Random Settings

[Queen_Herpes]

This is a great idea and I don't see why it shouldn't get pushed forward. The more chaos, the better.

[QoH]

Concise description:

• Random Settings

Specifics/Details:

• Just like random maps, you get a random combination of settings.

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

• Will add another twist to the game, and prove players more versatile.

EDIT: Couldn't find this in previous suggestions. If it's been rejected, whoops!

[TheForgivenOne]

Merged

[PLAYER57832]

As long as you can choose between freestyle and sequential, I would love it. The other types are fun variation, but freestyle requires a significantly greater real time commitment to play well.

[Powerhawks]

Yes that should be great to have random OPTION for ALL setting type.

I will surely use that option for some setting, this is the best to increase my skill, playing type of game, that I am choosing normally.

Also some player that have a good rating, always plays the same type of game, some others with a smaller rating try to play many type of game. Whit random possibility we will know which one are the best...on any type of games setting!

Imagine a tournament with many settings at random, we can find the true best player!

[sniffie]

As long as you can choose between freestyle and sequential, I would love it. The other types are fun variation, but freestyle requires a significantly greater real time commitment to play well.

So you wish to make random less random??
I don't like adjacent forts at all but in this suggestion that is just the risk/fun of joining/creating this type of game.

sniff

[PLAYER57832]

As long as you can choose between freestyle and sequential, I would love it. The other types are fun variation, but freestyle requires a significantly greater real time commitment to play well.

So you wish to make random less random??
I don't like adjacent forts at all but in this suggestion that is just the risk/fun of joining/creating this type of game.

sniff

This is more like randomizing speed in. Playing freestyle requires a significant time commitment not there with Sequential. Its not just a matter of shifting strategy, its a matter of having the time to just sit.

[sniffie]

As long as you can choose between freestyle and sequential, I would love it. The other types are fun variation, but freestyle requires a significantly greater real time commitment to play well.

So you wish to make random less random??
I don't like adjacent forts at all but in this suggestion that is just the risk/fun of joining/creating this type of game.

sniff

This is more like randomizing speed in. Playing freestyle requires a significant time commitment not there with Sequential. Its not just a matter of shifting strategy, its a matter of having the time to just sit.

But that is the whole risk and (for me) the fun of random settings, I'd rather have a casual freestyle game then a sequential poison rome game...

sniff