QoH wrote:I don't think people give the pigs enough credit. It's an outstanding bunch of players, and they sure are tough to beat.
jpcloet wrote:That's why you need to play wars, IMO, clans like ID and DB are too low.
Leehar wrote:Everybody does start on 1000 so I guess there can't be any complaint about that, but I think there must be a flaw that all a badly performing clan could theoretically need to do is re-form to jump back up the list...
Leehar wrote:Yeah, obviously it will be a bit troublesome tho considering the rest of us did all start at 1k, so it seems weird if other new clans started below that, but it's also seems unfeasible that a clan seemingly pops up into the top 16 automatically upon creation. I assume the weighting system etc is supposed to limit the effects of that, but ...
WPBRJ wrote:Leehar wrote:Yeah, obviously it will be a bit troublesome tho considering the rest of us did all start at 1k, so it seems weird if other new clans started below that, but it's also seems unfeasible that a clan seemingly pops up into the top 16 automatically upon creation. I assume the weighting system etc is supposed to limit the effects of that, but ...
i agree when this ranking started maybe all clans established should start with a 1000 makes sense there established and had wars and turnaments under there belts already
but from that point on new clans with no experienced and unestablished should maybe start with 850
dint even think of this 4 new clans in top 20 takes ranks of clans like dynasty 4 spots back that means we have to probably play 2 wars and win to get those spots back. i dam well know we can beat probly 3 out of 4 of them clans we already beat koa in small chalenge (ACC) they also went ahead of some other good solid clans myth,, tffs, g1, leagon, bpb, these are all clans that new clans went ahead of and i do not think one of them had played each other
WPBRJ wrote:we at dynasty have been extremely busy in wars and turnys and we lost 2 point and our only new stat is a win over aka 25 to 15 in the ACC who is ranked ahead of us and then i see 4 new clans enter and there ranked as high as they are. i think some thing needs tweaking
i am not complaining about DYNASTY's rank i am a firm believer of working your way up thats why you dont see us challenging the top clans we have more fun playing lower ranked clans anyway. i am also not saying there bad clans maybe one or two deserve a decent rank
Leehar wrote:@FD, I can understand why you didn't want to post the less than 150 ranking, but do you know how we can still find it? (Either a link, or do we just feed your data file into the formula tab you've linked elsewhere?)
Otherwise, this new clan jumping into the top 20 thing still worries me...
Leehar wrote:jackin_u_up wrote:I can never find AFOS in these rankings ???? Whats up ?
Like with 1rfg, I suspect your weighting is still below 150?
Army of GOD wrote:Is there a reason the Spelunkers of Hell aren't on here...?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest