Forum

by **DerbyD** on Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:41 pm

Accused:

prozipps
Freebyrd1977

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

Game 12144559
Game 12466573
Game 12392819
Game 12261253

Comments:Out of the last 17 games "Prozipps" has been in, so was "Freebyrd1977". Looking at the round log(s) in these games you can clearly see neither of them has taken a continent from the other until one of them has killed off the last remaining player besides themselves. They only attack each other when it is a country holding 1 army so they may gain a card.
prozipps created a new game 12466573 and Freebryd1977 join immediately. The game has fill and is just starting. I suggest you watch this game very closely so you can see for yourself.

by **a6mzero** on Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:57 pm

I guess he,they , learned from the masters Kiron and Xiangwang lol

by **rishaed** on Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:30 am

a6mzero wrote:I guess he,they , learned from the masters Kiron and Xiangwang lol

This and that are two separate issues, leave it out of this matter.

I am by no means defending them, but the case IS PENDING, and as such is only discussable in the LOCKED thread you see here or in General Discussions. THis is about two other players, who may be multis, nothing new and certainly nothing that hasn't been dealt with before. I think the mods can figure this out pretty quick if they are multi's, if its Secret Diplomacy it may need a bit more evidence. :roll:

by **sniffie** on Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:19 am

pending

by **DerbyD** on Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:52 pm

It has been a week, may we have an update on your findings?

by **jltile1** on Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:58 pm

DerbyD wrote:It has been a week, may we have an update on your findings?

Well obviously there are no findings as you have not been updated :roll:

by **Funkyterrance** on Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:47 pm

jltile1 wrote:
DerbyD wrote:It has been a week, may we have an update on your findings?

Well obviously there are no findings as you have not been updated

I think he was politely asking "what's the hold up?"...

by **deathcomesrippin** on Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:28 am

Cleared of being multis.

Noted for SD.

by **DerbyD** on Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:03 am

deathcomesrippin wrote:Cleared of being multis.

Noted for SD.

what does that mean?

by **deathcomesrippin** on Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:33 am

DerbyD wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:Cleared of being multis.

Noted for SD.

what does that mean?

It means they were Noted for Secret Diplomacy.

by **DerbyD** on Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:21 pm

deathcomesrippin wrote:
DerbyD wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:Cleared of being multis.

Noted for SD.

what does that mean?

It means they were Noted for Secret Diplomacy.

It sounds like their names were written down in a notebook with a comment, *Secret Diplomacy. If a moderator took the time to log in their names, then it is logical that the moderator thinks they are guilty of secret diplomacy. There must be more to it than that.

here · by **sempaispellcheck** on Fri Mar 29, 2013 12:01 am

DerbyD wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:
DerbyD wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:Cleared of being multis.

Noted for SD.

what does that mean?

It means they were Noted for Secret Diplomacy.

It sounds like their names were written down in a notebook with a comment, *Secret Diplomacy. If a moderator took the time to log in their names, then it is logical that the moderator thinks they are guilty of secret diplomacy. There must be more to it than that.

That's basically what happened - since it's their first offense.
If they do it again, they get a warning.
A third time, it's a short ban (I forget the exact length of time).
If they keep doing it after that, the bans get longer and longer.