Moderator: Community Team
Optimus Prime wrote:Nope, not necessarily. This is a proper interview, randomly posting stuff... not so much.
Kotaro wrote:Optimus Prime wrote:Nope, not necessarily. This is a proper interview, randomly posting stuff... not so much.
Rules only bent for Admin's personal gain. Noted.
If you could kick any of the 4 admins in the nuts hard enough to knock their nuts into the back of their throats, whom would it be?
jbrettlip wrote:Kotaro wrote:Optimus Prime wrote:Nope, not necessarily. This is a proper interview, randomly posting stuff... not so much.
Rules only bent for Admin's personal gain. Noted.
If you could kick any of the 4 admins in the nuts hard enough to knock their nuts into the back of their throats, whom would it be?
Best post I have ever read of yours, Kot.
tdans wrote:lets rock this joint ... or.. lets have them Blow this,,,,,, joint
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Yes.Strife wrote:Please answer "yes" or "no" only:
Would you like a chicken nugget(or soy faux-nugget, if you are vegan or vegetarian), why or why not?
Let's see you answer that... You can't it's impossible.
owenshooter wrote:2009-09-22 07:58:23 - lanyards was kicked out for violating the rules
how do you feel about people that violate the first rule of CC being allowed to buy back in, despite their having a negative impact on the site and it's members? how do you feel about someone like yourself who posted where only 3 percent of CC'ers ever visit, being treated as if your transgressions are far worse than convicted multis that are let out of purgatory for $25? would you pay $25 to be let back in the forums and to have access to your pm's, etc, again?-0
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users