Moderator: Clan Directors
Also, it seems unlikely that Random will be a clear winner, but since Option 1 is currently in a firm 2nd-place, instead of having a run-off between those 2 options, which would just polarise positions, would anyone be interested in instead having the run-off between the compromise positions that differing people have offered (and what exactly are the mechanics of them?)
qwert wrote:i still believe that option 3 are better option , who are make compromise between low and high clans, something what option 1 and 2 can not achieve.
well get ready for total random draw,, these will be interesting to watch.
jghost7 wrote:Just a reminder, option 1b does have a random element to it.
Thanks,
J
Leehar wrote:jghost7 wrote:Just a reminder, option 1b does have a random element to it.
Thanks,
J
Does Option 2 deserve to have a 2B as well?
ie First Round Bye's/Seeds to the top 4/8, random everywhere else (FA Cup style?)
Leehar wrote:jghost7 wrote:Just a reminder, option 1b does have a random element to it.
Thanks,
J
Does Option 2 deserve to have a 2B as well?
ie First Round Bye's/Seeds to the top 4/8, random everywhere else (FA Cup style?)
Leehar wrote:jghost7 wrote:Just a reminder, option 1b does have a random element to it.
Thanks,
J
Does Option 2 deserve to have a 2B as well?
ie First Round Bye's/Seeds to the top 4/8, random everywhere else (FA Cup style?)
IcePack wrote:Leehar wrote:jghost7 wrote:Just a reminder, option 1b does have a random element to it.
Thanks,
J
Does Option 2 deserve to have a 2B as well?
ie First Round Bye's/Seeds to the top 4/8, random everywhere else (FA Cup style?)
Like jghost said, the votes already expired. What's w the late push to alter the vote structure / options? Seriously, if we weren't ready to vote and wanted to keep discussing why did CD's start vote and put a 5 day time limit?
Bruceswar wrote:IcePack wrote:Leehar wrote:jghost7 wrote:Just a reminder, option 1b does have a random element to it.
Thanks,
J
Does Option 2 deserve to have a 2B as well?
ie First Round Bye's/Seeds to the top 4/8, random everywhere else (FA Cup style?)
Like jghost said, the votes already expired. What's w the late push to alter the vote structure / options? Seriously, if we weren't ready to vote and wanted to keep discussing why did CD's start vote and put a 5 day time limit?
Stop being so worried about the exact times. It is Easter. CD's have lives also. Relax a bit and go hunt some eggs.
crispybits wrote:There is no push, there is a suggestion. And as evidenced in this thread there have been other suggestions of varying shades of grey between options 1 and 2 made out of a desire to compromise and meet the wishes of all clans since the vote was opened. All I have done is asked if these will be considered, as I believe all of them have merit and the final decision should be the one that brings the most amount of agreement between the most number of clans.
IcePack wrote:I'm not worried about times. I also have a life thanks bruce. What I'm concerned with is the push for changing terms and items in the vote when the first phase of the vote is now supposedly over.
Keefie wrote:IcePack wrote:I'm not worried about times. I also have a life thanks bruce. What I'm concerned with is the push for changing terms and items in the vote when the first phase of the vote is now supposedly over.
Because options 1 and 2 are the most divisive options. If anything can be done to tweak either that will keep the vast majority happy then I'm sure the CD's will consider it.
Many of us are prepared to compromise, a word that appears not to be in your dictionary.
crispybits wrote:There is no push, there is a suggestion. And as evidenced in this thread there have been other suggestions of varying shades of grey between options 1 and 2 made out of a desire to compromise and meet the wishes of all clans since the vote was opened. All I have done is asked if these will be considered, as I believe all of them have merit and the final decision should be the one that brings the most amount of agreement between the most number of clans.
IcePack wrote:I posted my thoughts on the new vote in CDF...
IcePack wrote:What I'm concerned with is the push for changing terms and items in the vote when the first phase of the vote is now supposedly over.
IcePack wrote:Posted in CDF as well, but:
What about option 1 where instead of 1 v 32, 2 v 31, 3 v 30...18 v 19
It's 1 v 19, 2 v 20, 3 v 21... 18 v 32
Each clan has an equally lower opponent then the next
josko.ri wrote:IcePack wrote:I posted my thoughts on the new vote in CDF...
You change your thoughts on daily basis, according to how are chances going for your solution.IcePack wrote:What I'm concerned with is the push for changing terms and items in the vote when the first phase of the vote is now supposedly over.
And just a day before that post, you were the one who suggested changing terms and items in the ongoing vote.IcePack wrote:Posted in CDF as well, but:
What about option 1 where instead of 1 v 32, 2 v 31, 3 v 30...18 v 19
It's 1 v 19, 2 v 20, 3 v 21... 18 v 32
Each clan has an equally lower opponent then the next
It seems like You cannot be consistent even with your own opinion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users