Conquer Club

[GP/UI] No Fortifications / Reinforcements

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Postby wicked on Tue May 08, 2007 11:36 am

no shit sherlock. was a joke.
since he didn't use the form, can't take is seriously. I put as much effort into my response as he did with his "suggestion". :wink:
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby firth4eva on Tue May 08, 2007 11:45 am

wicked wrote:no shit sherlock. was a joke.
since he didn't use the form, can't take is seriously. I put as much effort into my response as he did with his "suggestion". :wink:


I was joking too.
And please don't swear. Mods are supposed to set an example.
User avatar
Captain firth4eva
 
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Postby Coleman on Tue May 08, 2007 12:01 pm

firth4eva wrote:
wicked wrote:no shit sherlock. was a joke.
since he didn't use the form, can't take is seriously. I put as much effort into my response as he did with his "suggestion". :wink:


I was joking too.
And please don't swear. Mods are supposed to set an example.


I like the swearing example you rat bastard. :D
Please don't ban me for that joke...
I'd use the 'form' but bureaucracy aside, how much is there really to say?
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby john1099 on Tue May 08, 2007 12:04 pm

wicked wrote:no shit sherlock. was a joke.
since he didn't use the form, can't take is seriously. I put as much effort into my response as he did with his "suggestion". :wink:


are you shitting me, thats not effin' swearing, thats a term commonly used throughout the world!

:)

By the way, I like the idea.. so Coleman, if you're not going to do it, I'll put it in a form for you, if you don't mind :)

No Cards + No Forts= Fair game! :)
GunnaRoolsUDrool wrote:yo mama has 3 titties, ones for milk, ones for water, ones out of order
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class john1099
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:14 am
Location: St. Catharines, ON

Postby Coleman on Tue May 08, 2007 12:58 pm

john1099 wrote:
wicked wrote:no shit sherlock. was a joke.
since he didn't use the form, can't take is seriously. I put as much effort into my response as he did with his "suggestion". :wink:


are you shitting me, thats not effin' swearing, thats a term commonly used throughout the world!

:)

By the way, I like the idea.. so Coleman, if you're not going to do it, I'll put it in a form for you, if you don't mind :)

No Cards + No Forts= Fair game! :)


I don't care, I don't want credit, I just want more toys, if that requires some sort of form, then by all means.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby john1099 on Tue May 08, 2007 1:04 pm

No Fortifications option, not unlike the "adjacent", "chained", or "unlimited" options. This option speaks for itself, so lets skip the mumbo jumbo, and go straight to the urgency!

I believe that the Urgency is 3.5, because it isn't that hard to do, and could be a fun option in games.

All credit goes to coleman ;)

Thanks,
John
GunnaRoolsUDrool wrote:yo mama has 3 titties, ones for milk, ones for water, ones out of order
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class john1099
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:14 am
Location: St. Catharines, ON

>>>>>>>>>>

Postby Keredrex on Tue May 08, 2007 1:13 pm

I think this would Feel Limiting....It could Work but It might also turn into an unending battle...the last 2 players would just keep running through eachothers territory by deploying everything in one area

Sure you could plan fortification during your deployment but once a player does that...then his enemy will deploy a massive force to run over it ....I don't know Set Up A POLL
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Keredrex
 
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:41 am
Location: New York

Postby Kid_A on Tue May 08, 2007 2:51 pm

wicked wrote:No one's forcing you to fortify. :wink:


:D
User avatar
Major Kid_A
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: San Francisco

Postby Risktaker17 on Tue May 08, 2007 3:58 pm

It sounds like a good idea I would never do it though.
User avatar
Captain Risktaker17
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:09 am

Postby RobinJ on Tue May 08, 2007 4:45 pm

john1099 wrote:No Cards + No Forts= Fair game! :)


Sounds more like a rather horrific nightmare to me. No Cards I don't mind, Chained fortifications I dislike, Adjacent fortifications I hate, No Fortifications I would hate more and if it were combined with No Cards I think I would hang myself! :sick:

But, since I know I am going to be told to just avoid playing the games, why not have some more options! \:D/
nmhunate wrote:Speak English... It is the language that God wrote the bible in.


Highest Score: 2437
Highest Place: 84
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class RobinJ
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:56 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Postby Spritzking on Tue May 08, 2007 4:52 pm

if you want to have more options

we can also have an option where you can just fortify 10 armies in total every turn.

or only fortify inside your continent.

or fortify from any place to any place

or only fortify (non-border)countries

and if we dont have enough then we can also combine fortifying styles.


i like the suggested idea btw :)
Major Spritzking
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:19 pm

Postby Coleman on Wed May 09, 2007 2:11 am

Spritzking wrote:if you want to have more options

we can also have an option where you can just fortify 10 armies in total every turn.

or only fortify inside your continent.

or fortify from any place to any place

or only fortify (non-border)countries

and if we dont have enough then we can also combine fortifying styles.


i like the suggested idea btw :)

If we ever have that many you should need to click a more options button to see them, just saying, clutter is bad.

On that note, and not to hijack my own topic, there has been some private talk amongst foundry members of maybe suggesting doing this with maps as well. Showing the more popular ones on top and having a more maps button to see the rest, or handle it with pages even.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby alex_white101 on Wed May 09, 2007 5:10 am

wicked wrote:No one's forcing you to fortify. :wink:


:lol:
''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class alex_white101
 
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am

Postby joeyjordison on Wed May 09, 2007 10:39 am

wicked wrote:no shit sherlock. was a joke.
since he didn't use the form, can't take is seriously. I put as much effort into my response as he did with his "suggestion". :wink:


all that he failed to put was a priority. seeing as some things are pretty hard to define then a priority isn't really necessary all the time. and come on there wasn't exactly anything else he could put to make life easier.

as for the actual suggestion i can see the reason for it but it would create some messed up games. if u go into oz then any armies u go in there with will never escape unless u get attacked.
User avatar
Major joeyjordison
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:10 am

Postby CreepyUncleAndy on Wed May 09, 2007 6:23 pm

Why not? (BTW, didn't I suggest this already? lol)
User avatar
Private CreepyUncleAndy
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:45 pm

Postby ffgamer9 on Thu May 10, 2007 1:47 am

hehe, 6 player freestyle rt circus maximus, no cards, no forts.

love the idea!!!
Private 1st Class ffgamer9
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:35 pm

Postby kwanton on Thu May 10, 2007 3:19 pm

good idea. if this ever gets implemented however i will stay far, far away. have fun with it tho :D
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby plysprtz on Fri May 11, 2007 12:02 am

but then you would spend the whole time building up your armies to attack his 3 and then you would and you would get bad dice get pissed off chuck your mouse across the room and say if only i could forti those 20 armies sitting in asia
1546 - top score
User avatar
Cook plysprtz
 
Posts: 471
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:43 pm
Location: chicago

Fortifications

Postby Jeffers049 on Tue Aug 21, 2007 2:11 pm

I was wondering if there could be a mode where there are absolutely no fortifications... it would make the game sorta interesting, any thoughts on the idea? :?:

~Jeffers049
Corporal Jeffers049
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:37 am

Re: Fortifications

Postby hotgun on Tue Aug 21, 2007 2:12 pm

Jeffers049 wrote:I was wondering if there could be a mode where there are absolutely no fortifications... it would make the game sorta interesting, any thoughts on the idea? :?:

~Jeffers049



ROTFLOL i really thought u were joking jeff =p
Corporal 1st Class hotgun
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby cena-rules on Tue Aug 21, 2007 2:28 pm

yeah id like this

there is a no cards so why not no forts?
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
User avatar
Lieutenant cena-rules
 
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Chat

Postby lalaland on Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:08 pm

I think it's a cool idea... although I personally would never play it.

I like my fortifications :D
I worship the dice gods
Image Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class lalaland
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:28 pm
Location: in lalaland... duh

Postby AndyDufresne on Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:32 pm

This idea was brought up a few weeks/months ago I remember. It was met with some people liking it, and others hating it. But no ruling was ever made on rejection or not.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24919
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Postby Coleman on Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:42 pm

Yeah it was my idea. And I'm not even sure I like it, but I had it, so I posted it.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18608
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

"No fortification" game option?

Postby T7 on Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:50 am

As well as escalating, chained and adjacent, I think a "no fortification" option would be interesting - it would increase strategy of deployment and increase the amount of forethought you put into your planning...
Highest score: 2039 24/6/11 (1910 16/2/10, 1903 6/1/09)
User avatar
Major T7
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:40 am
Location: Australia

PreviousNext

Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users