Forum

by **jpcloet** on Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:11 am

I believe that is the way another clan does it.

by **jiminski** on Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:58 am

jpcloet wrote:I believe that is the way another clan does it.

doing it oneself is often the fastest, if not the most satisfying way to get relief.

by **jiminski** on Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:34 pm

Mod - you may lock this if you like.. i think this can be achieved without the need for layered access via a sister usergroup.

(get NightStrike in he love

by **jiminski** on Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:34 pm

Mod - you may lock this if you like.. i think this can be achieved without the need for layered access via a sister usergroup.

(get NightStrike in, he loves locking threads

)

by **jbrettlip** on Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:39 pm

jpcloet wrote:I forget which clan does it, but new recruits are only allowed to post in one thread until they have proven themselves. Or they get booted. I want to say BPB, but might have been another clan.

Not the Bpb, we encourage new recruits to troll all threads. How else can we determine their worth?

Seriously though, I like the idea. I am always scared if we let a new person in, that they might be a plant or a spy. So I always vote no.

by **jiminski** on Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:49 pm

jbrettlip wrote:
jpcloet wrote:I forget which clan does it, but new recruits are only allowed to post in one thread until they have proven themselves. Or they get booted. I want to say BPB, but might have been another clan.

Not the Bpb, we encourage new recruits to troll all threads. How else can we determine their worth?

Seriously though, I like the idea. I am always scared if we let a new person in, that they might be a plant or a spy. So I always vote no.

hahah.. i bet you had a few different drafts of that brett... many including Delia?

by **blakebowling** on Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:42 pm

jiminski wrote:Mod - you may lock this if you like.. i think this can be achieved without the need for layered access via a sister usergroup.

(get NightStrike in, he loves locking threads )

Well. Lack could give everyone admin and let them set their own permissions for each group member.. but I highly doubt that will happen.

by **KoolBak** on Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:00 pm

Well....we had this feature at our old headquarters thru MSN I believe it was (xigames group is 7+ years old). In some ways it was cool but in others it was not. It also led to adding further layers for the leaders, committees, discussion groups, etc and it got messy. Overall I did not like it; here in CC xi has 120 or so members, each one having gone thru the required steps and we have never had a problem that this suggestion would resolve.

Additionally, I simply dont think this will happen.....especially if you keep badgering the mods....lol.