Moderator: Cartographers
The finalists have two weeks to tweak the map. These issues of color saturation, border visibility and font legibility can all be addressed and looked at.the.killing.44 wrote:I like #3 but as many times said before it's just too much on the eyes IMO. It's hard to read the territory names, the territories themselves seem very squished and the texture is a lot to behold. I absolutely love the title, though.
edbeard wrote:what you've just stated makes the case for everyone being able to make changes
"the changes made before the final round of voting made a significant difference in the outcome"
HEEELLLLOOOO!
/thoughts on this
WidowMakers wrote:edbeard wrote:what you've just stated makes the case for everyone being able to make changes
"the changes made before the final round of voting made a significant difference in the outcome"
HEEELLLLOOOO!
/thoughts on this
I agree. There should be updates allowed. Then as the maps change, people can adjust their votes. Just 1 update per day per map. It would allow for feedback to really be used and to see which map makers can take the input and apply it quickly and properly.
WM
the.killing.44 wrote:0 votes for #1 … ouch.
Sorry if this has been posted already, but when does voting end?
samuelc812 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:0 votes for #1 … ouch.
Sorry if this has been posted already, but when does voting end?
December 18
WidowMakers wrote:I agree. There should be updates allowed. Then as the maps change, people can adjust their votes. Just 1 update per day per map. It would allow for feedback to really be used and to see which map makers can take the input and apply it quickly and properly.
oaktown wrote:WidowMakers wrote:I agree. There should be updates allowed. Then as the maps change, people can adjust their votes. Just 1 update per day per map. It would allow for feedback to really be used and to see which map makers can take the input and apply it quickly and properly.
Interesting idea to allow updates mid-vote... why couldn't somebody have brought this up a few days ago?
wcaclimbing wrote:wow. where did all the #4 votes come from?
When I went to bed it was trailing way behind the others with only two votes.
Big jump...
ZeakCytho wrote:I didn't even know there were 69 regular foundry goers...and there's no announcement for this yet, so it's unlikely that random people not-foundry related voted.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users