Moderators: Clan Directors, Global Moderators


jpcloet wrote:http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3372/3256614490_dbd002d6cb_o.jpg

Optimus Prime wrote:The system is not flawed if it was intentionally designed to rank clans according to total wins. Some rankings use winning percentage, others use total wins. Just because you want to be on top doesn't mean the system is flawed, Blitzaholic.


jpcloet wrote:Uses the same calculation as American Baseball. Done because not all clans play every week. Hence an early bye week would compromise total wins.
Think about it this way then.
ID is 5 games over .500
THOTA is only 4 games over .500
Would a clan who currently sits at 1-0 be top spot? (rhetorical question)
You can rectify the situation in your current matchup. Let your games do the talking.

Knight2254 wrote:Why don't you just finish your games and then we'll be able to see who is really in first. This is just a temp scoreboard anyways.



Blitzaholic wrote:jpcloet wrote:Uses the same calculation as American Baseball. Done because not all clans play every week. Hence an early bye week would compromise total wins.
Think about it this way then.
ID is 5 games over .500
THOTA is only 4 games over .500
Would a clan who currently sits at 1-0 be top spot? (rhetorical question)
You can rectify the situation in your current matchup. Let your games do the talking.
and 3rd place team says 11-8 and only 1 game back???????
it should be more than 1 game back from 12-7, say the 12-7 team lost, and is now 12-8, that is 1 game, but still better than 11-8, so it should be at least 1.5 from the 12-7 record
and 11-8 would be even more back then a 7-3 record.
re-read

jpcloet wrote:ID can join as slowly as they like, I am watching the games though.
12-7 vs 11-8, if the second team wins, being 1 back is now even. 12-8 and 12-8. It's only a full game if the teams are playing each other.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest