jackal31 wrote:this is the first i've had a chance to look at it and i think it would be great but only if it were restricted to 1v1. Team games are just that....TEAM GAMES.....you have to rely on your team to do well and learn to communicate with them.
On the other hand, if you were trying to learn strategy on a new map and didnt want to lose points in the process, then a game against yourself would be beneficial.
so my vote is YES for 1v1 ......
and NO for everything else.....
mattattam wrote:that wont be an option though if you create a game with 4 different players and then one person joins the other team and invites him/herself for the whole team.....then team 1 just got screwed (essentially)
FarangDemon wrote:1) A team game will be either like original doubs, trips, quads (all unique players)
2) A team game will be 1v1 doubs, trips, quads (1 player controls all players)
Chuuuuck wrote:I think the whole idea is great. I think players should even be allowed to take on a team. 1 vs 4.
If they do this then they lose points for every slot they take up or they gain points for every slot they take up. I personally would play it some that way but I wouldn't mind being on the other side of things because I would think 4 of us could come up with more ideas than that 1 person.
wolfpack0530 wrote:farmers paradise. This sounds like a suggestion from a general who just cant quite make it to field marshal or conqueror and is looking for a way to sneak their way in 6-10 points at a time.
iamkoolerthanu wrote:In this situation, the answer is yes. All this would do would be to add another option that people can click, and farm with. Since people already farm without this option, there is little harm, yet since many people would love to play with this option, the positives are great.
edwinissweet wrote:To the OP, if you could please keep the discusion's progress in the first post i would really appriciate it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests