALL RA 12 4 05/08/13
RA AOK 10 6 05/18/13
LOW RA 10 6 05/31/13
RA VDLL 13 3 06/01/13

IcePack wrote:I believe best showing doesn't take into consideration mini wars, ACC, etc. below 41 game "regular" wars. (while it does for the score, not for the "best in 12 month" column)

MudPuppy wrote:

IcePack wrote:I believe best showing doesn't take into consideration mini wars, ACC, etc. below 41 game "regular" wars. (while it does for the score, not for the "best in 12 month" column)

Gotcha... Thanks, Ice. Should it? Can it? Not trying to make more work for you if it's a pain... just posing the question.

IcePack wrote:

MudPuppy wrote:

IcePack wrote:I believe best showing doesn't take into consideration mini wars, ACC, etc. below 41 game "regular" wars. (while it does for the score, not for the "best in 12 month" column)

Gotcha... Thanks, Ice. Should it? Can it? Not trying to make more work for you if it's a pain... just posing the question.

Well, I think its trying to show best showing of something of substance. Not saying CL5 or mini matches dont matter (obviously they do, they're included in the scores) but i would say going 7-5 in Random League vs TOFU shouldn't be posted over, say, a regular war that you won in something else. Just because the smaller sets are a little easier to see "weird" anomalies data wise, and not as representative as a full 41 min war.

Can it? Yes...manually. Should it? I prefer not to, not just because of the additional work involved, but mainly for what I mentioned earlier. It helps give a representative sample of who they are fighting and best win to date is over the past year. While some clans might be active in leagues etc like RA, them not winning a complete war DOES tell viewers something about the activity level / chosen style of play.

And the 15-15 tie that you mentioned wouldn't be included even if i did...its a tie, not a win.

IcePack

Swifte wrote:I'm in favor of keeping results of less than 41 games off the 'top performance' column.

IcePack wrote:

Swifte wrote:I'm in favor of keeping results of less than 41 games off the 'top performance' column.

I don't plan to change this portion anytime soon, so no worries.

IcePack wrote:I believe best showing doesn't take into consideration mini wars, ACC, etc. below 41 game "regular" wars. (while it does for the score, not for the "best in 12 month" column)
Well, I think its trying to show best showing of something of substance. Not saying CL5 or mini matches dont matter (obviously they do, they're included in the scores) but i would say going 7-5 in Random League vs TOFU shouldn't be posted over, say, a regular war that you won in something else. Just because the smaller sets are a little easier to see "weird" anomalies data wise, and not as representative as a full 41 min war.

Swifte wrote:I'm in favor of keeping results of less than 41 games off the 'top performance' column.

hotfire wrote:

Swifte wrote:I'm in favor of keeping results of less than 41 games off the 'top performance' column.

im in favor of keeping resultsof less than 41 games off the ranking all together...or atleast being able to access that ranking system

hotfire wrote:

Swifte wrote:I'm in favor of keeping results of less than 41 games off the 'top performance' column.

im in favor of keeping resultsof less than 41 games off the ranking all together...or atleast being able to access that ranking system

benga wrote:WAR-RET 7-5 2013-06-04 included

RET-DYN 7-5 2013-06-09 incl

SOH-WAR 2-10 2013-06-13 incl

TFFS-TOFU 6-6 2013-06-04 incl

FOED-TNC 8-4 2013-06-10 incl

DYN-SOH 2-10 2013-06-08 incl

G1-PIG 5-7 2013-06-05 corrected f400

ID-OSA 5-7 2013-06-29 late add

LOW-MD 7-5 2013-06-11 incl

MB-FALL 2-11 2013-06-09 correct score 3-9 incl

TNC-HH 9-3 2013-06-10 incl

TOFU-FOED 8-4 2013-06-15 incl

WAR-TFFS 7-5 2013-06-15 late add

MD-MB 11-1 2013-06-17 late add

OSA-LOW 3-9 2013-06-22 late add

PIG-ID 5-7 2013-06-23 late add

TFFS-DYN 7-5 2013-06-27 late add

FOED-WAR 7-5 2013-06-29 late add

HH-TOFU 5-7 2013-06-30 late add

TNC-FALL 6-6 2013-06-30 late add

LOW-PIG 6-6 2013-07-01 add

WAR-HH 7-5 2013-07-05 add

Janomike wrote:Well here is RAs first full war victory then:

RA-DB 29-12 2013-07-10

Lets see how it improves our ranking.
And thanx Icepack for you efforts with this ranking

IcePack wrote:This one is getting released from the dispatch.

Bad news: i know the war thing isn't updated. The next occassion im on the correct computer, i promise to update it.
sorry my schedule is a bit crazy this week / weekend. maybe midway next week to the end of next week it will normalize but im hoping i can get that stuff out before then.

Good news: i hope that the next update, or the one after i will have a new interesting something er other to post

IcePack wrote:This one is getting released from the dispatch.

Bad news: i know the war thing isn't updated. The next occassion im on the correct computer, i promise to update it.
sorry my schedule is a bit crazy this week / weekend. maybe midway next week to the end of next week it will normalize but im hoping i can get that stuff out before then.

Good news: i hope that the next update, or the one after i will have a new interesting something er other to post

Genoke wrote:

IcePack wrote:This one is getting released from the dispatch.

Bad news: i know the war thing isn't updated. The next occassion im on the correct computer, i promise to update it.
sorry my schedule is a bit crazy this week / weekend. maybe midway next week to the end of next week it will normalize but im hoping i can get that stuff out before then.

Good news: i hope that the next update, or the one after i will have a new interesting something er other to post

Don't worry mate, take your time.
I know people are eager to know the next update (including me ), but most of us thanks CC for having one like you on the site.

ps: don't take to much on your fork so we're not going to loose you due a break of 3 years by exhausting mind!

Chariot of Fire wrote:I hope you're being awarded a medal for all this work you do. It's a great contribution to the clan scene, for which we're all very grateful.