chemefreak wrote:Clans are all about teams We allowed the 1v1 clan challenge because it was a fun idea and it qualified under the clan tournament rules. Can you imagine a clan war with 41 singles games...getting a medal? Admin would shit itself!
CC clans are about groups of players who come together as a team to play games competitively against other teams of CC users with each team hoping to represent their clan well.
These games can include many different formats and settings: 1v1 is just as valid a setting as dubs, trips, or quads. I never understood the arguments that 1v1 games weren't valid because they don't involve communication with teammates or even the argument that more luck is involved. Even if the last argument were true, which I'd debate, why would Admin "shit itself" and go out of their way to prevent a clan from playing a 41 game all-1v1 clan war??? That view is akin to saying that the Davis Cup should exclude singles tennis games because competitions are played between teams and that there is no place for 1v1 in team competition.... The argument doesn't stand up in the tennis world and it shouldn't stand up in the CC world.
Who does it hurt if a 41-game all-1v1 clan war is the preference of the two clans involved??? Which clan is being hurt by it? How is the rest of the clan community hurt by it? It makes very little sense. The only people hurt by such limiting rules are the folks who desire to play under those settings but are prevented from doing so by those who feel it is inappropriate. I have no problem with those who feel that way... as long as they don't impose their will on me and others in the clan community who are big fans of 1v1.