PLAYER57832 wrote:chapcrap wrote:Another person looking for a way to have an even, fun game.
lack, do you hear all of these requests?
Except rank does not really give you that information. Besides, too many higher ranked people will just refuse to play the lower ranks, meaning it will be even harder to climb the ladder.
I disagree. WIth rank segregation, it would be easier to climb the ladder.
If you have a pool of 100 players all ranked the same, the better players will rise to top and increase in rank, thus getting to play with the next group up. This would happen with all of the groups.
This isn't just speculation. This is from years of playing Yahoo! games like Spades and that's how it works there. If they didn't have a point cap at 3500 on Yahoo, people would have a ridiculous amount of points.