Forum

by **army of nobunaga** on Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:51 am

gold medals shouldnt grow from trees... and god hates a weenie...

by **iamkoolerthanu** on Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:35 pm

Bruceswar wrote:
jefjef wrote:Go for it.

What numbers are in mind?

20, 100, and 400

Those are basically the numbers I was thinking... Same as unique defeats except it would be unique wins.. It is possible, yet hard. Just what a GOLD medal should be.

Also will add a poll later I'm going to bed

by **iamkoolerthanu** on Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:33 pm

I added a poll

by **greenoaks** on Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:41 pm

this should be 3 medals

one for Doubles, Triples & Quads

and i would like the levels to be 20, 100 & 400

by **merch313** on Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:04 am

Great idea! I like the 400 for gold!

by **Sniper08** on Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:38 pm

gold medals should be hard to get not easy so 400 is a good number .

by **Commander62890** on Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:05 pm

greenoaks wrote:this should be 3 medals

one for Doubles, Triples & Quads

and i would like the levels to be 20, 100 & 400

400 different doubles partners is kind of absurd, imo

We want to make it just as difficult as the other medals, not more difficult.

The poll is not the same as greenoaks' idea, right? It's not split into dubs, trips, quads?

by **iamkoolerthanu** on Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:43 pm

Commander62890 wrote:
greenoaks wrote:this should be 3 medals

one for Doubles, Triples & Quads

and i would like the levels to be 20, 100 & 400

400 different doubles partners is kind of absurd, imo

We want to make it just as difficult as the other medals, not more difficult.

The poll is not the same as greenoaks' idea, right? It's not split into dubs, trips, quads?

No, the poll is for the idea of ALL partners, not dubs partners, trips partners, and quad partners. That's what my idea is anyway. Therefore, 400 is not an absurd number for the gold.

by **sdh** on Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:54 am

1 medal or 3 seperate medals, it's still the best new medal suggestion i've read.

by **drunkmonkey** on Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:07 am

I think one medal would suffice.

by **iamkoolerthanu** on Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:06 pm

sdh wrote:1 medal or 3 seperate medals, it's still the best new medal suggestion i've read.

Thank you sdh

drunkmonkey wrote:I think one medal would suffice.

And I agree.. That's what I am going for

Any other ideas/criticism/thoughts/etc?

by **iamkoolerthanu** on Fri Oct 29, 2010 6:52 pm

So who voted no, and why?

by **ViperOverLord** on Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:45 pm

I don't think it'll do a thing to stop farming like you claim (not that I really care). But I'm otherwise not opposed to the idea.

by **iamkoolerthanu** on Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:25 pm

ViperOverLord wrote:I don't think it'll do a thing to stop farming like you claim (not that I really care). But I'm otherwise not opposed to the idea.

I don't mean to say it will stop farming... I mean to say that it will be harder to farm with this medal... like harder to farm in order to receive this medal. Idk how to word what I am saying... lol

by **dwilhelmi** on Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:31 pm

iamkoolerthanu wrote:
ViperOverLord wrote:I don't think it'll do a thing to stop farming like you claim (not that I really care). But I'm otherwise not opposed to the idea.

I don't mean to say it will stop farming... I mean to say that it will be harder to farm with this medal... like harder to farm in order to receive this medal. Idk how to word what I am saying... lol

It would be a metal that would be difficult to achieve via standard farming methods. I like it! =D>