Moderator: Community Team
by OliverFA on Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:31 pm
I like the idea of having a separate partial scoreboard.
However, I am not sure about the medal part. It could encourage some gamey tactics to score all points just at the end of the month and get that medal.
I think it could be just an alternative partial scoreboard that is always working and has the information of the last 30/365 days. So you could see the all time scoreboard and the partial scoreboard, that would give a notion of how good players are doing lately.
by assassin07 on Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:32 am
sounds great
Blitzaholic wrote:hwhrhett wrote:this would only cause people to purposefully tank their scores before the month in order to get the medal, wouldnt it?
this would not be right, plus the higher scores it hinders and not fair
qwert wrote:by Herakilla on Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:24 pm
maybe it is doable to have a second hidden score that resets every month and undergoes the same rules at the standard score? this score would then be the one that the MVP relies on. Make it hidden so then it doesnt take over the score system already in place and to make the MVP a bit of a surprise for those who win
But mine sugestion is that second scoreboard go like regular,only every mont all players start with 0,you have all in page 1.
Where is fun,if you hide scoreboard?
qwert wrote:I get these idea from tennis scoreboard.
Wta ,Atp its a same scoreboard system,you have regular scoreboard table,where you get and loose point(its depend how you play tournaments),and you have year scoreboard,where is collected point for these year. Here you will loose point on month scoreboard,and get in same way like in Regular"all time" scoreboard. Who collect biger number point for recent month he are MVP of these month,quit simple.
qwert wrote:For MVP you will get 1 medal every month,and these mean 12 medal for year. Now these will be very worthy medal, and these can get only 12 people for one year.
qwert wrote:Cam on give me some positive vibes guys.
by Natewolfman on Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:20 am
I think i see what qwert is trying to say...
the new scoreboard, everyone will have 0 points... so how you gain/lose points in THIS scoreboard will be the exact same as its a completely different score
cook with 5 points on big scoreboard starts with 0 in this chart
someone with 5,000 on big scoreboard starts with 0 in this chart
while the normal scoreboard is judged as it is, when they win a game they will both gain the same ammount of points on THIS scoreboard
confusing... but do you know what i mean?
Herakilla (and Nate in another post) are instead proposing that the MVP points are calculated as if every player where a new player every month. That would solve the unfair towards highrankers and points dumping/multi problems and still allow for a comparison of how people have done in the last month.
by lancehoch on Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:05 pm
Thezzaruz, I think that qwert is not worried about being fair to the high ranking players. These players are already rewarded by being at the top of the scoreboard. In all likelihood, the person who wins this will begin the month between an SFC and a major. In all honesty though, how many points do people usually gain during a month? I would think the max (most of the time, when people are playing legitimately) is around 300 points (just a guess). This is of course not counting JR's climb back up after he tried to get medals. But, I do not think it would be that difficult for someone around 3000 points to pick up 300 in a month either. If you play 8 player games against similar ranking players, you need to win 3 out of 6 games on the month for 300 points. That seems very doable to me (for everyone except sjnap being that he is 650 points above the next player).
qwert wrote:so far 8 yes and 1 no.
qwert wrote:High ranked player have fear,that cook will be MVP?
qwert wrote:Probably,but people afraid from cook
qwert wrote:Everybody must start with same number of point. Only in that way,everybody is equal.
barterer2002 wrote:I really like the idea qwert and think that the second option takes away the point dumping aspect since there isn't any reason to do so. It might also encourage higher ranks to play lower ranks more often-risking their overall points but potentially gaining monthly points.
by Hydrargentium on Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:40 pm
The only problem I see with that is that the General, who is by rank the best player in the game, can win more MVP points if he wins than either of the Captains, only because there are 2 Captains in the game. Why is that fair?
Any General is going to beat way more officers (Lieutenants and upwards) than a non-com (below Lieutenant) ever could. Under this scheme, the Sergeants and such have almost no chance to get MVP, and the top players have way more chances, especially if they play against others who are one rank lower than them.
I thought the point of all this was to give newer or lower-ranked players a chance to get in on the action, instead of only the elite.
Don't get me wrong, though. I really like the main idea, but I'm wondering how this new points scheme makes the game more accessible to players who haven't played 3000+ games.
I thought the point of all this was to give newer or lower-ranked players a chance to get in on the action, instead of only the elite.
by The Neon Peon on Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:26 am
I love the idea of an MVP of the month, but I do not see why the score system has to be different. Just have everyone start at 1000 each month, and scoring works as always.
a. Why is there a need to change the system, seems fine now? Just sees who can get most points in one month when everyone starts equal with the MVP of the month.
b. If there is no change in scoring = less to program = this gets made a part of the site faster.
A few other suggestions:
1. Anyone who joined after the month has started will not go on the scoreboard. This eliminates point farming, or at least reduces it a whole ton for the MVP scoreboard, will still occur for the actual one, but that is their business.
2. Split it into premium/freemium. Lets face it, the MVP is about getting many wins and fast in one month, a whole lot less chance a freemium can get up there (as it should be), but I would still think it is better to split it.
blacky44 wrote:I think this is a great idea but premium players get to play more games so more wins but also more losses. I think we should keep the old scoreboard and have the MVP scoreboard and also have a premium MVP and freemium MVP. I also think we should have a yearly MVP.
blacky44 wrote:
I think this is a great idea but premium players get to play more games so more wins but also more losses. I think we should keep the old scoreboard and have the MVP scoreboard and also have a premium MVP and freemium MVP. I also think we should have a yearly MVP.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users