qwert wrote:Well i think that will be good that you have option to remove finished tournaments from Tournaments list in game finder, and you all ways can bring back by click on [add finished ].
PLAYER57832 wrote:Uh qwert, this option already exists.
Just look up to the top selections, you can choose only waiting games, only active games, only finished games or any combination of those.
SirSebstar wrote:try this link then.
it goes to a finder that shows only tournaments, and you can select open, closed. ect..
what more is needed?
SirSebstar wrote:if the ddesire is to see games from a specifick tournament, you can simply enter the tournament.(in the game finder)
SirSebstar wrote:if i comprehend it correctly, he wants all the finished tournaments removed from the gamefinder, tournament section as some kind of option. how this should be accomplished i do not know. Also, all ournaments are searchable, the definition of being open or closed is not a parameter that is objective. it is up to the TD to close tourny's
qwert wrote:ok,guys these is not funny, why the hell not create something simple,like i suggest, and create something who its even more complicated??? Who create these mess now in Game finder??
lackattack wrote:Thanks for proposing this solution qwert! Finally, we went with timmytuttut88's approach instead because that one was very simple.
Sniper08 wrote:the new feature is worse than the old one,this suggestion is well better than the one that got implementedlackattack wrote:Thanks for proposing this solution qwert! Finally, we went with timmytuttut88's approach instead because that one was very simple.
simple isnt better in this case ,the tournaments tab doesnt give you game numbers and now the drop box is gone which makes you type in the tournament name in order to get the game numbers.i know your probably gonna say its only a partial match needed but if all your tournaments start with the same type of name e.g.Sniper's 1v1 ... just typing sniper isnt enough cause i get a lot of game numbers.the old system is better than this one and this suggestion is better than both
Users browsing this forum: No registered users