Chuuuuck wrote:You are better off saying nothing than saying, "we are talking about it, changes are coming soon."
Chuuuuck wrote:Anything going on behind closed doors is a no-no.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderator: Clan Directors
Chuuuuck wrote:You are better off saying nothing than saying, "we are talking about it, changes are coming soon."
Chuuuuck wrote:Anything going on behind closed doors is a no-no.
stahrgazer wrote:These cd's have known for months that they had made this decision, and apparently very few others did.
Chuuuuck wrote:Haha yes, sad but true.
But what I meant by the first part, "you are better of saying nothing than something is coming," is you would be better off not having people even know a change is coming and there is nothing going on behind closed doors. Then just spring on them something new later.
But, you would ultimately be best off just putting it all out there for everyone to see. Otherwise everyone assumes the worst. I have faith you all will do the right thing, but I don't see why it has to take so long to get there.
chemefreak wrote: The danger of farming in the play-in round was just one aspect of an overall decision to wait on medals for this particular event. There was never a determination that all challenges were farming.
SirSebstar wrote:you mean like the fact that previous editions of this particular event also did not recieve medals for non finals games>?
SirSebstar wrote:you mean like the fact that previous editions of this particular event also did not recieve medals for non finals games>?
Incandenza wrote:SirSebstar wrote:you mean like the fact that previous editions of this particular event also did not recieve medals for non finals games>?
That isn't actually true. Every winner starting in the round of 16 in CC1 received medals. I don't believe the play-in rounds from CC1 qualified for medals, but those were much shorter, 21-game affairs rather than the larger 41-game challenges in this year's first round.
Eyestone wrote:SirSebstar wrote:you mean like the fact that previous editions of this particular event also did not recieve medals for non finals games>?
Like Inca points out, you are entirely wrong here. Everyone got a medal from the 1st round of the cup last year, so I really don't understand how anyone can say that the final 8 isn't automatically qualified to get a medal this year. It should be the same thing... Final 16 should even be good enough.
jpcloet wrote:Eyestone wrote:SirSebstar wrote:you mean like the fact that previous editions of this particular event also did not recieve medals for non finals games>?
Like Inca points out, you are entirely wrong here. Everyone got a medal from the 1st round of the cup last year, so I really don't understand how anyone can say that the final 8 isn't automatically qualified to get a medal this year. It should be the same thing... Final 16 should even be good enough.
When going back to issue historical medals anything that looked like a clan war and quacked like a clan war got one, primarily based on size.
Chuuuuck wrote:jpcloet wrote:When going back to issue historical medals anything that looked like a clan war and quacked like a clan war got one, primarily based on size.
This statement made me laugh...
Our clanchallenge against AoC was created March 4th, and finished April 22nd. All I as a normal member officially heard from the CD's during this period was "no medals issued" when it was moved to completed, without any explanation whatsoever. I know SirSebstar was better aware of the discussions (I believe in his role as clanleader), but you can't expect a clanleader to explain and defend a CD's decission.jpcloet wrote:All of the CLA was aware of it April 24th
MichelSableheart wrote:Our clanchallenge against AoC was created March 4th, and finished April 22nd. All I as a normal member officially heard from the CD's during this period was "no medals issued" when it was moved to completed, without any explanation whatsoever. I know SirSebstar was better aware of the discussions (I believe in his role as clanleader), but you can't expect a clanleader to explain and defend a CD's decission.jpcloet wrote:All of the CLA was aware of it April 24th
Your communication has been lacking here.
Rodion wrote:I want to know about the deadline for creation of batch 2 games!
Rodion wrote:Whether you like it or not, the Lack/Andy/JP hold the cards and I see no reason to keep pressing them when they already showed they're willing to change the policies and award the medals soon(ish). I mean, the difference between getting a clan war medal now or 5 months in the future will not make or break my CC life.
I think it's pointless to complain until the policies are published. Unless they take more than, say, 2 months from now to be effective.
Rodion wrote:I said it's not okay to keep arguing over a medal that the mods already told them they are probably going to give you later on. Just wait. If they don't give it, then you complain.
Rodion wrote:I said it's not okay to keep arguing over a medal that the mods already told them they are probably going to give you later on. Just wait. If they don't give it, then you complain.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users