i think fairplay is better than gameplay. it is more specific. what we want is attributes that reflect as much as possible about a persons style of play, either to boast about to to learn from.
for me i would have the following.
these should say all about a person.
plus one thing i am annoyed about is that its a givin now that u get 5 points just for playing,. even if u played with no skill, we really should only award a 5 on level that is deserved. i mean a 3 means you did ok, if you did great and you would have won. but ppl expect 5 for everything these days. and so now i have falling under the same thing and keep giving out high marks just so i dont get moaned at.
it should be noted that just because someone may give you a 3 does not mean they dislike you or they thought you played bad. 3 is a standared number for nothing bad or nothing special. to get higher you have to show merit in such task.
I suppose its the world we now live in where ppl just want to be told there great no matter what and cant take fair criticism.
anyway those so far i think best explains a persons gamplay as a hole. anything more and ppl wont do.
plus also ppl i think should at least have a mandatory % of how many ppl they should rate. before they can continue playing any more games. i am a bit tired of someone playing 100 games and rating none.
also very tired of those ppl who go away or do not wish to continue playing and hold up the game on there turn cos they dont wish to.
I think a opt out of game should be created for events that you wish to leave. either your losing or your going away.
anyway thats my 12 cents