Show only active tournaments in Game Finder

[Sniper08]

any word on this ,dako put up a poll in GD similar to this suggestion but we havent heard anything since.

[qwert]

what words? do you realised that any sugestion need to sit here in sugestion forum for 3 years,before implementation? These is facts, actualy he can sit here for 3 years and then lack can say " i dont want to implement". And these is something what become annoing.
And after 3 years you will have list like 10000 finished and active tournament in game finder.

551 actve
3835 finished

note"now i find that in game finder tournamnet list you also have an abandoned tournament
These become quite serius problem.

[Sniper08]

yea i know how long it takes but i thought since a poll was put up in GD that this one might be different and get implemented within a few months instead of years

[greenoaks]

who are the 3 people to vote No ?

what are your reasons ?

[qwert]

ok,guys these is not funny, why the hell not create something simple,like i suggest, and create something who its even more complicated??? Who create these mess now in Game finder??

[PepeAtila]

ok,guys these is not funny, why the hell not create something simple,like i suggest, and create something who its even more complicated??? Who create these mess now in Game finder??

In my opinion it was working fine ... This your proposal would improve it.
Adding something similar to "Game Status" I mean "Tournament status" ... "Active" or "Finished".

However for organizers it will be useful also another check "My active tournament games" ... I can find exactly the dropdown I mean in "Start A Game" ... "Tournament".

Perhaps is not too difficult allow this dropdown for "Game Finder"???

About the question I didn't answer because now it is not able ANY dropdown, but I think it is "necesary".

[lackattack]

Thanks for proposing this solution qwert! Finally, we went with timmytuttut88's approach instead because that one was very simple.

[Sniper08]

the new feature is worse than the old one,this suggestion is well better than the one that got implemented

Thanks for proposing this solution qwert! Finally, we went with timmytuttut88's approach instead because that one was very simple.

simple isnt better in this case ,the tournaments tab doesnt give you game numbers and now the drop box is gone which makes you type in the tournament name in order to get the game numbers.i know your probably gonna say its only a partial match needed but if all your tournaments start with the same type of name e.g.Sniper's 1v1 ... just typing sniper isnt enough cause i get a lot of game numbers.the old system is better than this one and this suggestion is better than both

[PepeAtila]

Fully agree!!

the new feature is worse than the old one,this suggestion is well better than the one that got implemented

Thanks for proposing this solution qwert! Finally, we went with timmytuttut88's approach instead because that one was very simple.

simple isnt better in this case ,the tournaments tab doesnt give you game numbers and now the drop box is gone which makes you type in the tournament name in order to get the game numbers.i know your probably gonna say its only a partial match needed but if all your tournaments start with the same type of name e.g.Sniper's 1v1 ... just typing sniper isnt enough cause i get a lot of game numbers.the old system is better than this one and this suggestion is better than both

[greenoaks]

TO's had discussed at length what would improve the Game Finder

timmy's suggestion didn't come close to being what we wanted

[qwert]

well,its look that game finder are completely ruined, and make imposibile to operated, what to say, its look that mine sugestion, now become even more better option then what whas implemented , and lack belive that its now "simple and better". Its look that lack dont use game finder for tournament.

""by lackattack on Wed May 25, 2011 11:23 pm

Thanks for proposing this solution qwert! Finally, we went with timmytuttut88's approach instead because that one was very simple.""
Well,i only can say that you are wrong, and what you implemented, not good, like people say,old version,whas much better then these iplementation. Now people need to know exactly name of tournament,othervise if they know only partial name, then can get thousand and thousand games.
These sugestion are still active, i hope that one smart mod will try to understand,mine much simple and easy aproach, where every player can arange what want to see in game finder, related on touranment drop down.

[blakebowling]

well,its look that game finder are completely ruined, and make imposibile to operated, what to say, its look that mine sugestion, now become even more better option then what whas implemented , and lack belive that its now "simple and better". Its look that lack dont use game finder for tournament.

""by lackattack on Wed May 25, 2011 11:23 pm

Thanks for proposing this solution qwert! Finally, we went with timmytuttut88's approach instead because that one was very simple.""
Well,i only can say that you are wrong, and what you implemented, not good, like people say,old version,whas much better then these iplementation. Now people need to know exactly name of tournament,othervise if they know only partial name, then can get thousand and thousand games.
These sugestion are still active, i hope that one smart mod will try to understand,mine much simple and easy aproach, where every player can arange what want to see in game finder, related on touranment drop down.

You don't seem to understand; Once a suggestion makes it to Submitted, it is COMPLETELY lack's decision on what gets implemented and what doesn't.
Our job is to ensure that suggestions have enough information, enough support, and are legitimate enough to be implemented.

[qwert]

Yes,i understand, and i must say,that these sugestion its still active, because i belive that these is best and easy and simple,then what they implemented.
Now i see that lack plan,its in force to hold these implementation,even when me, and its look community dont like these.
Now i only need to find timmytuttut88's sugestion topic,to see ,or to understand why hes sugestion are easy,and simple for use.

[blakebowling]

Yes,i understand, and i must say,that these sugestion its still active, because i belive that these is best and easy and simple,then what they implemented.
Now i see that lack plan,its in force to hold these implementation,even when me, and its look community dont like these.
Now i only need to find timmytuttut88's sugestion topic,to see ,or to understand why hes sugestion are easy,and simple for use.

lack is not saying that either suggestion is better or worse. He is saying that the one that was implemented was more simple to code. Yours would take more time to implement.

[greenoaks]

Yes,i understand, and i must say,that these sugestion its still active, because i belive that these is best and easy and simple,then what they implemented.
Now i see that lack plan,its in force to hold these implementation,even when me, and its look community dont like these.
Now i only need to find timmytuttut88's sugestion topic,to see ,or to understand why hes sugestion are easy,and simple for use.

lack is not saying that either suggestion is better or worse. He is saying that the one that was implemented was more simple to code. Yours would take more time to implement.

i understood that timmy's suggestion was easier to implement. lack admited to taking the easier to code route.

i am not sure lack understood timmy's suggestion was something that would be more difficult for tournament volunteers so i assume the reason the one by qwert was rejected was because it was more difficult to code not because he hates TO's