[GP/UI] No Fortifications / Reinforcements

[wcaclimbing]

I would play it.

It would completely rearrange my current strategy to win, but whatever, it sounds fun enough to lose a few points over

[cazmart]

I am an all or nothing type of person...meaning normally I like playing unlimited fortifications...but....

I love the posibility of this option. Talk about strategy...huge.

Only Negative i see is the times your opponent gets that great drop and controls a bonus...You are probably going to lose in that scenario without the ability to create a large attack group.

Even with that beins said I would like to see it.

[keiths31]

No fortification option?There are a group of us playing a game without forting after your turn. Anyone else ever try playing a game this way? Anyone interested in making this an option?

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1696286



--------------------------------------

Suggestion Idea: No Fortification Option

Specifics: A fourth fortification option would be added to the Start A Game choices, but it would be for No Forts

Why it is needed: There's already an option for no cards, so why not?? It would add a heck of a lot more strategy.


---------------------------------------


*for the record-this is Timminz idea*

[Herakilla]

i think this is a great idea, easily enough programmed

[herndawg]

I like this also, would make for good strategery or however you psell taht.
Also, an option for a 1 or 2 minute speed game would rule. mentioned in another post.

I vote yes

[TaCktiX]

It'd be cool to have no-Fort matches. So definitely a thumbs-up from me (not that it matters other than +1).

[sully800]

I don't know why I never thought of it before, but I like the idea! You could really get screwed by trapping your troops behind your own lines

A+ suggestion, because I'm sure it would be very easy to implement and it would have a big effect on gameplay in some instances.

[Night Strike]

Come on keiths31, you put forth a good idea but you forgot to use the form. Geez, you're letting your fellow G1 members down. Good thing I've got your back.

--------------------------------------

Suggestion Idea: No Fortification Option

Specifics: A fourth fortification option would be added to the Start A Game choices, but it would be for No Forts

Why it is needed: There's already an option for no cards, so why not?? It would add a heck of a lot more strategy.

[timmytuttut88]

DO IT DO IT!!!!

[Optimus Prime]

Yes, this would be AWESOME! I bet I would win lots more games like this.

[keiths31]

Come on keiths31, you put forth a good idea but you forgot to use the form. Geez, you're letting your fellow G1 members down. Good thing I've got your back.

There was a form...d'oh!

And you have to give the credit for the idea to Timminz. His idea and he created the game...I am merely a player

[Dancing Mustard]

Heh, good game... whyever not.

I officially approve of the implementation of this (I assume nearly zero required effort) game option.

[sfhbballnut]

wow I can just see it massive army gets stuck, completly useless til someone decides to attack t, this would be a mess, but a lot of fun, i say it should be considered

[timmytuttut88]

imagine that in fudal war

[Optimus Prime]

wow I can just see it massive army gets stuck, completly useless til someone decides to attack t, this would be a mess, but a lot of fun, i say it should be considered

If people no ahead of time that they cannot fortify, they will be much more careful about placing armies. They will be placing 3 here, 4 there, 2 over there and such. That way they can advance in more complicated fashions.

I see this idea as one that will REALLY prove who knows how to play strategically and who doesn't. Would LOVE to see it implemented.

[Herakilla]

wow I can just see it massive army gets stuck, completly useless til someone decides to attack t, this would be a mess, but a lot of fun, i say it should be considered

If people no ahead of time that they cannot fortify, they will be much more careful about placing armies. They will be placing 3 here, 4 there, 2 over there and such. That way they can advance in more complicated fashions.

I see this idea as one that will REALLY prove who knows how to play strategically and who doesn't. Would LOVE to see it implemented.

QFT

[jennifermarie]

this sounds really cool!

[keiths31]

QFT

huh?

[militant]

QFT

huh?

It means quote for truth, so Herakilla agrees with the post he quoted.
Antway, i think no forts would be a awesome idea, and like optimus said it would increase stratergy used in games. Thumbs up from me to

[keiths31]

QFT

huh?

It means quote for truth, so Herakilla agrees with the post he quoted.
Antway, i think no forts would be a awesome idea, and like optimus said it would increase stratergy used in games. Thumbs up from me to

huh...I learned something today

[Forza AZ]

Interesting idea. Team games will change a lot also with this as you would have to attack your partners armies to get a bonus. Think this will result in longer and more interesting team games.

[insomniacdude]

Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes.

[Timminz]

*for the record-this is Timminz idea*

For the record, I was not the first one to suggest this. I forget who was, but I remember a month or 2 ago I thought of it and before making a suggestion, I searched for it. There was another thread already started. I'm not sure who started it, or what happened to the idea. I re-thought of this the other day and started one. It's gonna be interesting.

[Timminz]

Interesting idea. Team games will change a lot also with this as you would have to attack your partners armies to get a bonus. Think this will result in longer and more interesting team games.

But, they could attack away first, leaving only 1. In some situations.

[Timminz]

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... ight=forts

It was actually a fellow Gen 1-er, Coleman, who suggested it, but he didn't use the form.