Dream Team Medal

[agentcom]

A more relevant cause for a medal would be x amount of teammates you've won games with. Playing with the same teammates over and over is much easier than playing with new ones. (not that I know much about that but it says itself really )

good point

[greenoaks]

A more relevant cause for a medal would be x amount of teammates you've won games with. Playing with the same teammates over and over is much easier than playing with new ones. (not that I know much about that but it says itself really )

then put that forward as a suggestion.

this is about recognising your dream teams.

[Gillipig]

There's already such a suggestion! I actually added my support for that suggestion long ago. And I'm adding my disapproval for this suggestion because I think it's not a medal worthy feat to play with the same teammates. I don't think cc should encourage that with a medal. It's much better for the site if players chose to play with different teammates than with the same old. Sorry to knock your sugg greenoaks but I don't think this is a good idea.

[benga]

Farming here we come!!!!

And we have enough of those.

[chapcrap]

There's already such a suggestion! I actually added my support for that suggestion long ago. And I'm adding my disapproval for this suggestion because I think it's not a medal worthy feat to play with the same teammates. I don't think cc should encourage that with a medal. It's much better for the site if players chose to play with different teammates than with the same old. Sorry to knock your sugg greenoaks but I don't think this is a good idea.

So, you're saying the same suggestion was already made and you support that one, but not this one?

[jefjef]

To really be considered a "dream team" I think the criteria should be higher than suggested numbers AND a minimum positive win % for the team. Like 60%. And maybe even a map rank status better than point hoarder... (Reward players - not farmers).

[agentcom]

Yeah, I don't like this. It encourages farming. If someone directs me to the suggestion for a medal for most victories with a unique teammate, I'll support that.

[Gillipig]

So, you're saying the same suggestion was already made and you support that one, but not this one?

I hope these quotes does the explaining for me !

A more relevant cause for a medal would be x amount of teammates you've won games with. Playing with the same teammates over and over is much easier than playing with new ones. (not that I know much about that but it says itself really )

then put that forward as a suggestion.

this is about recognising your dream teams.

There's already such a suggestion! I actually added my support for that suggestion long ago. And I'm adding my disapproval for this suggestion because I think it's not a medal worthy feat to play with the same teammates. I don't think cc should encourage that with a medal. It's much better for the site if players chose to play with different teammates than with the same old. Sorry to knock your sugg greenoaks but I don't think this is a good idea.

[DoomYoshi]

Why reward players more than they already are for point gobbling?
This is almost as bad as the ratings medal.

[chapcrap]

Why reward players more than they already are for point gobbling?
This is almost as bad as the ratings medal.

Playing with the same team isn't point gobbling.

[DoomYoshi]

I can't tell the difference. I am a bit narrow-minded though.

[Criticalwinner]

This just isn't a very good idea. This would end up just like the ratings medal: rubbish.

[AAFitz]

If I got a medal for every team I won a number of games with, I actually think I might have more medals than points.

[Gillipig]

If I got a medal for every team I won a number of games with, I actually think I might have more medals than points.

Who cares?

[Criticalwinner]

I can't tell the difference. I am a bit narrow-minded though.

There's very little differences, but when some people find a team they stick with it until death do them part. It creates the illusion of point gobbling.