Re: Increase the 50 Pending game limit.
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:31 pm
I maxed out on games waiting, and I can see that it is frustrating. I guess I could submit this and then see what lack says, but first thing is first... stickied!
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=471&t=110810
JoshyBoy wrote:If you could just make sure the original suggestion is updated that would be great aon. I think we would have to exclude speed games from this increase though.
Queen_Herpes wrote:I agree with AON. This should be implemented. Some players like to play a lot of games. Why limit them? There is no good reason mentioned in the previous posts against AON's suggestion.
AAFitz wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:I agree with AON. This should be implemented. Some players like to play a lot of games. Why limit them? There is no good reason mentioned in the previous posts against AON's suggestion.
Actually, the fact that CC is already the best value for the buck and offers more games than any other site, and more than most combined already is a good reason. Also, the fact that 50 current games limits the damage a point dumper can do is a good reason. Further, the fact that it protects over-zealous players from making too many games than they can handle is even a good reason.
You may not consider them good reasons, but that does not mean they are not.
I myself suggest that if anyone can find a site that offers more for the $25 than CC does in the way of games they can post it. If there is a competitor offering more, than by all means raising the number to be competitive makes sense. If not, being the absolute bargain in the world seems like it might be just fine as it is, especially given the number of other reasons that factor in.
army of nobunaga wrote:AAFitz wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:I agree with AON. This should be implemented. Some players like to play a lot of games. Why limit them? There is no good reason mentioned in the previous posts against AON's suggestion.
Actually, the fact that CC is already the best value for the buck and offers more games than any other site, and more than most combined already is a good reason. Also, the fact that 50 current games limits the damage a point dumper can do is a good reason. Further, the fact that it protects over-zealous players from making too many games than they can handle is even a good reason.
You may not consider them good reasons, but that does not mean they are not.
I myself suggest that if anyone can find a site that offers more for the $25 than CC does in the way of games they can post it. If there is a competitor offering more, than by all means raising the number to be competitive makes sense. If not, being the absolute bargain in the world seems like it might be just fine as it is, especially given the number of other reasons that factor in.
you are such a putz
go on with your 10 quads games and 20 1vs1's.....
maybe the rest of the ppl in cc are not quite as wimpy... maybe the rest... the OTHER 20000 ASSHOLES may want more.
The best bargain on the web? are you staff or just pretending to be? Why dont you let the ppl that actually pay the bills and run the site worry about bargain.
maybve they will worry I will not upgrade 5 more ppl these next 5 months If they dont change this easy to change thing?
Maybe fitz as always you are in way over your head and just putting in an opinion rather than fact or something worthwile..
swhocking
AAFitz wrote:Mod Edit
AAFitz wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:I agree with AON. This should be implemented. Some players like to play a lot of games. Why limit them? There is no good reason mentioned in the previous posts against AON's suggestion.
Actually, the fact that CC is already the best value for the buck and offers more games than any other site, and more than most combined already is a good reason. Also, the fact that 50 current games limits the damage a point dumper can do is a good reason. Further, the fact that it protects over-zealous players from making too many games than they can handle is even a good reason.
You may not consider them good reasons, but that does not mean they are not.
I myself suggest that if anyone can find a site that offers more for the $25 than CC does in the way of games they can post it. If there is a competitor offering more, than by all means raising the number to be competitive makes sense. If not, being the absolute bargain in the world seems like it might be just fine as it is, especially given the number of other reasons that factor in.
TheForgivenOne wrote:AAFitz wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:I agree with AON. This should be implemented. Some players like to play a lot of games. Why limit them? There is no good reason mentioned in the previous posts against AON's suggestion.
Actually, the fact that CC is already the best value for the buck and offers more games than any other site, and more than most combined already is a good reason. Also, the fact that 50 current games limits the damage a point dumper can do is a good reason. Further, the fact that it protects over-zealous players from making too many games than they can handle is even a good reason.
You may not consider them good reasons, but that does not mean they are not.
I myself suggest that if anyone can find a site that offers more for the $25 than CC does in the way of games they can post it. If there is a competitor offering more, than by all means raising the number to be competitive makes sense. If not, being the absolute bargain in the world seems like it might be just fine as it is, especially given the number of other reasons that factor in.
So why add in any more Options to this site? Since no other site comes close to us. Why add in 1v1 teams? Why add in 12 player games?
TheForgivenOne wrote:AAFitz wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:I agree with AON. This should be implemented. Some players like to play a lot of games. Why limit them? There is no good reason mentioned in the previous posts against AON's suggestion.
Actually, the fact that CC is already the best value for the buck and offers more games than any other site, and more than most combined already is a good reason. Also, the fact that 50 current games limits the damage a point dumper can do is a good reason. Further, the fact that it protects over-zealous players from making too many games than they can handle is even a good reason.
You may not consider them good reasons, but that does not mean they are not.
I myself suggest that if anyone can find a site that offers more for the $25 than CC does in the way of games they can post it. If there is a competitor offering more, than by all means raising the number to be competitive makes sense. If not, being the absolute bargain in the world seems like it might be just fine as it is, especially given the number of other reasons that factor in.
So why add in any more Options to this site? Since no other site comes close to us. Why add in 1v1 teams? Why add in 12 player games?
TheForgivenOne wrote:Exactly, Assassin was an easy way for multi's to get points, and an easy way to point dump, but it still got implemented. The whole "It's easy to point dump" Could be thrown on to a lot of suggestions.
Bruceswar wrote:somehow .. I doubt you will find that many people with over 50 waiting games. For those who can handle it, then well they should be able to. The abuse with this will not be large if at all.