Moderators: Suggestions Team, Global Moderators


Eight-year olds, Dude.

owenshooter wrote:i disagree with you and i'm right!
zimmah wrote:it makes no sense if someone attacks you and you wouldn't even know you lost a region. (especially in the first turn)
i mean, is any country so disorganized that they would not remember exactly which region they lost in a war?
they may not have noticed which region the attack came from (altho i think they should know) but they should at least remember which territory they lost.
oran0007 wrote:zimmah wrote:it makes no sense if someone attacks you and you wouldn't even know you lost a region. (especially in the first turn)
i mean, is any country so disorganized that they would not remember exactly which region they lost in a war?
they may not have noticed which region the attack came from (altho i think they should know) but they should at least remember which territory they lost.
I totally agree with this. I usually know what region was lost, but I think that I should also know which region the attack came from, and obviously I will know who took it(perhaps that is why this may never change).

MagnusGreeol wrote:I agree with the captain, you should know the territory you lose, and to take it a step further,,in fog wars I think even the regions occupied should be fog as well,,if you don't know who's who,,how should you be able to know how many regions they have?? Keep it all a secret then, that way it would come as a surprise when you eliminate someone and get their spoils. How jou lie tha?



TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Have to agree with chap on this one. A king knows where his pawns are.
-TG
anonymus wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Have to agree with chap on this one. A king knows where his pawns are.
-TG
so why dont you?
/
Eight-year olds, Dude.
Metsfanmax wrote:Can we get an opinion from a tech guy on whether this is in the realm of possible things to implement?

Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest