C.C. THOTA vs. Nemesis [21-20] THOTA Prevails! [FINAL]

[cpurcell]

There was intended irony

That all gets lost by using this form of communication.

---C

[Blitzaholic]

Hey Blitz, congrats on getting the red dot back!!

thx

So, assuming a tie breaker is needed, is ONE classic trips REALLY enough to determine the winner of this epic??

one game doesn't seem to do much justice, I agree with you OlJock99.

[OlJock99]

one game doesn't seem to do much justice, I agree with you OlJock99.

Here is MY suggestion (haven't discussed with Nemesis, so for what it is worth...)

Best of 3 trips. Maps selected by impartial panel (maybe Chuuuuck, Lindax, & hiddendragon as all are out of the tourney). Settings selected by the panel (I vote chained, fog and no spoils! ). No repeated players (e.g. 9 from THOTA and 9 from Nemesis).

Thoughts??

[cpurcell]

one game doesn't seem to do much justice, I agree with you OlJock99.

Here is MY suggestion (haven't discussed with Nemesis, so for what it is worth...)

Best of 3 trips. Maps selected by impartial panel (maybe Chuuuuck, Lindax, & hiddendragon as all are out of the tourney). Settings selected by the panel (I vote chained, fog and no spoils! ). No repeated players (e.g. 9 from THOTA and 9 from Nemesis).

Thoughts??

I must say that that sounds very fair, unless of course one clan isn't strong at trips... Anywho, can't wait to see what others have to say.

---C

[OlJock99]

I must say that that sounds very fair, unless of course one clan isn't strong at trips... Anywho, can't wait to see what others have to say.

---C

Looks like trips were 8-6 in favor of THOTA and quads being 7-5 in favor of THOTA. Pretty even in my book.

[cpurcell]

I must say that that sounds very fair, unless of course one clan isn't strong at trips... Anywho, can't wait to see what others have to say.

---C

Looks like trips were 8-6 in favor of THOTA and quads being 7-5 in favor of THOTA. Pretty even in my book.

Then what the hell did we win?!?!

---C

[Big Whiskey]

How about we just extend the challenge 20 games?

[trapyoung]

maybe, but im still going to assume you dont understand serbian. and that last question is showing it.
but im not going to play grammar police here. your first statement, made without trying to find out is english my native language, showing your ignorance. so i really dont need to put any effort in showing your stupidity, you can do that without any help.

Well my original post was light-hearted, but you've decided to act a little bit like a douche about the whole thing. Here's some help if the term douche is lost in translation, http://theneave.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/DoucheBagmotivator.jpg.

You say you're not going to play grammar police, but is that only because you're so busy acting as fun police? Sorry to poke some fun towards you. I'll go retreat to my lonely corner of CC and rue the moment I pointed out a spelling mistake.

As for showing my ignorance, you're absolutely right. I should have pm'd you in private to figure out if you were foreign or just stupid. Thankfully you've taken a joke far too personally and demonstrated to everyone you are both. As for showing my stupidity, I must be grade-A, Serbian retarded because I haven't seen it yet. So run along little boy, thanks for playing. Next time watch your step before you stumble into some clap trap.

Sranje!

[OlJock99]

[cpurcell]

I concur!

---C

[freakns]

Well my original post was light-hearted

wow, you are such a nice guy... and witty!

You say you're not going to play grammar police, but is that only because you're so busy acting as fun police?

thats right. and you have been busted...

Sorry to poke some fun towards you. I'll go retreat to my lonely corner of CC and rue the moment I pointed out a spelling mistake.

so, chasing someones grammar mistakes is... funny? ok then, lol. im laughing at your incredible humour.

I should have pm'd you in private to figure out if you were foreign or just stupid. Thankfully you've taken a joke far too personally and demonstrated to everyone you are both. As for showing my stupidity, I must be grade-A, Serbian retarded because I haven't seen it yet.

im foreign?! hows that? im living in country where i was born, so how on earth am i foreign?! so if you really want to act as a grammar police, then please learn how to use words, not only how to properly spell. also, your comment was a joke? even bad jokes are at least a bit funny. your wasnt. you dont know meaning of word foreign, you dont know meaning of word joke, and thats why you dont see your stupidity.

[lordnex]

Best of 3 trips. Maps selected by impartial panel (maybe Chuuuuck, Lindax, & hiddendragon as all are out of the tourney). Settings selected by the panel (I vote chained, fog and no spoils! ). No repeated players (e.g. 9 from THOTA and 9 from Nemesis)

How about we just extend the challenge 20 games?

No. No. Absolutely against it.. as always I don't support changing the rules DURING the competition. It was stated in rules, before CC started, how would ties be broken and we all signed up and started playing agreeing with that. One game - no spoils, classic might not be the best solution but that's it..




as for freak and trapyoung: you guys are boring our asses, please keep it private, thank you

[pmchugh]

Best of 3 trips. Maps selected by impartial panel (maybe Chuuuuck, Lindax, & hiddendragon as all are out of the tourney). Settings selected by the panel (I vote chained, fog and no spoils! ). No repeated players (e.g. 9 from THOTA and 9 from Nemesis)

How about we just extend the challenge 20 games?

No. No. Absolutely against it.. as always I don't support changing the rules DURING the competition. It was stated in rules, before CC started, how would ties be broken and we all signed up and started playing agreeing with that. One game - no spoils, classic might not be the best solution but that's it..




as for freak and trapyoung: you guys are boring our asses, please keep it private, thank you

I'm pretty sure in the rules it said that if you could agree on another tiebrake in a timely manner you can do that instead.

However I'm rather suspicious of this comment as I detect sarcasm

How about we just extend the challenge 20 games?

[pmchugh]

Actually can't find that in the rules, guess we should just play the classic trips game (assuming its needed).

[Blitzaholic]

Best of 3 trips. Maps selected by impartial panel (maybe Chuuuuck, Lindax, & hiddendragon as all are out of the tourney). Settings selected by the panel (I vote chained, fog and no spoils! ). No repeated players (e.g. 9 from THOTA and 9 from Nemesis)

How about we just extend the challenge 20 games?

No. No. Absolutely against it.. as always I don't support changing the rules DURING the competition.

It would Not be changing the rules lordnex, read here:

Rule of thumb for the whole thing has been 2 clans can do anything they agree on. I am okay with us starting a little earlier than everyone else and running 60 if KoRT would like to also.

I think you need to talk to your whole clan and we can as well, and then see what we could possibly play for a fair compromise, perhaps let freak and Inc. discuss this. I think we all need to be open minded here. I doubt any 2 great clans if they tied would prefer settling it on one game.

[freakns]

first of all, challenge is still not over
now, if this ends up 20-20 tiebreaker will be one game, classic map, triples, no spoils, chained, sunny. i agree nothing is written in stone, but we entered this challenge with that rule, we havent talked about changing it until now, so we are sticking to the plan. simple as that.

[Blitzaholic]

Actually can't find that in the rules, guess we should just play the classic trips game (assuming its needed).

The rule is right here.

Rule of thumb for the whole thing has been 2 clans can do anything they agree on. I am okay with us starting a little earlier than everyone else and running 60 if KoRT would like to also.

so, we can decide if it is 1 game, best of 3, 20 more games, 100 more games?

I think we need a fair compromise as the rules states this is allowed, especially if it is a tie. I think that is the main reason this rule was implemented in the first place.

[lordnex]

viewtopic.php?f=441&t=106968

If there is a tie in any clan war, a one game tie-breaker will be set up with the following settings:

Type: Triples
Map: Classic
Play: Sequential
Spoils: None
Reinforcements: Chained
Fog: No


Any players can play in the tie-breaker game even if they have already played in their allotted number of games for that clan war.

[Qwert]

freak koji ti je ovo zeljak?(iznogao sam slovo s da mu malo istumbam pre tra zivanje)

Cam on Nemesis move forward!!!!

thanks lordnex for put mine map in signature

[Blitzaholic]

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=441&t=106968

If there is a tie in any clan war, a one game tie-breaker will be set up with the following settings:

Type: Triples
Map: Classic
Play: Sequential
Spoils: None
Reinforcements: Chained
Fog: No


Any players can play in the tie-breaker game even if they have already played in their allotted number of games for that clan war.

correct lordnex, but he also says and this is within the RULES.

Rule of thumb for the whole thing has been 2 clans can do anything they agree on.

Meaning we can play more than that. So, we need to reach and fair compromise if it is tied.

[Dako]

Lol stop arguing whether it is in the rules or not.

Just agree between 2 clans what format of tiebreaker you are going to have.

[Blitzaholic]

Lol stop arguing whether it is in the rules or not.

Just agree between 2 clans what format of tiebreaker you are going to have.

we are, the rules say both, they seem to have some members wanting only 1 game, and some of their members are suggesting best of 3, we are thinking more, so I am asking them, what do they think is a fair compromise?

I am sure no one really wants it to come down to luck. For example, let's say the one game of classic, and we as thota get a drop of lucking up aussie bonus early in no cards, well, it is a huge advantage for us and practically over and us winning on that luck drop would not seem right.


So, let's figure this out with some fair and realistic discussion based on skill, after all, this is what the CUP is about, not luck of one game to decide a tie.

[pmchugh]

Lol stop arguing whether it is in the rules or not.

Just agree between 2 clans what format of tiebreaker you are going to have.

we are, the rules say both, they seem to have some members wanting only 1 game, and some of their members are suggesting best of 3, we are thinking more, so I am asking them, what do they think is a fair compromise?

We are talking now amongst ourselves but it seems that the general consensus is just to end it with what was originally agreed upon, ie. the 1 game.

Personally I wish chuuuk had left no room to negotiate as it just complicates things. Either that or it should be agreed upon before the challenge starting.

[trapyoung]

im foreign?! hows that? im living in country where i was born, so how on earth am i foreign?! so if you really want to act as a grammar police, then please learn how to use words, not only how to properly spell. also, your comment was a joke? even bad jokes are at least a bit funny. your wasnt. you dont know meaning of word foreign, you dont know meaning of word joke, and thats why you dont see your stupidity.

Foreign to the English language, uh dur dur dur

[Blitzaholic]

Lol stop arguing whether it is in the rules or not.

Just agree between 2 clans what format of tiebreaker you are going to have.

Personally I wish chuuuk had left no room to negotiate as it just complicates things. Either that or it should be agreed upon before the challenge starting.

he did, he said all clans can do more games, no one wants it to come down to luck and us getting dealt the aussie bonus in no cards and winning like that? would you? seriously. think about it.




So, let's figure this out with some fair and realistic discussion based on skill, after all, this is what the CUP is about, not luck of one game to decide a tie.

fastposted, lol

here it is again.