THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Abandoned challenges and other old information.

Moderators: Clan Directors, Global Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby crispybits on Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:15 pm

Absolutely - as a separate competition/one off war match a winner vs winner between CL and CC has a lot of merit (if it can be scheduled right, etc etc)
User avatar
Major crispybits
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:29 pm
Medals: 30
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (7)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby Vid_FISO on Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:15 pm

Leehar wrote:
crispybits wrote:Sorry eddie but I don't get it either - are you effectively now suggesting we split the competition in two? I don't see how the analogy works as the champions league is a whole different competition to the europa league, and each has their own winner. They do have a winner vs winner match for the european super cup, but that's a third separate competition which doesnt have anything like the attention on it or prestige (at least from an English perspective, it may be different on the continent) as the other two have.

The Community shield also has the League winner + FA Cup winner face each other?
Intriguing idea that for else-where


It's actually "by invitation", normally EPL Champions vs FA Cup winner but in years when one team wins both (won't be this season :-)) league runners up gets the gig.
User avatar
Major Vid_FISO
 
Posts: 888
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:06 pm
Location: Hants
Medals: 42
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (8) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby eddie2 on Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:20 pm

crispybits wrote:Sorry eddie but I don't get it either - are you effectively now suggesting we split the competition in two? I don't see how the analogy works as the champions league is a whole different competition to the europa league, and each has their own winner. They do have a winner vs winner match for the european super cup, but that's a third separate competition which doesnt have anything like the attention on it or prestige (at least from an English perspective, it may be different on the continent) as the other two have.


yes i am saying split it into 2...

the reason for this is that this event was started when there was only 20 clans and could easily be completed within 1 year there are now more than 50 clans. bottom half clans (lower than 26 on the f600) have the newcomers cup and top ranked can have this event... with both meeting each other after they win there event....

i have thought last season that this event is really for the top ranked clans and lower ranked ones are only there to make the figures up then like with last year there is arguments about start dates because it clashes with the previous years one. if we split the event into 2 it will make it more manageable and more appealing for lower ranked clans.. it will also make it more of a challenge for higher ranked clans. me personally i like to play games i can have a chance of winning against opponents that will make it fun to play. josko has also stated his view is that he would like to play clans of equal capability and does not like facing the lower ranked ones because it is 2 easy for them... this i would say is the same thoughts of most clan members when they play they want a chance to win or want a challenge in the teams they face.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant eddie2
 
Posts: 3812
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: jersey channel islands
Medals: 72
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (9)
Tournament Contribution (5) General Contribution (3)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby catnipdreams on Mon Apr 01, 2013 4:28 pm

I like the idea of two different events, or two phases of the same event, with the upper half of the clans producing a champion, and the lower half of the clans producing a champion, and then those two clans facing off. I haven't read every single post in this thread carefully, but it seems to me like this solution addresses most, if not all, of the concerns folks have.
User avatar
Brigadier catnipdreams
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 1:41 pm
Medals: 58
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (2)
Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (7)
General Achievement (10) Clan Achievement (12) Training Achievement (1)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby eddie2 on Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:05 pm

catnipdreams wrote:I like the idea of two different events, or two phases of the same event, with the upper half of the clans producing a champion, and the lower half of the clans producing a champion, and then those two clans facing off. I haven't read every single post in this thread carefully, but it seems to me like this solution addresses most, if not all, of the concerns folks have.


i see you are thinking the same as me.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant eddie2
 
Posts: 3812
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: jersey channel islands
Medals: 72
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (9)
Tournament Contribution (5) General Contribution (3)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby Qwert on Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:47 pm

heh, eddie your idea could be work in Uefa, because you have enough quality teams who can compete for Champion LEague title, but here things are very diferent.

You have so little top clans here, so If you have one Cup from 1 to 25 and other cup from 26 to 50, you have several problems.

In First Cup some teams will still be outsider, and can not compete against Top 8.
Lets say that KOrt become winner of first Cup, defeating in tough game other Top clan, what will be hes motive to play another match again very weak team from Cup 2 ?

These Super Finale will not be some great match,, its will be Joke Finale.

Like some pointed previous-we have newcomers cup who are perfect example what you say for these where all low ranked clan can compete, so why will now need to have almost identical competition , so called Cup 2 for teams from 25 to 50 place?

Well next year i will again proposed Option 3, maybe these time people will recognize true value of these format ;)
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9175
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Medals: 77
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (6)
Training Achievement (2) Map Contribution (8) Tournament Contribution (22) General Contribution (4)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby eddie2 on Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:01 pm

Did i say make a matching event like the newcomers cup or did i say incorperate it in to this cup
Image
User avatar
Sergeant eddie2
 
Posts: 3812
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: jersey channel islands
Medals: 72
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (9)
Tournament Contribution (5) General Contribution (3)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby eddie2 on Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:08 pm

Sorry for double post. You say it will be unfair for the final 1v1 but which ever format this goes with out of the options would it not be unfair for 10+ clans. Like what someone else said before this way to do it takes out 95 percent of the arguements it also means clans are not signing up for something that could last 18 months
Image
User avatar
Sergeant eddie2
 
Posts: 3812
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: jersey channel islands
Medals: 72
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (9)
Tournament Contribution (5) General Contribution (3)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby Doc_Brown on Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:19 pm

It's an interesting proposal. Let me offer a variation on it: How about a super-cup tournament that will host the winners of CCup, CL, ACC, and NCC? Granted, now we're talking 2 additional wars, but a competition between those winners is likely to be a pretty good event. That way we're not talking about a potential #1 vs #25. You could see a #1 win CCup, a #4 win CL, a #7 win ACC, and a new #15 or so win NCC.

I realize this is starting to get off topic again. Since Eddie had brought up a top v. bottom type event, I thought this could take a form like that. If CCup retains a strict ranking-based bracket structure and starts to cater more to top clans while the ACC is more oriented to the lower ranked clans. Anyway. Not trying to push either way, I just wanted to throw out an idea that could incorporate Eddie's suggestion.
User avatar
Major Doc_Brown
 
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:06 pm
Location: Alabama
Medals: 28
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (2)
Clan Achievement (3) Training Achievement (2)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby IcePack on Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:59 pm

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!

Image

Please contact chapcrap if my game times run low.
User avatar
Major IcePack
Beta Tester Extraordinaire
Beta Tester Extraordinaire
 
Posts: 5563
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California
Medals: 94
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (9)
General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (15) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (11) General Contribution (8)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby Chariot of Fire on Mon Apr 01, 2013 9:52 pm

I have to ask a very important question. Are the CDs going to use the F400 or the previous results of the Cup to determine seedings? Personally I have always been in favour of using the previous cup results (mainly because those clans still have an obligation to play a 60 game challenge) so if seedings = byes then it makes sense. There now appears to be another very good reason.......

If the F400 is used then it may be said that a clan's standing on it is very important, right? Well a recent result in the Random League which went 10-2 in TOFU's favour actually cost us points. We would have had to win 11-1 not to lose points on the F400. This I find pretty ridiculous and is a very good reason why I support Josko's earlier statement that top-ranked clans should not be drawn against low-ranked clans - not when a 90% win rate is needed to maintain position on the F400.

So Eddie's proposal has merit - create two tournaments that run in synch, one for the Top 50% and one for the Bottom 50% and prevent the lopsided match-ups that we've witnessed in the past (e.g. #1 vs #32) because those challenges don't produce winners - they produce one clan that lost (probably badly) and the other clan that also lost (position on the F400) which is a ridiculous scenario.

If so much weight is going to be given to the F400 then I feel it is imperative to avoid inequitable challenges.
Image
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
User avatar
General Chariot of Fire
 
Posts: 3116
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Hong Kong
Medals: 89
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (21) General Achievement (9) Clan Achievement (25)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby IcePack on Mon Apr 01, 2013 9:55 pm

Chariot of Fire wrote:I have to ask a very important question. Are the CDs going to use the F400 or the previous results of the Cup to determine seedings? Personally I have always been in favour of using the previous cup results (mainly because those clans still have an obligation to play a 60 game challenge) so if seedings = byes then it makes sense. There now appears to be another very good reason.......

If the F400 is used then it may be said that a clan's standing on it is very important, right? Well a recent result in the Random League which went 10-2 in TOFU's favour actually cost us points. We would have had to win 11-1 not to lose points on the F400. This I find pretty ridiculous and is a very good reason why I support Josko's earlier statement that top-ranked clans should not be drawn against low-ranked clans - not when a 90% win rate is needed to maintain position on the F400.

So Eddie's proposal has merit - create two tournaments that run in synch, one for the Top 50% and one for the Bottom 50% and prevent the lopsided match-ups that we've witnessed in the past (e.g. #1 vs #32) because those challenges don't produce winners - they produce one clan that lost (probably badly) and the other clan that also lost (position on the F400) which is a ridiculous scenario.

If so much weight is going to be given to the F400 then I feel it is imperative to avoid inequitable challenges.


This was the #2 clan (almost the #1 clan) literally playing dead last. Similar to the conqueror playing a 50 pt cook. (tho not a perfect example) It expects better than 10-2 for TOFU, which i would agree with. 10-2 going from very top to very bottom isnt exactly asking a lot. The fact it was random league just makes it a "little" bit harder, but random league is not the place to compete if you are so concerned of your rank.
Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!

Image

Please contact chapcrap if my game times run low.
User avatar
Major IcePack
Beta Tester Extraordinaire
Beta Tester Extraordinaire
 
Posts: 5563
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California
Medals: 94
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (9)
General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (15) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (11) General Contribution (8)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby Chariot of Fire on Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:11 pm

It's irrelevant if it is random league or not. If you seriously expect a top-ranked clan to beat even the worst clan by a margin of 90% every time then you seriously don't know much about the nature of this game, especially when the lower-ranked clan is picking half the maps.

My argument is that match-ups such as this should be avoided if possible in the draw for the Cup. If it's all random then so be it - that's the luck of the draw - but to orchestrate such an imbalance would be a mistake. It's a point that I believe deserves consideration.
Image
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
User avatar
General Chariot of Fire
 
Posts: 3116
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Hong Kong
Medals: 89
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (21) General Achievement (9) Clan Achievement (25)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby IcePack on Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:14 pm

Chariot of Fire wrote:It's irrelevant if it is random league or not. If you seriously expect a top-ranked clan to beat even the worst clan by a margin of 90% every time then you seriously don't know much about the nature of this game, especially when the lower-ranked clan is picking half the maps.

My argument is that match-ups such as this should be avoided if possible in the draw for the Cup. If it's all random then so be it - that's the luck of the draw - but to orchestrate such an imbalance would be a mistake. It's a point that I believe deserves consideration.


Not everytime. There's a reason why some "win some and lose some" and that there are margins of victory for each. And they dont consider whether its random or not. Which is why it would still expect you to come up with a solid performance.
Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!

Image

Please contact chapcrap if my game times run low.
User avatar
Major IcePack
Beta Tester Extraordinaire
Beta Tester Extraordinaire
 
Posts: 5563
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California
Medals: 94
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (9)
General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (15) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (11) General Contribution (8)

Re: THE OFFICIAL CC CONQUEROR’S CUP 4

Postby josko.ri on Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:36 pm

Chariot of Fire wrote:I have to ask a very important question. Are the CDs going to use the F400 or the previous results of the Cup to determine seedings? Personally I have always been in favour of using the previous cup results (mainly because those clans still have an obligation to play a 60 game challenge) so if seedings = byes then it makes sense. There now appears to be another very good reason.......

F400 is the best determination for seedings. If we go with your suggestion then for example, if CC4 started last month, someone unseeded will play vs damaged BOTFM (seeded), get easy win, and just because of that draw luck, they would get next year seeding place (assuming that 1.b option with 16 seeds win). The example is even worse if we use random draw (option 2.b), then someone will get golden draw and ticket for final 16 or final 8, which means they were not lucky just in this Cup by having great draw but are also lucky for next edition by getting seeding place. F400 presents clan performance over 2 years period and is for sure the best determination of clan strength/seedings. Placement in last Cup a lot depends on draw, so it is not the best determination of clan strength.

Chariot of Fire wrote:If the F400 is used then it may be said that a clan's standing on it is very important, right? Well a recent result in the Random League which went 10-2 in TOFU's favour actually cost us points. We would have had to win 11-1 not to lose points on the F400. This I find pretty ridiculous and is a very good reason why I support Josko's earlier statement that top-ranked clans should not be drawn against low-ranked clans - not when a 90% win rate is needed to maintain position on the F400.

Chariot of Fire wrote:If so much weight is going to be given to the F400 then I feel it is imperative to avoid inequitable challenges.

I do not see problem here. You were played vs the last clan on ranking so it is really normal to expect 11/1 win, lower result penalizing your clan, and that or higher give additional points to your clan. As IP said, if some from top of scoreboard plays vs Cook and achieve 10/2 result, he will lose more points than gain. If you think 11/1 is unreal to achieve, look at last KORT results in CL5. 8-0 in away field vs DB, 7-1 on away field vs OSA, 7-1 vs HH. And all those clans are much higher ranked than MB, so I do not see why expectation of 11-1 result to improve your rank is unreal expectation. It is very real expectations for given ranks of each clan, and you achieved lower result than expectation was so there goes your losing points.

Chariot of Fire wrote:So Eddie's proposal has merit - create two tournaments that run in synch, one for the Top 50% and one for the Bottom 50% and prevent the lopsided match-ups that we've witnessed in the past (e.g. #1 vs #32) because those challenges don't produce winners - they produce one clan that lost (probably badly) and the other clan that also lost (position on the F400) which is a ridiculous scenario.

That was something indirectly proposed as option 3 in previous voting, but option 3 was even better because both of "tournaments" are at the end included in one tournament. There were bottom 50% in round 1, bottom 75% in round 2, and then winners of those small "tournaments" buy their ticket to join top 8 in "their" tournament. In essence that was already proposed but not everyone is able to read between the lines.
Image
User avatar
General josko.ri
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:18 pm
Medals: 98
Conqueror Achievement (1) Monthly Leader Silver (1) Monthly Leader Bronze (2) Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2)
Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1) Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1)
Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (26) General Achievement (16) Clan Achievement (17) Tournament Contribution (1)

PreviousNext

Return to Clan Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Login