Conquer Club

Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade (22-19) Final 1/27

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade (22-19) Final 1/27

Postby I_AM_BOGEY on Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:48 pm

The Imperial Dragoons are pleased to announce that The New Crusade have accepted our challenge for a battle.

Primary Contacts
ID: Primary I_AM_BOGEY, secondary 4 U 2 NV
TNC: Primary Black_Knight_6, secondary ckyrias

41 games total - 1 tiebreaker POW game (see Below, played first)
7 DUBS, 6 TRIPS AND 7 QUADS for each home team's set. Each clan will send out all home games on their set at one time.


batch 1 game: POW game between leaders September 12th
batch 2 games: From winning side of POW game September 28th (date dependent)
batch 3 games: From losing side of POW game October 12th (date dependent)

Rules
ā€¢ No freestyle, no speed, no manual deployments and no beta maps.
ā€¢ A minimum of 10 unique players must be used; the maximum game usage per player is 12 games.
ā€¢ If a player is used in more than 12 games, the game(s) in question will be remade with a substitute and not forfeited.
ā€¢ The 12 hour fog rule will be a courtesy with no enforceable penalties, applying only to those games where seeing the first turn matters. If this rule is broken, the changes made to the map should be posted in game chat.

POW game details:
The first game will be the pow (tiebreaker) game which will be a trips game played on map seige. The first leader to get eliminated from the losing team's side is captured and unable to participate in their visitor games. The winning team then makes a list of home games and picks one that the leader is held on. If the visitor team wins, they get their leader back and then they can play in their home games. If the visitor team loses, their leader remains captured and can not play in any more games. Settings for POW game will be Trips, no cards, chained, foggy.

Good luck to everyone that participates in this challenge. We are looking forward to a great challenge with this new twist.



show: PoW game


show: TNC home games set 1


show: ID home games set 2



show: ID games played


show: TNC games played
Last edited by I_AM_BOGEY on Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:09 pm, edited 24 times in total.
User avatar
Cook I_AM_BOGEY
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:11 am
Location: Eureka

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby QoH on Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:52 pm

Now that's pretty tricky... Who thought of that?

It will be interesting to see how this affects the rest of the war.
Image
Please don't invite me to any pickup games. I will decline the invite.
Major QoH
 
Posts: 1817
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:37 pm

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby ckyrias on Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:20 pm

its going to be fun! i think it was BK's idea.

good luck Dragoons and may we win! :D
Image

Image
User avatar
Sergeant ckyrias
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:27 pm

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby Edgron on Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:29 pm

Good luck to all
Image
User avatar
Major Edgron
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:10 am

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby 4 U 2 NV on Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:51 pm

ckyrias wrote:its going to be fun! i think it was BK's idea.

good luck Dragoons and may we win! :D


twas BlackKnight_6's idea. it was the lesser of his crazy ideas that he threw out lol

cheers and good luck to both clans!
Image
User avatar
Colonel 4 U 2 NV
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby QoH on Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:57 pm

Well, this one should be a good one!

Not a large margin of victory for who ever wins.
Image
Please don't invite me to any pickup games. I will decline the invite.
Major QoH
 
Posts: 1817
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:37 pm

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby Ishihara on Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:43 pm

This sounds like a fun one... thanks to BK for the idea, and a general welcome and good luck to all of TNC! Oh, and I think I can speak for all of ID when I say that we'll take very good care of whichever of your leaders we get to keep prisoner for the duration of this battle... ;)
Image
User avatar
Major Ishihara
 
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:30 pm
Location: in the land of snow and cold

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby BlackKnight_6 on Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:57 pm

Hi guys

Yes, it was my crazy idea. Let's see what happens! It should make for some interesting game chat, and discussion here in the thread too (e.g. "help! help! you gotta get me outta here, they are in violation of Geneva convention" etc etc)

We will be getting started soon. And Ishihara, you can be sure that if the POW falls into OUR hands they will be offered the best crusader treatment. So good that they might not want to return to their original clan ever...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class BlackKnight_6
 
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:17 pm

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby BlackKnight_6 on Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:59 pm

A clarification.

I_AM_BOGEY wrote:
POW game details:
The first game will be the pow (tiebreaker) game which will be a trips game played on a map tbd. The first leader to get eliminated from the losing team's side is captured and unable to participate in their home games. The losing team then makes a list of home games and picks one that the leader is held on. If the home team wins, they get their leader back and then they can play in the away games. If the home team loses, their leader remains captured and can not play in any more games.


The third sentence should read: The WINNING team then makes a list of home games and picks one that the opponent leader is held on. We play those games first (to try and get the leader back). Then the losing team submits their games.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class BlackKnight_6
 
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:17 pm

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby 4 U 2 NV on Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:16 am

BlackKnight_6 wrote:A clarification.

I_AM_BOGEY wrote:
POW game details:
The first game will be the pow (tiebreaker) game which will be a trips game played on a map tbd. The first leader to get eliminated from the losing team's side is captured and unable to participate in their home games. The losing team then makes a list of home games and picks one that the leader is held on. If the home team wins, they get their leader back and then they can play in the away games. If the home team loses, their leader remains captured and can not play in any more games.


The third sentence should read: The WINNING team then makes a list of home games and picks one that the opponent leader is held on. We play those games first (to try and get the leader back). Then the losing team submits their games.


yup. sorry for the miscommunication on my part to bogey. i went through the pm's and understood it as you stated now. this change will be made.
Image
User avatar
Colonel 4 U 2 NV
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby I_AM_BOGEY on Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:17 am

BlackKnight_6 wrote:A clarification.

I_AM_BOGEY wrote:
POW game details:
The first game will be the pow (tiebreaker) game which will be a trips game played on a map tbd. The first leader to get eliminated from the losing team's side is captured and unable to participate in their home games. The losing team then makes a list of home games and picks one that the leader is held on. If the home team wins, they get their leader back and then they can play in the away games. If the home team loses, their leader remains captured and can not play in any more games.


The third sentence should read: The WINNING team then makes a list of home games and picks one that the opponent leader is held on. We play those games first (to try and get the leader back). Then the losing team submits their games.


Ok, so I edited the original post and changes are in red. Sorry for the miss communication. Please check to make sure it reads correctly now. :mrgreen: :oops:
User avatar
Cook I_AM_BOGEY
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:11 am
Location: Eureka

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby BlackKnight_6 on Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:59 pm

All looks okay now!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class BlackKnight_6
 
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:17 pm

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby chemefreak on Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:30 pm

Okay. If I understand this correctly, if the losing leader of the PoW game does not get "rescued" in the 2nd set then that person will only be allowed to play in one game the entire war...which means they cannot get a medal. Is this right? And are we sure about this?
:twisted: ChemE :twisted:
Image
Š±Ń€Š°Ń‚ŃŒŃ Š² руŠŗŠ¾ŃŃ‚ŠŗŠ°Ń…
I ā™„ ++The Legion++
User avatar
Lieutenant chemefreak
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Columbus (Franklin Park), Ohio

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby I_AM_BOGEY on Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:02 pm

chemefreak wrote:Okay. If I understand this correctly, if the losing leader of the PoW game does not get "rescued" in the 2nd set then that person will only be allowed to play in one game the entire war...which means they cannot get a medal. Is this right? And are we sure about this?



From what I understand, that is correct. 8-[
User avatar
Cook I_AM_BOGEY
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:11 am
Location: Eureka

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby chemefreak on Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:04 pm

I_AM_BOGEY wrote:
chemefreak wrote:Okay. If I understand this correctly, if the losing leader of the PoW game does not get "rescued" in the 2nd set then that person will only be allowed to play in one game the entire war...which means they cannot get a medal. Is this right? And are we sure about this?



From what I understand, that is correct. 8-[


Sounds interesting. Since this was Blackknight's idea I will issue privs under this theory. Cheers, and good luck to all.
:twisted: ChemE :twisted:
Image
Š±Ń€Š°Ń‚ŃŒŃ Š² руŠŗŠ¾ŃŃ‚ŠŗŠ°Ń…
I ā™„ ++The Legion++
User avatar
Lieutenant chemefreak
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Columbus (Franklin Park), Ohio

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby TheCrown on Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:47 pm

What if it was someone else's idea? Why does BlackKnight get special treatment??? :lol:
User avatar
Colonel TheCrown
 
Posts: 1531
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:25 pm
Location: California, US

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby I_AM_BOGEY on Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:55 am

TheCrown wrote:What if it was someone else's idea? Why does BlackKnight get special treatment??? :lol:



He gets to be held captive! :mrgreen:
User avatar
Cook I_AM_BOGEY
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:11 am
Location: Eureka

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby I_AM_BOGEY on Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:56 am

POW game up! Let's get this party started. Good luck! =D> :mrgreen:
User avatar
Cook I_AM_BOGEY
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:11 am
Location: Eureka

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby BlackKnight_6 on Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:57 am

It looks like the Crusaders managed to keep their castle against the Imperial Dragoons siege.

Nesterdude has been taken prisoner!

Game 9738172

He will be held for the duration of the first half of the war. We will inform you what map he is held on when we submit our home maps.

Do not worry, TNC will respect the Geneva Convention and treat nesterdude well... Updates here.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class BlackKnight_6
 
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:17 pm

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby 4 U 2 NV on Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:46 am

sounds good. whenever you're ready. i think a week should suffice. if you need more time, let us know, but the sooner the better.

and we're fine without nester. let him rot in prison :twisted:
Image
User avatar
Colonel 4 U 2 NV
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby Chewie1 on Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:58 am

4 U 2 NV wrote:
ckyrias wrote:its going to be fun! i think it was BK's idea.

good luck Dragoons and may we win! :D


twas BlackKnight_6's idea. it was the lesser of his crazy ideas that he threw out lol

cheers and good luck to both clans!



Shoulda done your home work ID, TNC are unnervingly good on siege
Image
User avatar
Captain Chewie1
 
Posts: 1190
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:03 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby 4 U 2 NV on Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:44 pm

Chewie1 wrote:
4 U 2 NV wrote:
ckyrias wrote:its going to be fun! i think it was BK's idea.

good luck Dragoons and may we win! :D


twas BlackKnight_6's idea. it was the lesser of his crazy ideas that he threw out lol

cheers and good luck to both clans!



Shoulda done your home work ID, TNC are unnervingly good on siege


i looked through map rank. i think nester had even more experience on it than any of them.
Image
User avatar
Colonel 4 U 2 NV
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby TheCrown on Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:25 pm

We got lucky. Wow, throwing nester under the bus... nothing like friendly clan-mates, eh? :mrgreen:
User avatar
Colonel TheCrown
 
Posts: 1531
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:25 pm
Location: California, US

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby 4 U 2 NV on Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:16 pm

TheCrown wrote:We got lucky. Wow, throwing nester under the bus... nothing like friendly clan-mates, eh? :mrgreen:


nawww. just stating that we were just as comfortable with that map as you guys were.
Image
User avatar
Colonel 4 U 2 NV
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Imperial Dragoons vs. The New Crusade

Postby TheCrown on Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:08 pm

LOL... it was the rotting in prison I was referring to.
User avatar
Colonel TheCrown
 
Posts: 1531
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:25 pm
Location: California, US

Next

Return to Complete Challenges

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users