Conquer Club

Posted: **Mon Feb 18, 2013 6:19 pm**

LOTZ VS The Headless Horsemen 11 - LOTZ -13

Posted: **Mon Feb 18, 2013 6:53 pm**

It's suddenly gone quiet on the HH front. I wonder why....
8-)

Posted: **Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:07 am**

Updated ;}

LOTZ VS The Headless Horsemen 12 - LOTZ -14

Last edited by Keefie on Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:39 pm, edited 11 times in total.

5 days and no update whats up since we took the Lead the updates stoped ???? :lol:

Teddy

Posted: **Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:30 pm**

Good looking battle

Posted: **Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:41 pm**

ScaryTeded wrote:Updated ;}

LOTZ VS The Headless Horsemen 12 - LOTZ -14

Last edited by Keefie on Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:39 pm, edited 11 times in total.

5 days and no update whats up since we took the Lead the updates stoped ????
Teddy

Looking good guys! Always got to love the underdog! Keep it up! =D>

Posted: **Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:09 am**

Is it possible to get the scoreboard updated please?

Posted: **Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:50 am**

LOTZ VS The Headless Horsemen 12 - LOTZ -15

This gets old as HH agreed to do the thread If we are losing in my war threads ( It`s GAME just post the results ) !!!

Posted: **Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:49 am**

Apologies for the delay, I've had an extremely busy week.

I must say that I've been very impressed with Lotz, they certainly don't deserve their current ranking. Despite being far closer than I feel comfortable with I still expect HH to pull this one off.

Posted: **Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:56 pm**

Keefie wrote:Apologies for the delay, I've had an extremely busy week.

I must say that I've been very impressed with Lotz, they certainly don't deserve their current ranking. Despite being far closer than I feel comfortable with I still expect HH to pull this one off.

No worries, I think Custer felt his team was about to make a big comeback also...

Posted: **Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:07 am**

Jimmy V wrote:
No worries, I think Custer felt his team was about to make a big comeback also...

Your mission if you chose to accept it is. Show me the 9 games LotZ will win for victory, coz I can show you the 11 we'll win. :lol:

Posted: **Sun Feb 24, 2013 10:48 pm**

do we not need 7 more for 25 wins to take it not 9?

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:28 am**

Yellow Peril wrote:do we not need 7 more for 25 wins to take it not 9?

Yes you do, show me which ones you will win ?

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:35 am**

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:21 pm**

We will get back to you on that one

Posted: **Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:14 am**

Yellow Peril wrote:We will get back to you on that one

Posted: **Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:06 am**

I'll make it easy for you

HH Wins

Game 12278269 World 2.1 Q
Game 12340318 Stalingrad D
Game 12340260 Atlantis Q
Game 12346818 Das Schloss D
Game 12346833 Europe 1914 T
Game 12346856 Supermax Q
Game 12346867 City Mogul Q
Game 12340261 Stalingrad Q

LotZ Wins

Game 12340275 Middle East D
Game 12340258 Iberia Q

Undecided

Game 12340272 Lunar War D - Leaning to LotZ
Game 12346869 Flanders 1302 - Leaning to LotZ

Do the Math The final score will probably be 27-22 to the Horsemen

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:39 am**

I am not really sure what your point is? I never said we would win this, just confirming the number of wins needed to claim victory. I don't know what "MATH" is as this term is foreign in Australia. We call it mathematics I do believe as I think you do too.

Anyhow, well fought war to all concerned. Well done HH.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:57 pm**

Yellow Peril wrote:I am not really sure what your point is? I never said we would win this, just confirming the number of wins needed to claim victory. I don't know what "MATH" is as this term is foreign in Australia. We call it mathematics I do believe as I think you do too.

Anyhow, well fought war to all concerned. Well done HH.

When I made the post you needed 9 to win, by the time you read it you only needed 7.

Cheers
Keefie

ps: Math or Maths is a very common abbreviation for the more formal 'Mathematics', but we'll make allowances as your Australian.